Medicaid Patients Face Limited Access to Care for Ankle Sprains in Unexpanded States.

Foot & ankle specialist Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-30 DOI:10.1177/19386400221125375
Caroline P Hoch, Daniel J Scott, Christopher E Gross
{"title":"Medicaid Patients Face Limited Access to Care for Ankle Sprains in Unexpanded States.","authors":"Caroline P Hoch, Daniel J Scott, Christopher E Gross","doi":"10.1177/19386400221125375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our goal was to determine whether state Medicaid expansion and patient insurance statuses affected access to care for ankle sprain patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four pairs of Medicaid expanded (Kentucky, Louisiana, Iowa, and Arizona) and unexpanded (North Carolina, Alabama, Wisconsin, and Texas) states were chosen. Twelve practices from each state (N = 96) were randomly selected from the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) directory and called twice to request an appointment for a fictitious 16-year-old with a first-time ankle sprain using either Medicaid insurance or Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) private insurance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An appointment was obtained at 65.6% clinics when calling with BCBS and at 45.8% with Medicaid (P =.006). There was a significant difference in successful scheduling based on insurance status in Medicaid unexpanded states (P = .007). In all states except Iowa, there were more appointments scheduled using BCBS than with Medicaid. The 3 main reasons for appointment denial were inability to provide an insurance identification number (47.1%), insurance status (23.5%), and whether the patient was referred (17.6%). The waiting period for an appointment did not differ by Medicaid expansion or insurance statuses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with first-time ankle sprains, access to care is more difficult using Medicaid insurance rather than private insurance, especially in Medicaid unexpanded states.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II prospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"74-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400221125375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Our goal was to determine whether state Medicaid expansion and patient insurance statuses affected access to care for ankle sprain patients.

Methods: Four pairs of Medicaid expanded (Kentucky, Louisiana, Iowa, and Arizona) and unexpanded (North Carolina, Alabama, Wisconsin, and Texas) states were chosen. Twelve practices from each state (N = 96) were randomly selected from the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) directory and called twice to request an appointment for a fictitious 16-year-old with a first-time ankle sprain using either Medicaid insurance or Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) private insurance.

Results: An appointment was obtained at 65.6% clinics when calling with BCBS and at 45.8% with Medicaid (P =.006). There was a significant difference in successful scheduling based on insurance status in Medicaid unexpanded states (P = .007). In all states except Iowa, there were more appointments scheduled using BCBS than with Medicaid. The 3 main reasons for appointment denial were inability to provide an insurance identification number (47.1%), insurance status (23.5%), and whether the patient was referred (17.6%). The waiting period for an appointment did not differ by Medicaid expansion or insurance statuses.

Conclusion: For patients with first-time ankle sprains, access to care is more difficult using Medicaid insurance rather than private insurance, especially in Medicaid unexpanded states.

Level of evidence: Level II prospective cohort study.

医疗补助患者在未扩展州接受踝关节扭伤治疗的机会有限。
目的:我们的目标是确定各州医疗补助计划的扩展和患者的保险状况是否会影响踝关节扭伤患者获得护理的机会:方法: 我们选择了四个医疗补助扩展州(肯塔基州、路易斯安那州、爱荷华州和亚利桑那州)和未扩展州(北卡罗来纳州、阿拉巴马州、威斯康星州和德克萨斯州)。从美国骨科足踝协会(AOFAS)的目录中随机抽取了每个州的 12 家诊所(N = 96),并两次致电要求预约一名使用医疗补助保险或蓝十字蓝盾(BCBS)私人保险的首次踝关节扭伤的虚构 16 岁儿童:使用 BCBS 时,65.6% 的诊所获得了预约,使用医疗补助计划时,45.8% 的诊所获得了预约(P =.006)。在未扩大医疗补助范围的州,根据保险状况成功预约的比例存在明显差异(P = .007)。在除爱荷华州以外的所有州,使用 BCBS 的预约率均高于使用 Medicaid 的预约率。拒绝预约的 3 个主要原因是无法提供保险识别码(47.1%)、保险状况(23.5%)以及患者是否被转诊(17.6%)。医疗补助计划的扩展和保险状况不同,预约等待时间也不相同:结论:对于初次踝关节扭伤的患者而言,使用医疗补助计划保险比使用私人保险更难获得医疗服务,尤其是在医疗补助计划未扩展的州:二级前瞻性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信