Caroline P Hoch, Daniel J Scott, Christopher E Gross
{"title":"Medicaid Patients Face Limited Access to Care for Ankle Sprains in Unexpanded States.","authors":"Caroline P Hoch, Daniel J Scott, Christopher E Gross","doi":"10.1177/19386400221125375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our goal was to determine whether state Medicaid expansion and patient insurance statuses affected access to care for ankle sprain patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four pairs of Medicaid expanded (Kentucky, Louisiana, Iowa, and Arizona) and unexpanded (North Carolina, Alabama, Wisconsin, and Texas) states were chosen. Twelve practices from each state (N = 96) were randomly selected from the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) directory and called twice to request an appointment for a fictitious 16-year-old with a first-time ankle sprain using either Medicaid insurance or Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) private insurance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An appointment was obtained at 65.6% clinics when calling with BCBS and at 45.8% with Medicaid (P =.006). There was a significant difference in successful scheduling based on insurance status in Medicaid unexpanded states (P = .007). In all states except Iowa, there were more appointments scheduled using BCBS than with Medicaid. The 3 main reasons for appointment denial were inability to provide an insurance identification number (47.1%), insurance status (23.5%), and whether the patient was referred (17.6%). The waiting period for an appointment did not differ by Medicaid expansion or insurance statuses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with first-time ankle sprains, access to care is more difficult using Medicaid insurance rather than private insurance, especially in Medicaid unexpanded states.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II prospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"74-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400221125375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Our goal was to determine whether state Medicaid expansion and patient insurance statuses affected access to care for ankle sprain patients.
Methods: Four pairs of Medicaid expanded (Kentucky, Louisiana, Iowa, and Arizona) and unexpanded (North Carolina, Alabama, Wisconsin, and Texas) states were chosen. Twelve practices from each state (N = 96) were randomly selected from the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) directory and called twice to request an appointment for a fictitious 16-year-old with a first-time ankle sprain using either Medicaid insurance or Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) private insurance.
Results: An appointment was obtained at 65.6% clinics when calling with BCBS and at 45.8% with Medicaid (P =.006). There was a significant difference in successful scheduling based on insurance status in Medicaid unexpanded states (P = .007). In all states except Iowa, there were more appointments scheduled using BCBS than with Medicaid. The 3 main reasons for appointment denial were inability to provide an insurance identification number (47.1%), insurance status (23.5%), and whether the patient was referred (17.6%). The waiting period for an appointment did not differ by Medicaid expansion or insurance statuses.
Conclusion: For patients with first-time ankle sprains, access to care is more difficult using Medicaid insurance rather than private insurance, especially in Medicaid unexpanded states.
Level of evidence: Level II prospective cohort study.