Long versus short segment with intermediate screw fixation for burst fractures of thoracolumbar junction: radiological and clinical results.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgical sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-16 DOI:10.23736/S0390-5616.22.05794-0
Rossella Rispoli, Mahmoud Abousayed, Alaa A Hamed, Barbara Cappelletto
{"title":"Long versus short segment with intermediate screw fixation for burst fractures of thoracolumbar junction: radiological and clinical results.","authors":"Rossella Rispoli, Mahmoud Abousayed, Alaa A Hamed, Barbara Cappelletto","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.22.05794-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long segment fixation has been frequently used to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures. In our study we want to compare the long and short segment with intermediate screw fixation of thoracolumbar junction burst fractures in relation to radiological and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected the data of 115 patients, with thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2) burst fracture A3 or A4, according to AO Classification. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A was treated by long segment fixation. Group B was treated by short segment fixation. At admission, after surgery, and at 12-month follow-up the patients were radiographically assessed for local kyphotic angle using the Cobb method. Patients were clinically evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference of the preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 12-month follow-up Cobb angle was significant in both groups (P=0.018). The mean difference of the preoperative and immediate postoperative Cobb angle, Δ1, was significantly greater in group A than in group B (P=0.038), indicating that the Cobb angle correction immediately postoperative was better in patients with double level fixation. The mean difference of the immediate postoperative and 12-month follow-up Cobb angle, Δ2, was significantly greater in group A than in group B (P=0.007), indicating that the maintenance of local Cobb angle correction was better in patients with double level, long fixation. There was no difference in VAS values between group B (single) and group A (double) segment fixation immediately postoperatively (P=0.356) or after 12 months (P=0.147).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In A3 and A4 thoracolumbar junction fractures, long segment fixation can correct the local kyphosis Cobb angle and maintain the correction at 12-month follow-up better than short segment fixation with intermediate screws in the fractured vertebra. However, the radiological difference was not predictive of clinical results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.22.05794-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long segment fixation has been frequently used to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures. In our study we want to compare the long and short segment with intermediate screw fixation of thoracolumbar junction burst fractures in relation to radiological and clinical outcomes.

Methods: We collected the data of 115 patients, with thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2) burst fracture A3 or A4, according to AO Classification. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A was treated by long segment fixation. Group B was treated by short segment fixation. At admission, after surgery, and at 12-month follow-up the patients were radiographically assessed for local kyphotic angle using the Cobb method. Patients were clinically evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back pain.

Results: The mean difference of the preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 12-month follow-up Cobb angle was significant in both groups (P=0.018). The mean difference of the preoperative and immediate postoperative Cobb angle, Δ1, was significantly greater in group A than in group B (P=0.038), indicating that the Cobb angle correction immediately postoperative was better in patients with double level fixation. The mean difference of the immediate postoperative and 12-month follow-up Cobb angle, Δ2, was significantly greater in group A than in group B (P=0.007), indicating that the maintenance of local Cobb angle correction was better in patients with double level, long fixation. There was no difference in VAS values between group B (single) and group A (double) segment fixation immediately postoperatively (P=0.356) or after 12 months (P=0.147).

Conclusions: In A3 and A4 thoracolumbar junction fractures, long segment fixation can correct the local kyphosis Cobb angle and maintain the correction at 12-month follow-up better than short segment fixation with intermediate screws in the fractured vertebra. However, the radiological difference was not predictive of clinical results.

胸腰椎交界处爆裂性骨折的长段与短段中间螺钉固定术:放射学和临床结果。
背景:胸腰椎爆裂性骨折常用长段固定治疗。在我们的研究中,我们希望比较长段和短段与中间螺钉固定胸腰椎交界处爆裂性骨折的放射学和临床结果:我们收集了 115 例胸腰椎交界处(T11-L2)A3 或 A4 爆裂性骨折患者的数据,根据 AO 分类。患者被分为两组。A 组采用长段固定治疗。B 组采用短节段固定治疗。患者在入院时、手术后和 12 个月的随访期间,均采用 Cobb 法对局部畸形角进行放射学评估。用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对患者的背痛进行临床评估:两组患者术前、术后即刻和术后 12 个月随访的 Cobb 角度平均值差异显著(P = 0.018)。术前和术后即刻Cobb角的平均差Δ1在A组明显大于B组(P = 0.038),这表明双水平固定患者术后即刻的Cobb角矫正效果更好。术后即刻和 12 个月随访 Cobb 角的平均差Δ2 在 A 组明显大于 B 组(p = 0.007),这表明双水平长固定患者的局部 Cobb 角矫正维持得更好。B组(单节段)和A组(双节段)术后即刻(P = 0.356)或12个月后(P = 0.147)的VAS值没有差异:结论:对于 A3 和 A4 胸腰椎交界处骨折,长节段固定比使用中间螺钉在骨折椎体上进行短节段固定更能矫正局部后凸 Cobb 角,并在 12 个月的随访中保持矫正效果。然而,放射学上的差异并不能预测临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信