Comparative analysis of imaging diagnostic models for tubular basophilia and mineralization of kidney.

IF 2.7 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Jong Su Byun, Ji Hyun Lee, Jin Seok Kang, Beom Seok Han
{"title":"Comparative analysis of imaging diagnostic models for tubular basophilia and mineralization of kidney.","authors":"Jong Su Byun,&nbsp;Ji Hyun Lee,&nbsp;Jin Seok Kang,&nbsp;Beom Seok Han","doi":"10.1186/s42826-022-00139-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Now that it is possible to efficiently classify and save tissue images of laboratory animals using whole-slide imaging, many diagnostic models are being developed through transfer learning with Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). In this study, transfer learning was performed to gain toxicopathological knowledge using CNN models such as InceptionV3 and Xception. For the classification of tubular basophilia and mineralization, two representative background lesions that commonly occur in toxicological studies, accuracies of diagnosis were compared using MobileNetV2, Xception and InceptionV3. For the simultaneous detection of the two lesions, the accuracy was analysed using You Only Look Once version 4 (YOLOv4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of the classification models was as follows: MobileNetV2 (epoch 50, accuracy: 98.57%) > Xception (epoch 70, accuracy: 97.47%) > InceptionV3 (epoch 70, accuracy: 89.62%). In the case of object detection, the accuracy of YOLOv4 was 98.62% at epoch 3000.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the classification models, MobileNetV2 had the best accuracy despite applying a lower epoch than InceptionV3 and Xception. The object detection model, YOLOv4, accurately and simultaneously diagnosed tubular basophilia and mineralization, with an accuracy of 98.62% at epoch 3000.</p>","PeriodicalId":17993,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animal Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-022-00139-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Now that it is possible to efficiently classify and save tissue images of laboratory animals using whole-slide imaging, many diagnostic models are being developed through transfer learning with Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). In this study, transfer learning was performed to gain toxicopathological knowledge using CNN models such as InceptionV3 and Xception. For the classification of tubular basophilia and mineralization, two representative background lesions that commonly occur in toxicological studies, accuracies of diagnosis were compared using MobileNetV2, Xception and InceptionV3. For the simultaneous detection of the two lesions, the accuracy was analysed using You Only Look Once version 4 (YOLOv4).

Results: The accuracy of the classification models was as follows: MobileNetV2 (epoch 50, accuracy: 98.57%) > Xception (epoch 70, accuracy: 97.47%) > InceptionV3 (epoch 70, accuracy: 89.62%). In the case of object detection, the accuracy of YOLOv4 was 98.62% at epoch 3000.

Conclusions: Among the classification models, MobileNetV2 had the best accuracy despite applying a lower epoch than InceptionV3 and Xception. The object detection model, YOLOv4, accurately and simultaneously diagnosed tubular basophilia and mineralization, with an accuracy of 98.62% at epoch 3000.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肾小管嗜碱性粒细胞增多与肾矿化的影像学诊断模型比较分析。
背景:现在,使用全切片成像技术可以有效地分类和保存实验动物的组织图像,许多诊断模型正在通过卷积神经网络(CNN)的迁移学习来开发。在本研究中,使用CNN模型(如InceptionV3和Xception)进行迁移学习以获得毒物病理学知识。对于毒理学研究中常见的两种具有代表性的背景病变小管嗜碱性粒细胞和矿化的分类,使用MobileNetV2、Xception和InceptionV3对诊断的准确性进行了比较。对于同时检测两个病变,使用You Only Look Once version 4 (YOLOv4)分析准确性。结果:分类模型的准确率为:MobileNetV2 (epoch 50,准确率98.57%)> Xception (epoch 70,准确率97.47%)> InceptionV3 (epoch 70,准确率89.62%)。在目标检测的情况下,YOLOv4在epoch 3000时的准确率为98.62%。结论:在分类模型中,MobileNetV2的准确率最高,尽管使用的历元较低,但仍优于InceptionV3和Xception。目标检测模型YOLOv4能够同时准确地诊断出管状嗜碱性和矿化,在3000 epoch的准确率为98.62%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信