Breast Milk and Saliva for Postnatal Cyto†megalovirus Screening among Very Low Birth Weight Infants.

Sagori Mukhopadhyay, Hannah L Itell, Erica Hartman, Emily Woodford, Miren B Dhudasia, Justin T Steppe, Sarah Valencia, Hunter Roark, Kelly C Wade, Kristin E D Weimer, Sallie R Permar, Karen M Puopolo
{"title":"Breast Milk and Saliva for Postnatal Cyto†megalovirus Screening among Very Low Birth Weight Infants.","authors":"Sagori Mukhopadhyay,&nbsp;Hannah L Itell,&nbsp;Erica Hartman,&nbsp;Emily Woodford,&nbsp;Miren B Dhudasia,&nbsp;Justin T Steppe,&nbsp;Sarah Valencia,&nbsp;Hunter Roark,&nbsp;Kelly C Wade,&nbsp;Kristin E D Weimer,&nbsp;Sallie R Permar,&nbsp;Karen M Puopolo","doi":"10.1097/INF.0000000000003671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal approach to managing postnatal cytomegalovirus disease (pCMV) among very low birth weight (VLBW) infants remains unknown. Methods to facilitate screening are needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine whether mother's milk and infant saliva can be used to reliably identify maternal cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus and detect infant pCMV acquisition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, prospective cohort study of VLBW infants, and their mothers, born between 2017 and 2020. Maternal milk samples were tested for CMV immunoglobulin G (IgG) using a CMV glycoprotein B binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the results were compared with maternal serum CMV IgG results. Biweekly paired saliva and urine samples were collected from infants born to mothers with positive or unknown CMV serostatus. Saliva samples were tested for CMV DNA by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and compared with urine CMV qualitative PCR results obtained from a clinical laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 108 infants without congenital CMV included in the study, 10 (9%) acquired pCMV. Both milk and blood CMV serology results were available for 70 mothers. Maternal milk antibody testing had a sensitivity of 97.2% (95% CI: 85.5-99.9%) and specificity of 91.2% (95% CI: 76.3-98.1%) in establishing CMV serostatus. Paired serially collected saliva and urine samples (n = 203) were available for 66 infants. Saliva PCR had a sensitivity of 30.0% (95% CI: 6.7-65.2%) and specificity of 92.7% (95% CI: 88.1-96.0%) in detecting pCMV acquisition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Maternal breast milk is a reliable alternative sample to determine CMV serostatus. Serial testing of infant saliva was not adequately sensitive for identifying pCMV acquisition in preterm infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":118937,"journal":{"name":"The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","volume":" ","pages":"904-910"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000003671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal approach to managing postnatal cytomegalovirus disease (pCMV) among very low birth weight (VLBW) infants remains unknown. Methods to facilitate screening are needed.

Objective: Determine whether mother's milk and infant saliva can be used to reliably identify maternal cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus and detect infant pCMV acquisition.

Methods: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study of VLBW infants, and their mothers, born between 2017 and 2020. Maternal milk samples were tested for CMV immunoglobulin G (IgG) using a CMV glycoprotein B binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the results were compared with maternal serum CMV IgG results. Biweekly paired saliva and urine samples were collected from infants born to mothers with positive or unknown CMV serostatus. Saliva samples were tested for CMV DNA by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and compared with urine CMV qualitative PCR results obtained from a clinical laboratory.

Results: Among 108 infants without congenital CMV included in the study, 10 (9%) acquired pCMV. Both milk and blood CMV serology results were available for 70 mothers. Maternal milk antibody testing had a sensitivity of 97.2% (95% CI: 85.5-99.9%) and specificity of 91.2% (95% CI: 76.3-98.1%) in establishing CMV serostatus. Paired serially collected saliva and urine samples (n = 203) were available for 66 infants. Saliva PCR had a sensitivity of 30.0% (95% CI: 6.7-65.2%) and specificity of 92.7% (95% CI: 88.1-96.0%) in detecting pCMV acquisition.

Conclusions: Maternal breast milk is a reliable alternative sample to determine CMV serostatus. Serial testing of infant saliva was not adequately sensitive for identifying pCMV acquisition in preterm infants.

母乳和唾液对极低出生体重儿产后巨细胞病毒筛查的影响
背景:极低出生体重(VLBW)婴儿出生后巨细胞病毒病(pCMV)的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。需要便于筛查的方法。目的:探讨母乳和婴儿唾液是否能够可靠地检测母体巨细胞病毒(CMV)血清状态和检测婴儿巨细胞病毒感染。方法:这是一项针对2017年至2020年间出生的VLBW婴儿及其母亲的单中心前瞻性队列研究。采用巨细胞病毒糖蛋白B结合酶联免疫吸附法检测乳汁中巨细胞病毒免疫球蛋白G (IgG),并与母体血清巨细胞病毒免疫球蛋白G (IgG)检测结果进行比较。从CMV阳性或未知母亲所生的婴儿每两周收集成对的唾液和尿液样本。采用实时定量聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测唾液样本的巨细胞病毒DNA,并与临床实验室尿液巨细胞病毒定性PCR结果进行比较。结果:在108名没有先天性巨细胞病毒的婴儿中,10名(9%)获得了pCMV。70名母亲的乳汁和血液巨细胞病毒血清学结果均可获得。母乳抗体检测检测CMV血清状态的敏感性为97.2% (95% CI: 85.5-99.9%),特异性为91.2% (95% CI: 76.3-98.1%)。对66名婴儿进行配对的唾液和尿液样本(n = 203)。唾液PCR检测pCMV获取的敏感性为30.0% (95% CI: 6.7 ~ 65.2%),特异性为92.7% (95% CI: 88.1 ~ 96.0%)。结论:母乳是检测巨细胞病毒血清状态的可靠替代样本。婴儿唾液系列检测对早产儿pCMV获取的识别不够敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信