Jordan B. Lee , Keisho Katayama , Philip J. Millar
{"title":"Upper and lower limb muscle sympathetic responses to contralateral exercise in healthy humans: A pilot study","authors":"Jordan B. Lee , Keisho Katayama , Philip J. Millar","doi":"10.1016/j.autneu.2022.103024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) is similar between limbs at rest, although a subset of MSNA bursts do demonstrate limb-specific discharge. Whether limb differences in MSNA synchronicity are present during exercise remains controversial. We concurrently measured MSNA from the radial and fibular nerves at rest and during rhythmic handgrip (RHG), static handgrip (SHG), and post-exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO). MSNA burst frequency and incidence were similar between nerve sites during all conditions. Synchronous bursts resulted in larger increases in sympathetic-blood pressure transduction compared to isolated bursts (∆ + 3.6 ± 2.1 vs. +2.3 ± 2.4 mmHg, </span><em>P</em> = 0.01). The proportion of bursts firing synchronously between nerves at rest was slightly increased during RHG ([rest vs. exercise; mean ± SD] 45.3 ± 7.1 vs. 61.6 ± 7.2 %) and similar during SHG (56.2 ± 7.2 vs. 54 ± 10.6 %). In contrast, burst firing synchronicity increased during PECO (83.8 ± 12.4 %) alongside larger burst amplitudes. Inter-limb differences in resting MSNA are preserved during handgrip exercise, whereas isolated metaboreflex activation results in greater burst synchronization between limbs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55410,"journal":{"name":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566070222000832","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) is similar between limbs at rest, although a subset of MSNA bursts do demonstrate limb-specific discharge. Whether limb differences in MSNA synchronicity are present during exercise remains controversial. We concurrently measured MSNA from the radial and fibular nerves at rest and during rhythmic handgrip (RHG), static handgrip (SHG), and post-exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO). MSNA burst frequency and incidence were similar between nerve sites during all conditions. Synchronous bursts resulted in larger increases in sympathetic-blood pressure transduction compared to isolated bursts (∆ + 3.6 ± 2.1 vs. +2.3 ± 2.4 mmHg, P = 0.01). The proportion of bursts firing synchronously between nerves at rest was slightly increased during RHG ([rest vs. exercise; mean ± SD] 45.3 ± 7.1 vs. 61.6 ± 7.2 %) and similar during SHG (56.2 ± 7.2 vs. 54 ± 10.6 %). In contrast, burst firing synchronicity increased during PECO (83.8 ± 12.4 %) alongside larger burst amplitudes. Inter-limb differences in resting MSNA are preserved during handgrip exercise, whereas isolated metaboreflex activation results in greater burst synchronization between limbs.
肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA)在四肢休息时是相似的,尽管MSNA爆发的一个子集确实表现出肢体特异性放电。肢体在运动过程中是否存在MSNA同步性的差异仍然存在争议。我们同时测量了静息、有节奏握力(RHG)、静态握力(SHG)和运动后循环闭塞(PECO)时桡骨和腓骨神经的MSNA。在所有情况下,不同神经部位的MSNA爆发频率和发生率相似。与孤立爆发相比,同步爆发导致交感血压转导增加更大(∆+ 3.6±2.1 vs +2.3±2.4 mmHg, P = 0.01)。在RHG期间,休息时神经间同步放电的比例略有增加(休息vs.运动;均值±SD) 45.3±7.1和61.6±7.2%)和类似宋惠乔期间(56.2±7.2 vs . 54±10.6%)。相比之下,PECO期间爆发发射同步性增加(83.8±12.4%),同时爆发振幅增大。在握力运动中,静息时肢体间的MSNA差异被保留,而孤立的代谢反射激活导致肢体间更大的爆发同步。
期刊介绍:
This is an international journal with broad coverage of all aspects of the autonomic nervous system in man and animals. The main areas of interest include the innervation of blood vessels and viscera, autonomic ganglia, efferent and afferent autonomic pathways, and autonomic nuclei and pathways in the central nervous system.
The Editors will consider papers that deal with any aspect of the autonomic nervous system, including structure, physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, development, evolution, ageing, behavioural aspects, integrative role and influence on emotional and physical states of the body. Interdisciplinary studies will be encouraged. Studies dealing with human pathology will be also welcome.