Implementation of a Medication Reconciliation Risk Stratification Tool Integrated within an electronic health record: A Case Series of Three Academic Medical Centers

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Eugene S. Chu , Robert El-Kareh , Anthony Biondo , John Chang , Seth Hartman , Trina Huynh , Kathryn Medders , Andrea Nguyen , Nancy Yam , Loutfi Succari , Kyle Koenig , Mark V. Williams , Jeffrey Schnipper
{"title":"Implementation of a Medication Reconciliation Risk Stratification Tool Integrated within an electronic health record: A Case Series of Three Academic Medical Centers","authors":"Eugene S. Chu ,&nbsp;Robert El-Kareh ,&nbsp;Anthony Biondo ,&nbsp;John Chang ,&nbsp;Seth Hartman ,&nbsp;Trina Huynh ,&nbsp;Kathryn Medders ,&nbsp;Andrea Nguyen ,&nbsp;Nancy Yam ,&nbsp;Loutfi Succari ,&nbsp;Kyle Koenig ,&nbsp;Mark V. Williams ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Schnipper","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Medication errors during transitions of care are common, dangerous and costly. Medication reconciliation can help mitigate this risk, but it is a complex and time-consuming process when performed properly. Increasingly, pharmacy staff have been engaged to help improve medication reconciliation. However, many organizations lack the resources and staff required to perform accurate medication histories and other reconciliation tasks on all patients. We describe how three academic medical centers implemented risk scoring systems to allocate limited pharmacy resources to patients with the highest likelihood of medication reconciliation related errors. We found that (1) development of a tailored medication risk scoring system and integration into the electronic health record is feasible, (2) workflow around the risk calculator is critical to the success of the implementation, and (3) the complex coordination of professional disciplines during the medication reconciliation process remains an ongoing challenge at all three institutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"10 4","pages":"Article 100654"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076422000434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Medication errors during transitions of care are common, dangerous and costly. Medication reconciliation can help mitigate this risk, but it is a complex and time-consuming process when performed properly. Increasingly, pharmacy staff have been engaged to help improve medication reconciliation. However, many organizations lack the resources and staff required to perform accurate medication histories and other reconciliation tasks on all patients. We describe how three academic medical centers implemented risk scoring systems to allocate limited pharmacy resources to patients with the highest likelihood of medication reconciliation related errors. We found that (1) development of a tailored medication risk scoring system and integration into the electronic health record is feasible, (2) workflow around the risk calculator is critical to the success of the implementation, and (3) the complex coordination of professional disciplines during the medication reconciliation process remains an ongoing challenge at all three institutions.

集成在电子健康记录中的药物和解风险分层工具的实现:三个学术医疗中心的案例系列
护理过渡期间的用药错误是常见的、危险的和昂贵的。药物调节可以帮助减轻这种风险,但如果执行得当,这是一个复杂且耗时的过程。越来越多的药房工作人员已经参与到帮助改善药物和解。然而,许多组织缺乏对所有患者执行准确用药史和其他协调任务所需的资源和人员。我们描述了三个学术医疗中心如何实施风险评分系统,将有限的药房资源分配给最有可能出现药物和解相关错误的患者。我们发现:(1)开发量身定制的用药风险评分系统并将其集成到电子健康记录中是可行的;(2)围绕风险计算器的工作流程对成功实施至关重要;(3)在用药调节过程中,专业学科的复杂协调仍然是这三家机构面临的一个持续挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信