Development and Validation of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire: An Analytical Study.

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY

World Journal of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.52547/wjps.11.2.68

Sattar Mahmoudi, Mehrnosh Rabbani Zadeh

{"title":"Development and Validation of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire: An Analytical Study.","authors":"Sattar Mahmoudi, Mehrnosh Rabbani Zadeh","doi":"10.52547/wjps.11.2.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) is an easy-to-use questionnaire that allows comprehensive assessment of rhinoplasty-related patient satisfaction. However, the normal values for this questionnaire are not known. Therefore, we aim to validate the ROE questionnaire adapted to Iranian culture.Method: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, the statistical population consisted of applicants for cosmetic surgery referred to Shahid Rajaee Hospital, Shiraz, Iran, in the autumn and winter of 2017. Two hundred individuals participated in this research by a convenience sampling method. The questionnaire (ROE) was translated to Persian and backward translated to English by independent medical extern Persian speakers with complete English proficiency. The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 23 using exploratory factor analysis.Results: The findings showed that the Cronbach's Alpha of composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE); overall, values above 0.4 were favorable in this measure. In addition, the AVE ranged from 0.50 to 0.59, which confirmed convergent validity. The AVEs of each factor was higher than the squared correlations and confirmed discriminant validity within the constructs. In the presence of significant factor loadings and composite reliability greater than 0.70, convergence validity was confirmed. Furthermore, the higher AVEs for each factor were compared to the squared correlations to confirm discriminant validity.Conclusion: The Iranian version of ROE is a valid instrument to assess results in rhinoplasty patients.","PeriodicalId":23736,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/cf/wjps-11-68.PMC9446128.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/wjps.11.2.68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) is an easy-to-use questionnaire that allows comprehensive assessment of rhinoplasty-related patient satisfaction. However, the normal values for this questionnaire are not known. Therefore, we aim to validate the ROE questionnaire adapted to Iranian culture.

Method: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, the statistical population consisted of applicants for cosmetic surgery referred to Shahid Rajaee Hospital, Shiraz, Iran, in the autumn and winter of 2017. Two hundred individuals participated in this research by a convenience sampling method. The questionnaire (ROE) was translated to Persian and backward translated to English by independent medical extern Persian speakers with complete English proficiency. The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 23 using exploratory factor analysis.

Results: The findings showed that the Cronbach's Alpha of composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE); overall, values above 0.4 were favorable in this measure. In addition, the AVE ranged from 0.50 to 0.59, which confirmed convergent validity. The AVEs of each factor was higher than the squared correlations and confirmed discriminant validity within the constructs. In the presence of significant factor loadings and composite reliability greater than 0.70, convergence validity was confirmed. Furthermore, the higher AVEs for each factor were compared to the squared correlations to confirm discriminant validity.

Conclusion: The Iranian version of ROE is a valid instrument to assess results in rhinoplasty patients.

查看原文本刊更多论文

鼻整形效果评估(ROE)问卷的开发和验证:一项分析研究。

背景:鼻整形结果评估(ROE)是一份易于使用的问卷，可以全面评估鼻整形相关患者的满意度。然而，这个问卷的正常值是未知的。因此，我们的目标是验证适合伊朗文化的ROE问卷。方法:在本横断面描述性研究中，统计人群包括2017年秋冬在伊朗设拉子Shahid Rajaee医院进行整容手术的申请人。200人通过方便抽样的方法参与了这项研究。问卷(ROE)由具有完全英语水平的独立医疗外部波斯语人士翻译成波斯语和反翻译成英语。采用SPSS软件23版进行探索性因子分析。结果:研究结果表明:综合信度(CR)和平均方差提取(AVE)的Cronbach's Alpha;总体而言，该指标高于0.4是有利的。此外，AVE在0.50 ~ 0.59之间，证实了收敛效度。各因子的ave均高于相关系数的平方，证实了构念内的判别效度。当因子负荷显著且复合信度大于0.70时，收敛效度得到证实。此外，将每个因素的较高ave与平方相关进行比较，以确认区分效度。结论:伊朗版ROE是评估鼻整形患者效果的有效工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

World Journal of Plastic Surgery SURGERY-

自引率

11.10%

发文量