The Bender Gestalt Test is useful for clinically diagnosing dementia with Lewy bodies: Analysis of its sensitivity, specificity, and clinical characteristics of the figure copy.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-19 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2022.2122059
Norio Murayama, Kazumi Ota, Eizo Iseki
{"title":"The Bender Gestalt Test is useful for clinically diagnosing dementia with Lewy bodies: Analysis of its sensitivity, specificity, and clinical characteristics of the figure copy.","authors":"Norio Murayama, Kazumi Ota, Eizo Iseki","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2022.2122059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A previous study that evaluated the ability of the Bender Gestalt Test (BGT) to discriminate between dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) suggested that a total score of 98 is the optimal cutoff value for discriminating between these two diseases and that DLB tends to exhibit unique errors; i.e., \"element deformation\" and \"gestalt destruction.\" The objectives of the present study were: (1) to examine the sensitivity and specificity of a total BGT score of 98 as a cutoff value in greater numbers of DLB patients than in the previous study, (2) to set a new cutoff value if a cutoff value of 98 is not optimal, and (3) to clarify the frequency of element deformation and gestalt destruction in DLB patients. The participants were 133 DLB patients, 65 AD patients, and 30 cognitively normal elderly people. All of the participants underwent the Mini-Mental State Examination, BGT, and brain magnetic resonance imaging. As a result, the total BGT score cutoff value of 98 showed low sensitivity (0.58), and a cutoff value of 84 was indicated to be the optimal cutoff value for discriminating between DLB and AD. In addition, 32 out of 133 DLB patients and one out of 65 AD patients exhibited element deformation or gestalt destruction. This study suggested that the BGT is a useful neuropsychological test for differentiating DLB from AD. In addition, the need to evaluate the spatial and perceptual difficulties of DLB patients with various types of visual stimulation is also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2122059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A previous study that evaluated the ability of the Bender Gestalt Test (BGT) to discriminate between dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) suggested that a total score of 98 is the optimal cutoff value for discriminating between these two diseases and that DLB tends to exhibit unique errors; i.e., "element deformation" and "gestalt destruction." The objectives of the present study were: (1) to examine the sensitivity and specificity of a total BGT score of 98 as a cutoff value in greater numbers of DLB patients than in the previous study, (2) to set a new cutoff value if a cutoff value of 98 is not optimal, and (3) to clarify the frequency of element deformation and gestalt destruction in DLB patients. The participants were 133 DLB patients, 65 AD patients, and 30 cognitively normal elderly people. All of the participants underwent the Mini-Mental State Examination, BGT, and brain magnetic resonance imaging. As a result, the total BGT score cutoff value of 98 showed low sensitivity (0.58), and a cutoff value of 84 was indicated to be the optimal cutoff value for discriminating between DLB and AD. In addition, 32 out of 133 DLB patients and one out of 65 AD patients exhibited element deformation or gestalt destruction. This study suggested that the BGT is a useful neuropsychological test for differentiating DLB from AD. In addition, the need to evaluate the spatial and perceptual difficulties of DLB patients with various types of visual stimulation is also discussed.

本德格式塔测试有助于临床诊断路易体痴呆症:分析其敏感性、特异性和图形拷贝的临床特征。
之前的一项研究评估了本德格式塔测验(Bender Gestalt Test,BGT)区分路易体痴呆(DLB)和阿尔兹海默病(AD)的能力,结果表明总分 98 分是区分这两种疾病的最佳临界值,而且 DLB 往往表现出独特的错误,即 "元素变形 "和 "格式塔破坏"。本研究的目的是(1)与之前的研究相比,在更多的 DLB 患者中检验以 BGT 总分 98 分作为分界值的敏感性和特异性;(2)如果 98 分的分界值不是最佳值,则设定一个新的分界值;(3)明确 DLB 患者中元素变形和构象破坏的频率。参与者包括 133 名 DLB 患者、65 名 AD 患者和 30 名认知正常的老年人。所有参与者均接受了迷你精神状态检查、BGT 和脑磁共振成像。结果显示,BGT 总分的临界值为 98,灵敏度较低(0.58),而临界值 84 则是区分 DLB 和 AD 的最佳临界值。此外,133 名 DLB 患者中有 32 人、65 名 AD 患者中有 1 人表现出元素变形或构象破坏。这项研究表明,BGT 是区分 DLB 和 AD 的有效神经心理学测试。此外,研究还讨论了利用各种视觉刺激评估 DLB 患者空间和知觉障碍的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信