Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreements of the Detection of Demodex Infestation by in Vivo Confocal Microscopy.

Beyoglu Eye Journal Pub Date : 2022-08-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14744/bej.2022.37880
Ayse Yildiz Tas, Burak Mergen, Erdost Yildiz, Betul N Bayraktutar, Ekrem Celik, Afsun Sahin, Ceyhun Arici
{"title":"Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreements of the Detection of <i>Demodex</i> Infestation by <i>in Vivo</i> Confocal Microscopy.","authors":"Ayse Yildiz Tas,&nbsp;Burak Mergen,&nbsp;Erdost Yildiz,&nbsp;Betul N Bayraktutar,&nbsp;Ekrem Celik,&nbsp;Afsun Sahin,&nbsp;Ceyhun Arici","doi":"10.14744/bej.2022.37880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of the study was to determine interobserver and intraobserver agreement, repeatability, and intrasubject variation of the detection of Demodex infestation in eyelids of blepharitis patients using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-three eyes of 42 blepharitis patients were included in the study. All eyelids were evaluated from temporal to nasal with IVCM using section mode and 10 lashes with their follicles were imagined, and every image with suspicion of Demodex infestation was recorded. Two experienced and two inexperienced ophthalmologists were masked for the diagnosis and interpreted the IVCM images regarding the presence of Demodex infestation with a 3-week interval. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were calculated with Cohen's kappa and its variant statistics between and within experienced observers and between inexperienced observers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While average sensitivity for the diagnosis of demodicosis in IVCM images was 83.35% for experienced and 51.35% for inexperienced observers, the average positive predictive value was 88.6% for experienced observers and 91.05% for inexperienced ones. Interobserver agreement between experienced observers was moderate (κ = 0.529) and intraobserver agreements within experienced observers were perfect (κ = 0.918 for observer-1; κ = 0.958 for observer-2). Interobserver agreement between inexperienced observers was poor (κ = 0.162) and intraobserver agreements within inexperienced observers were fair (κ = 0.427 for observer-3; κ = 0.475 for observer-4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sensitivity, interobserver and intraobserver agreements in IVCM image analysis for the detection of Demodex infestation were highly associated with the clinical experience on IVCM imaging. In the hands of an experienced clinician, IVCM could be reliable for the diagnosis of ocular demodicosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8740,"journal":{"name":"Beyoglu Eye Journal","volume":"7 3","pages":"173-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/81/0e/BEJ-7-173.PMC9522997.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyoglu Eye Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/bej.2022.37880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to determine interobserver and intraobserver agreement, repeatability, and intrasubject variation of the detection of Demodex infestation in eyelids of blepharitis patients using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).

Methods: Eighty-three eyes of 42 blepharitis patients were included in the study. All eyelids were evaluated from temporal to nasal with IVCM using section mode and 10 lashes with their follicles were imagined, and every image with suspicion of Demodex infestation was recorded. Two experienced and two inexperienced ophthalmologists were masked for the diagnosis and interpreted the IVCM images regarding the presence of Demodex infestation with a 3-week interval. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were calculated with Cohen's kappa and its variant statistics between and within experienced observers and between inexperienced observers.

Results: While average sensitivity for the diagnosis of demodicosis in IVCM images was 83.35% for experienced and 51.35% for inexperienced observers, the average positive predictive value was 88.6% for experienced observers and 91.05% for inexperienced ones. Interobserver agreement between experienced observers was moderate (κ = 0.529) and intraobserver agreements within experienced observers were perfect (κ = 0.918 for observer-1; κ = 0.958 for observer-2). Interobserver agreement between inexperienced observers was poor (κ = 0.162) and intraobserver agreements within inexperienced observers were fair (κ = 0.427 for observer-3; κ = 0.475 for observer-4).

Conclusion: The sensitivity, interobserver and intraobserver agreements in IVCM image analysis for the detection of Demodex infestation were highly associated with the clinical experience on IVCM imaging. In the hands of an experienced clinician, IVCM could be reliable for the diagnosis of ocular demodicosis.

Abstract Image

用体内共聚焦显微镜检测蠕形螨感染的观察者间和观察者内一致性。
目的:本研究的目的是确定使用体内共聚焦显微镜(IVCM)检测眼睑蠕形螨感染的观察者之间和观察者内部的一致性、可重复性和受试者内部的差异。方法:选取42例睑缘炎患者83只眼作为研究对象。采用IVCM切片模式对所有眼睑从颞部到鼻部进行评估,想象10个睫毛及其毛囊,记录每一张疑似蠕形螨感染的图像。两名经验丰富的眼科医生和两名经验不足的眼科医生进行诊断,并解释IVCM图像关于蠕形螨感染的存在,间隔3周。观察者之间和观察者内部的协议是用Cohen's kappa及其在有经验的观察者之间和内部以及没有经验的观察者之间的可变统计来计算的。结果:IVCM影像对蠕虫病诊断的平均敏感性,经验丰富者为83.35%,经验不足者为51.35%,经验丰富者为88.6%,经验不足者为91.05%。经验丰富的观察者之间的观察者之间的一致性为中等(κ = 0.529),经验丰富的观察者内部的观察者之间的一致性为完美(κ = 0.918,观察者-1;κ = 0.958(观察者2)。没有经验的观察者之间的观察者之间的一致性很差(κ = 0.162),没有经验的观察者内部的观察者之间的一致性是公平的(观察者-3的κ = 0.427;κ = 0.475 (observer-4)。结论:IVCM图像分析检测蠕形螨的灵敏度、观察者间和观察者内一致性与临床经验密切相关。在经验丰富的临床医生的手中,IVCM可以可靠地诊断眼部蠕虫病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信