Ten-year mixed-method evaluation of prelicensure health professional student self-reported learning in an interfaculty pain curriculum.

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Pain Reports Pub Date : 2022-09-14 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001030
Craig M Dale, Iacopo Cioffi, Laura Murphy, Sylvia Langlois, Renata Musa, Bonnie Stevens
{"title":"Ten-year mixed-method evaluation of prelicensure health professional student self-reported learning in an interfaculty pain curriculum.","authors":"Craig M Dale,&nbsp;Iacopo Cioffi,&nbsp;Laura Murphy,&nbsp;Sylvia Langlois,&nbsp;Renata Musa,&nbsp;Bonnie Stevens","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Student perspectives on interprofessional pain education are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate ratings of knowledge acquisition and effective presentation methods for prelicensure health professional students attending the University of Toronto Centre for the Study of Pain Interfaculty Pain Curriculum (Canada).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 10-year (2009-2019) retrospective longitudinal mixed-methods approach comprising analysis and integration of quantitative and qualitative data sets was used to evaluate 5 core University of Toronto Centre for the Study of Pain Interfaculty Pain Curriculum learning sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10, 693 students were enrolled (2009-2019) with a mean annual attendance of 972 students (±SD:102). The mean proportion of students rating \"agree/strongly agree\" for knowledge acquisition and effective presentation methods across sessions was 79.3% (±SD:3.4) and 76.7% (±SD:6.0), respectively. Knowledge acquisition or presentation effectiveness scores increased, respectively, over time for 4 core sessions: online self-study pain mechanisms module (<i>P</i> = 0.03/<i>P</i> < 0.001), online self-study opioids module (<i>P</i> = 0.04/<i>P</i> = 0.019), individually selected in-person topical pain sessions (<i>P</i> = 0.03/<i>P</i> < 0.001), and in-person patient or interprofessional panel session (<i>P</i> = 0.03). Qualitative data corroborated rating scores and expanded insight into student expectations for knowledge acquisition to inform real-world clinical practice and interprofessional collaboration; presentation effectiveness corresponded with smaller session size, individually selected sessions, case-based scenarios, embedded knowledge appraisal, and opportunities to meaningfully interact with presenters and peers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated positive and increasing prelicensure student ratings of knowledge acquisition and effective presentation methods across multifaceted learning sessions in an interfaculty pain curriculum. This study has implications for pain curriculum design aimed at promoting students' collaborative, patient-centered working skills.<b>See commentary:</b> Trouvin A-P. \"Ten-year mixed method evaluation of prelicensure health professional student self-reported learning in an interfaculty pain curriculum\": a view on pain education. PAIN Rep 2022;7:e1031.Students attending learning sessions at the University of Toronto Interfaculty Pain Curriculum (2009-2019) in Toronto, Canada, self-report high ratings of knowledge acquisition and effective presentation methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":" ","pages":"e1030"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9478270/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Student perspectives on interprofessional pain education are lacking.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate ratings of knowledge acquisition and effective presentation methods for prelicensure health professional students attending the University of Toronto Centre for the Study of Pain Interfaculty Pain Curriculum (Canada).

Methods: A 10-year (2009-2019) retrospective longitudinal mixed-methods approach comprising analysis and integration of quantitative and qualitative data sets was used to evaluate 5 core University of Toronto Centre for the Study of Pain Interfaculty Pain Curriculum learning sessions.

Results: A total of 10, 693 students were enrolled (2009-2019) with a mean annual attendance of 972 students (±SD:102). The mean proportion of students rating "agree/strongly agree" for knowledge acquisition and effective presentation methods across sessions was 79.3% (±SD:3.4) and 76.7% (±SD:6.0), respectively. Knowledge acquisition or presentation effectiveness scores increased, respectively, over time for 4 core sessions: online self-study pain mechanisms module (P = 0.03/P < 0.001), online self-study opioids module (P = 0.04/P = 0.019), individually selected in-person topical pain sessions (P = 0.03/P < 0.001), and in-person patient or interprofessional panel session (P = 0.03). Qualitative data corroborated rating scores and expanded insight into student expectations for knowledge acquisition to inform real-world clinical practice and interprofessional collaboration; presentation effectiveness corresponded with smaller session size, individually selected sessions, case-based scenarios, embedded knowledge appraisal, and opportunities to meaningfully interact with presenters and peers.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated positive and increasing prelicensure student ratings of knowledge acquisition and effective presentation methods across multifaceted learning sessions in an interfaculty pain curriculum. This study has implications for pain curriculum design aimed at promoting students' collaborative, patient-centered working skills.See commentary: Trouvin A-P. "Ten-year mixed method evaluation of prelicensure health professional student self-reported learning in an interfaculty pain curriculum": a view on pain education. PAIN Rep 2022;7:e1031.Students attending learning sessions at the University of Toronto Interfaculty Pain Curriculum (2009-2019) in Toronto, Canada, self-report high ratings of knowledge acquisition and effective presentation methods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

跨院系疼痛课程中执业前健康专业学生自述学习的十年混合方法评价。
引言:缺乏学生对跨专业疼痛教育的看法。目的:本研究的目的是评估参加多伦多大学疼痛研究中心(加拿大)疼痛课程的准医师健康专业学生的知识获取等级和有效的陈述方法。方法:采用一项为期10年(2009-2019)的回顾性纵向混合方法,包括定量和定性数据集的分析和整合,对多伦多大学疼痛研究中心的5个核心课程进行评估。结果:2009-2019年共招收学生10,693人,平均每年出勤率为972人(±SD:102)。学生对知识获取和有效的演讲方法评价为“同意/非常同意”的平均比例分别为79.3%(±SD:3.4)和76.7%(±SD:6.0)。随着时间的推移,4个核心课程的知识获取或陈述有效性得分分别增加:在线自学疼痛机制模块(P = 0.03/P < 0.001),在线自学阿片类药物模块(P = 0.04/P = 0.019),单独选择的局部疼痛课程(P = 0.03/P < 0.001),面对面的患者或跨专业小组会议(P = 0.03)。定性数据证实了评级分数,并扩大了对学生知识获取期望的洞察力,为现实世界的临床实践和跨专业合作提供信息;演示效果与较小的会议规模、单独选择的会议、基于案例的场景、嵌入式知识评估以及与演示者和同行进行有意义的互动的机会相对应。结论:本研究表明,在跨学院疼痛课程的多面学习环节中,学生对知识获取和有效的演讲方法的评分呈积极和上升趋势。本研究对疼痛课程设计具有启示意义,旨在促进学生的合作,以病人为中心的工作技能。参见评论:Trouvin A-P。“10年混合方法评价医学生自我报告学习的院系间疼痛课程”:对疼痛教育的看法。PAIN Rep 2022;7:e1031。参加加拿大多伦多大学跨学院疼痛课程(2009-2019)学习课程的学生自我报告了知识获取和有效表达方法的高评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信