Contamination of Dentin with Hemostatic Agents - Is EDTA a Valuable Decontaminant before Using a Self-etch Universal Adhesive?

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Carolin Anne Mempel, Silke Jacker-Guhr, Anne-Katrin Lührs
{"title":"Contamination of Dentin with Hemostatic Agents - Is EDTA a Valuable Decontaminant before Using a Self-etch Universal Adhesive?","authors":"Carolin Anne Mempel, Silke Jacker-Guhr, Anne-Katrin Lührs","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b3441525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effects of dentin decontamination procedures with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) after contamination with two hemostatic agents, ViscoStat (VS) and ViscoStat Clear (VSC), on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of two different universal adhesives, before and after thermocycling (TC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Dentin surfaces of 100 human caries-free molars were either contaminated with one of the hemostatic agents or contaminated and then decontaminated with EDTA before the universal adhesives Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SBU) or Prime & Bond Active (PBA) were applied in self-etch mode. Composite buildups were made and the teeth were sectioned into sticks (n = 90). Half of them immediately underwent the μTBS test, the other half after aging via TC. The data were statistically analyzed using Welch's ANOVA and the Games-Howell post-hoc test (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed between the groups (p < 0.001). When the dentin surface was contaminated with VSC, TC significantly reduced the mean bond strength, regardless of the universal adhesive. Decontamination with EDTA showed a significant decrease in bond strength after VS contamination and SBU application. The fracture analysis showed mainly adhesive fractures (78.8%) in all test groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As EDTA application did not significantly increase the μTBS of either universal adhesive in self-etch mode in-vitro, it cannot be recommended as a decontaminant.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":" ","pages":"345-354"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b3441525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effects of dentin decontamination procedures with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) after contamination with two hemostatic agents, ViscoStat (VS) and ViscoStat Clear (VSC), on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of two different universal adhesives, before and after thermocycling (TC).

Materials and methods: Dentin surfaces of 100 human caries-free molars were either contaminated with one of the hemostatic agents or contaminated and then decontaminated with EDTA before the universal adhesives Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SBU) or Prime & Bond Active (PBA) were applied in self-etch mode. Composite buildups were made and the teeth were sectioned into sticks (n = 90). Half of them immediately underwent the μTBS test, the other half after aging via TC. The data were statistically analyzed using Welch's ANOVA and the Games-Howell post-hoc test (p < 0.05).

Results: Significant differences were observed between the groups (p < 0.001). When the dentin surface was contaminated with VSC, TC significantly reduced the mean bond strength, regardless of the universal adhesive. Decontamination with EDTA showed a significant decrease in bond strength after VS contamination and SBU application. The fracture analysis showed mainly adhesive fractures (78.8%) in all test groups.

Conclusion: As EDTA application did not significantly increase the μTBS of either universal adhesive in self-etch mode in-vitro, it cannot be recommended as a decontaminant.

止血剂对牙本质的污染--在使用自酸通用粘合剂之前,EDTA 是否是一种有价值的去污剂?
目的:研究在两种止血剂 ViscoStat (VS) 和 ViscoStat Clear (VSC) 污染牙本质后使用乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)进行去污处理对两种不同通用粘合剂在热循环(TC)前后的微拉伸粘合强度(μTBS)的影响:在以自酸蚀模式使用通用粘合剂 Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SBU) 或 Prime & Bond Active (PBA) 之前,先用其中一种止血剂污染或用 EDTA 污染牙本质表面,然后再用 EDTA 去污。制作复合材料并将牙齿切成小块(n = 90)。其中一半立即进行 μTBS 测试,另一半通过 TC 老化后进行测试。采用韦尔奇方差分析和 Games-Howell 事后检验对数据进行统计分析(P < 0.05):结果:各组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。当牙本质表面受到 VSC 污染时,无论使用哪种通用粘合剂,TC 都会显著降低平均粘接强度。使用 EDTA 去污表明,在 VS 污染和使用 SBU 后,粘接强度明显下降。断裂分析表明,在所有测试组中,主要是粘合剂断裂(78.8%):结论:在体外自酸蚀模式下,使用 EDTA 并不能明显提高两种通用粘合剂的 μTBS 值,因此不能推荐使用 EDTA 作为去污剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信