Generic selection criteria for safety and patient benefit [XI]: Usability scores of brand-name and generic tapes containing sodium diclofenac by questionnaire survey.

Drug discoveries & therapeutics Pub Date : 2022-11-20 Epub Date: 2022-10-20 DOI:10.5582/ddt.2022.01071
Mitsuru Nozawa, Ako Gannichida, Yuko Wada, Miyuki Kumazawa, Fumiyoshi Ishii, Ken-Ichi Shimokawa
{"title":"Generic selection criteria for safety and patient benefit [XI]: Usability scores of brand-name and generic tapes containing sodium diclofenac by questionnaire survey.","authors":"Mitsuru Nozawa,&nbsp;Ako Gannichida,&nbsp;Yuko Wada,&nbsp;Miyuki Kumazawa,&nbsp;Fumiyoshi Ishii,&nbsp;Ken-Ichi Shimokawa","doi":"10.5582/ddt.2022.01071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and usability scores of different tape treatments and examine the scores in relation to the mechanical characteristics of the tape formulation. A questionnaire for the assessment of comfort level and satisfaction with two brand-name (Naboal, Voltaren) and four generic tapes (Yutoku, Teikoku, Rakool, Towa) containing sodium diclofenac was developed and then applied to 12 healthy volunteers. Results showed that Voltaren was difficult to apply to the skin and easier to peel off the skin than Naboal (p < 0.01). Moreover, Rakool was easier to peel than Naboal (p < 0.05). The mechanically measured peeling force was associated with pain during peeling off (r = -0.65), and the measured value of bending rigidity was associated with ease of peeling off (r = -0.97). The knowledge obtained regarding the influence of pharmaceutical properties on the degree of satisfaction with and usability of different tape formulations may be useful for supporting the selection of generic tapes tailored to individual needs or pharmacist preferences, and thus improve treatment adherence and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520606,"journal":{"name":"Drug discoveries & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"210-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug discoveries & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5582/ddt.2022.01071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and usability scores of different tape treatments and examine the scores in relation to the mechanical characteristics of the tape formulation. A questionnaire for the assessment of comfort level and satisfaction with two brand-name (Naboal, Voltaren) and four generic tapes (Yutoku, Teikoku, Rakool, Towa) containing sodium diclofenac was developed and then applied to 12 healthy volunteers. Results showed that Voltaren was difficult to apply to the skin and easier to peel off the skin than Naboal (p < 0.01). Moreover, Rakool was easier to peel than Naboal (p < 0.05). The mechanically measured peeling force was associated with pain during peeling off (r = -0.65), and the measured value of bending rigidity was associated with ease of peeling off (r = -0.97). The knowledge obtained regarding the influence of pharmaceutical properties on the degree of satisfaction with and usability of different tape formulations may be useful for supporting the selection of generic tapes tailored to individual needs or pharmacist preferences, and thus improve treatment adherence and clinical outcomes.

本研究的目的是评估不同胶带治疗的患者满意度和可用性分数,并检查分数与胶带配方的机械特性的关系。采用问卷法对含双氯芬酸钠的两种品牌(Naboal、volaren)和四种普通胶带(Yutoku、Teikoku、Rakool、Towa)进行舒适度和满意度评估,并应用于12名健康志愿者。结果表明,与Naboal相比,伏他仑较难贴于皮肤,较易剥落(p < 0.01)。Rakool比Naboal更易脱皮(p < 0.05)。机械测量的剥离力与剥离过程中的疼痛相关(r = -0.65),弯曲刚度测量值与剥离的容易程度相关(r = -0.97)。所获得的关于药物特性对不同胶带配方的满意程度和可用性的影响的知识,可能有助于根据个人需求或药剂师偏好选择通用胶带,从而提高治疗依从性和临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书