Diagnosis and management of epiploic appendagitis: a single-institution 10-year experience.

IF 0.7
Riley Tan, Simon Parys, Yuki Watanabe
{"title":"Diagnosis and management of epiploic appendagitis: a single-institution 10-year experience.","authors":"Riley Tan,&nbsp;Simon Parys,&nbsp;Yuki Watanabe","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0014.8912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;b&gt;Introduction&lt;/b&gt;: Epiploic appendagitis is known to be a benign and self-limiting process, yet optimal management is not well understood. Research focused on the efficacy of treatment in this rare condition may allow future patients diagnosed with epiploic appendagitis to be treated accordingly with the best evidence-based medical practice.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Aim&lt;/b&gt;: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnosis, compare management options and follow up epiploic appendagitis. &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Materials and methods&lt;/b&gt;: This retrospective study included all patients over 18 years of age who were treated in a large tertiary hospital in the years 2009-2019 with a confirmed diagnosis of epiploic appendagitis and no coexisting acute intra-abdominal pathologies. Patients' health information was recorded and analysed.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results&lt;/b&gt;: As many as 78 patients were diagnosed with epiploic appendagitis over a 10-year observation period. A minor male predominance (55%) and a broad range of ages at the moment of diagnosis (18-75) were found, with diabetes (n = 10) being the most common comorbidity in this condition . In the majority of cases, the disease was located in the sigmoid (41%) and descending colon (35%). Diagnosis was primarily based on imaging (computerised tomography 91%, ultrasonography 2.6%). Six percent of patients were diagnosed during surgery and these patients recovered with smaller rates of readmissions and recurrences (P &lt; 0.05). Patients given opioids on discharge were less likely to be readmitted to hospital (P &lt; 0.05), while those given antibiotics had a longer inpatient stay (P &lt; 0.05) with no change in readmission rates (P = 0.78) or recurrence rates (P = 0.48). &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Discussion&lt;/b&gt;: Managing epiploic appendagitis with antibiotics is shown to have no effect on patient outcomes, while opioid use for pain control did not affect the length of hospital stay but it reduced the number of readmissions when compared to simple analgesics alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":501107,"journal":{"name":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","volume":" ","pages":"20-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>: Epiploic appendagitis is known to be a benign and self-limiting process, yet optimal management is not well understood. Research focused on the efficacy of treatment in this rare condition may allow future patients diagnosed with epiploic appendagitis to be treated accordingly with the best evidence-based medical practice.<br/><b>Aim</b>: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnosis, compare management options and follow up epiploic appendagitis. <br><b>Materials and methods</b>: This retrospective study included all patients over 18 years of age who were treated in a large tertiary hospital in the years 2009-2019 with a confirmed diagnosis of epiploic appendagitis and no coexisting acute intra-abdominal pathologies. Patients' health information was recorded and analysed.<br/><b>Results</b>: As many as 78 patients were diagnosed with epiploic appendagitis over a 10-year observation period. A minor male predominance (55%) and a broad range of ages at the moment of diagnosis (18-75) were found, with diabetes (n = 10) being the most common comorbidity in this condition . In the majority of cases, the disease was located in the sigmoid (41%) and descending colon (35%). Diagnosis was primarily based on imaging (computerised tomography 91%, ultrasonography 2.6%). Six percent of patients were diagnosed during surgery and these patients recovered with smaller rates of readmissions and recurrences (P < 0.05). Patients given opioids on discharge were less likely to be readmitted to hospital (P < 0.05), while those given antibiotics had a longer inpatient stay (P < 0.05) with no change in readmission rates (P = 0.78) or recurrence rates (P = 0.48). <br/><b>Discussion</b>: Managing epiploic appendagitis with antibiotics is shown to have no effect on patient outcomes, while opioid use for pain control did not affect the length of hospital stay but it reduced the number of readmissions when compared to simple analgesics alone.

网膜阑尾炎的诊断和治疗:一所医院10年的经验。
引言</b>:众所周知,网膜阑尾炎是一种良性和自限性的过程,但最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。关注这种罕见疾病的治疗效果的研究,可能会使未来诊断为网膜阑尾炎的患者根据最佳循证医学实践进行相应的治疗。<br/ < < >< >< > /b>:本研究的目的是探讨网膜阑尾炎的诊断、比较治疗方案和随访。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入2009-2019年在某大型三级医院就诊的所有年龄在18岁以上、确诊为网膜阑尾炎且无并发急性腹腔内病变的患者。记录和分析患者的健康信息。<br/>< >结果</ >;在10年的观察期间,多达78例患者被诊断为网膜阑尾炎。男性占少数优势(55%),诊断时的年龄范围很广(18-75岁),糖尿病(n = 10)是这种情况最常见的合并症。大多数病例位于乙状结肠(41%)和降结肠(35%)。诊断主要基于影像学(计算机断层扫描91%,超声检查2.6%)。6%的患者在手术中被诊断出来,这些患者的再入院和复发率较低(P <0.05)。出院时给予阿片类药物的患者再入院的可能性较小(P <0.05),而给予抗生素的患者住院时间更长(P <0.05),再入院率(P = 0.78)和复发率(P = 0.48)无变化。<br/ < < >讨论</ >< />:使用抗生素治疗网膜阑尾炎对患者的预后没有影响,而使用阿片类药物控制疼痛不影响住院时间,但与单独使用简单止痛药相比,它减少了再入院的次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信