Screw loosening in angulation-correcting single implant restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"Screw loosening in angulation-correcting single implant restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><p>Various options are available to allow angle correction for screw-retained restorations for malaligned implants, including angled abutments, angled screw channel abutments, and angled implants. However, the effect these angle correction components have on prosthetic screw loosening is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effect of angled abutments, angled screw channel abutments, and angled implants on prosthetic screw loosening.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This manuscript followed the Preferred Reporting Items for the Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Searches were performed through 31 December 2021 in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science with no year limit targeting in vitro studies evaluating the effect of angulation correction components on screw loosening.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 460 articles were identified. After removing duplicates, 306 titles were screened. Nine of the remaining 36 articles selected for full-text analysis met the selection criteria. The qualitative analysis used data from 394 implants. All studies featured straight abutments as the control group, and, in 8 studies, the angle correction component was included on the level of the abutment. Only in 1 study was the angle correction component at the level of the implant. The angle correction of the prosthetic component varied from 0 degrees in all studies up to a maximum correction of 30 degrees. Statistically significant increases in screw loosening with increasing abutment angle correction were reported by multiple authors (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). However, other articles reported nonsignificant differences in screw loosening because of angulation after cyclic loading (<em>P</em>&gt;.05). The only study investigating angle correction at the implant level found significantly less screw loosening (<em>P</em>&lt;.05) in the angled implant group compared with the nonangled implant group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Several options are available to correct discrepancies between the surgical axis and the ideal prosthetic axis for rehabilitations supported by dental implants. The current evidence does not clearly indicate the superiority of any single solution for minimizing screw loosening.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391322004838","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem

Various options are available to allow angle correction for screw-retained restorations for malaligned implants, including angled abutments, angled screw channel abutments, and angled implants. However, the effect these angle correction components have on prosthetic screw loosening is unclear.

Purpose

The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effect of angled abutments, angled screw channel abutments, and angled implants on prosthetic screw loosening.

Material and methods

This manuscript followed the Preferred Reporting Items for the Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Searches were performed through 31 December 2021 in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science with no year limit targeting in vitro studies evaluating the effect of angulation correction components on screw loosening.

Results

A total of 460 articles were identified. After removing duplicates, 306 titles were screened. Nine of the remaining 36 articles selected for full-text analysis met the selection criteria. The qualitative analysis used data from 394 implants. All studies featured straight abutments as the control group, and, in 8 studies, the angle correction component was included on the level of the abutment. Only in 1 study was the angle correction component at the level of the implant. The angle correction of the prosthetic component varied from 0 degrees in all studies up to a maximum correction of 30 degrees. Statistically significant increases in screw loosening with increasing abutment angle correction were reported by multiple authors (P<.05). However, other articles reported nonsignificant differences in screw loosening because of angulation after cyclic loading (P>.05). The only study investigating angle correction at the implant level found significantly less screw loosening (P<.05) in the angled implant group compared with the nonangled implant group.

Conclusions

Several options are available to correct discrepancies between the surgical axis and the ideal prosthetic axis for rehabilitations supported by dental implants. The current evidence does not clearly indicate the superiority of any single solution for minimizing screw loosening.

角度校正单种植体修复中的螺钉松动:体外研究的系统回顾。
问题陈述:对于种植体错位的螺钉固位修复,有多种角度校正方法可供选择,包括倾斜基台、倾斜螺钉通道基台和倾斜种植体。目的:本系统综述旨在评估成角基台、成角螺钉通道基台和成角种植体对修复体螺钉松动的影响:本稿件遵循系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明。在 PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 中进行了检索,检索时间截止到 2021 年 12 月 31 日,没有年份限制,目标是评估角度矫正组件对螺钉松动影响的体外研究:结果:共发现 460 篇文章。在去除重复文章后,筛选出 306 篇文章的标题。在剩余的 36 篇文章中,有 9 篇符合全文分析的选择标准。定性分析使用了来自 394 个种植体的数据。所有研究都将直基台作为对照组,其中有 8 项研究在基台水平上包含了角度校正组件。只有一项研究将角度校正组件置于种植体水平。在所有研究中,修复体的角度校正从 0 度到最大 30 度不等。多位作者报告称,随着基台角度校正的增加,螺钉松动率也会有统计学意义的增加(P.05)。唯一一项在种植体水平进行角度校正的研究发现,螺钉松动明显减少(PC结论):在牙科种植体支持的修复中,有几种方法可以纠正手术轴线和理想修复轴线之间的差异。目前的证据并不能清楚地表明任何一种方案在减少螺钉松动方面的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信