On the use of Earth Observation to support estimates of national greenhouse gas emissions and sinks for the Global stocktake process: lessons learned from ESA-CCI RECCAP2

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ana Bastos, Philippe Ciais, Stephen Sitch, Luiz E. O. C. Aragão, Frédéric Chevallier, Dominic Fawcett, Thais M. Rosan, Marielle Saunois, Dirk Günther, Lucia Perugini, Colas Robert, Zhu Deng, Julia Pongratz, Raphael Ganzenmüller, Richard Fuchs, Karina Winkler, Sönke Zaehle, Clément Albergel
{"title":"On the use of Earth Observation to support estimates of national greenhouse gas emissions and sinks for the Global stocktake process: lessons learned from ESA-CCI RECCAP2","authors":"Ana Bastos,&nbsp;Philippe Ciais,&nbsp;Stephen Sitch,&nbsp;Luiz E. O. C. Aragão,&nbsp;Frédéric Chevallier,&nbsp;Dominic Fawcett,&nbsp;Thais M. Rosan,&nbsp;Marielle Saunois,&nbsp;Dirk Günther,&nbsp;Lucia Perugini,&nbsp;Colas Robert,&nbsp;Zhu Deng,&nbsp;Julia Pongratz,&nbsp;Raphael Ganzenmüller,&nbsp;Richard Fuchs,&nbsp;Karina Winkler,&nbsp;Sönke Zaehle,&nbsp;Clément Albergel","doi":"10.1186/s13021-022-00214-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Global Stocktake (GST), implemented by the Paris Agreement, requires rapid developments in the capabilities to quantify annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals consistently from the global to the national scale and improvements to national GHG inventories. In particular, new capabilities are needed for accurate attribution of sources and sinks and their trends to natural and anthropogenic processes. On the one hand, this is still a major challenge as national GHG inventories follow globally harmonized methodologies based on the guidelines established by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, but these can be implemented differently for individual countries. Moreover, in many countries the capability to systematically produce detailed and annually updated GHG inventories is still lacking. On the other hand, spatially-explicit datasets quantifying sources and sinks of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Earth Observations (EO) are still limited by many sources of uncertainty. While national GHG inventories follow diverse methodologies depending on the availability of activity data in the different countries, the proposed comparison with EO-based estimates can help improve our understanding of the comparability of the estimates published by the different countries. Indeed, EO networks and satellite platforms have seen a massive expansion in the past decade, now covering a wide range of essential climate variables and offering high potential to improve the quantification of global and regional GHG budgets and advance process understanding. Yet, there is no EO data that quantifies greenhouse gas fluxes directly, rather there are observations of variables or proxies that can be transformed into fluxes using models. Here, we report results and lessons from the ESA-CCI RECCAP2 project, whose goal was to engage with National Inventory Agencies to improve understanding about the methods used by each community to estimate sources and sinks of GHGs and to evaluate the potential for satellite and in-situ EO to improve national GHG estimates. Based on this dialogue and recent studies, we discuss the potential of EO approaches to provide estimates of GHG budgets that can be compared with those of national GHG inventories. We outline a roadmap for implementation of an EO carbon-monitoring program that can contribute to the Paris Agreement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526973/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-022-00214-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The Global Stocktake (GST), implemented by the Paris Agreement, requires rapid developments in the capabilities to quantify annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals consistently from the global to the national scale and improvements to national GHG inventories. In particular, new capabilities are needed for accurate attribution of sources and sinks and their trends to natural and anthropogenic processes. On the one hand, this is still a major challenge as national GHG inventories follow globally harmonized methodologies based on the guidelines established by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, but these can be implemented differently for individual countries. Moreover, in many countries the capability to systematically produce detailed and annually updated GHG inventories is still lacking. On the other hand, spatially-explicit datasets quantifying sources and sinks of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Earth Observations (EO) are still limited by many sources of uncertainty. While national GHG inventories follow diverse methodologies depending on the availability of activity data in the different countries, the proposed comparison with EO-based estimates can help improve our understanding of the comparability of the estimates published by the different countries. Indeed, EO networks and satellite platforms have seen a massive expansion in the past decade, now covering a wide range of essential climate variables and offering high potential to improve the quantification of global and regional GHG budgets and advance process understanding. Yet, there is no EO data that quantifies greenhouse gas fluxes directly, rather there are observations of variables or proxies that can be transformed into fluxes using models. Here, we report results and lessons from the ESA-CCI RECCAP2 project, whose goal was to engage with National Inventory Agencies to improve understanding about the methods used by each community to estimate sources and sinks of GHGs and to evaluate the potential for satellite and in-situ EO to improve national GHG estimates. Based on this dialogue and recent studies, we discuss the potential of EO approaches to provide estimates of GHG budgets that can be compared with those of national GHG inventories. We outline a roadmap for implementation of an EO carbon-monitoring program that can contribute to the Paris Agreement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

关于利用地球观测支持全球盘点过程中各国温室气体排放和汇的估计:从ESA-CCI RECCAP2获得的经验教训
《巴黎协定》实施的全球盘点(GST)要求迅速发展从全球到国家规模持续量化年度温室气体(GHG)排放和清除的能力,并改进国家温室气体清单。特别是需要新的能力来准确地将源和汇及其趋势归因于自然和人为过程。一方面,这仍然是一项重大挑战,因为各国温室气体清单遵循的是基于政府间气候变化专门委员会制定的指导方针的全球统一方法,但这些方法可以在个别国家以不同的方式实施。此外,许多国家仍然缺乏系统地编制详细和每年更新的温室气体清单的能力。另一方面,量化来自地球观测(EO)的二氧化碳、甲烷和一氧化二氮排放源和汇的空间明确数据集仍然受到许多不确定性来源的限制。虽然根据不同国家活动数据的可得性,国家温室气体清单采用不同的方法,但拟议的与基于生态系统的估算进行比较可以帮助我们更好地理解不同国家公布的估算的可比性。事实上,在过去十年中,观测网络和卫星平台经历了大规模的扩展,现在覆盖了广泛的基本气候变量,并为改善全球和区域温室气体预算的量化以及促进对过程的理解提供了巨大的潜力。然而,没有直接量化温室气体通量的观测数据,而是有可使用模式转换为通量的变量或代理的观测结果。在这里,我们报告了ESA-CCI RECCAP2项目的结果和经验教训,该项目的目标是与国家清单机构合作,提高对每个社区用于估算温室气体源和汇的方法的理解,并评估卫星和原位EO改进国家温室气体估算的潜力。基于这一对话和最近的研究,我们讨论了EO方法在提供可与国家温室气体清单相比较的温室气体预算估算方面的潜力。我们概述了一份实施EO碳监测计划的路线图,该计划可为《巴黎协定》作出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Carbon Balance and Management
Carbon Balance and Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle. The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community. This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system. Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信