Pollen DNA metabarcoding reveals cryptic diversity and high spatial turnover in alpine plant–pollinator networks

IF 4.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Francisco Encinas-Viso, Jessica Bovill, David E. Albrecht, Jaime Florez-Fernandez, Bryan Lessard, James Lumbers, Juanita Rodriguez, Alexander Schmidt-Lebuhn, Andreas Zwick, Liz Milla
{"title":"Pollen DNA metabarcoding reveals cryptic diversity and high spatial turnover in alpine plant–pollinator networks","authors":"Francisco Encinas-Viso,&nbsp;Jessica Bovill,&nbsp;David E. Albrecht,&nbsp;Jaime Florez-Fernandez,&nbsp;Bryan Lessard,&nbsp;James Lumbers,&nbsp;Juanita Rodriguez,&nbsp;Alexander Schmidt-Lebuhn,&nbsp;Andreas Zwick,&nbsp;Liz Milla","doi":"10.1111/mec.16682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Alpine plant–pollinator communities play an important role in the functioning of alpine ecosystems, which are highly threatened by climate change. However, we still have a poor understanding of how environmental factors and spatiotemporal variability shape these communities. Here, we investigate what drives structure and beta diversity in a plant–pollinator metacommunity from the Australian alpine region using two approaches: pollen DNA metabarcoding (MB) and observations. Individual pollinators often carry pollen from multiple plant species, and therefore we expected MB to reveal a more diverse and complex network structure. We used two gene regions (ITS2 and <i>trnL</i>) to identify plant species present in the pollen loads of 154 insect pollinator specimens from three alpine habitats and construct MB networks, and compared them to networks based on observations alone. We compared species and interaction turnover across space for both types of networks, and evaluated their differences for plant phylogenetic diversity and beta diversity. We found significant structural differences between the two types of networks; notably, MB networks were much less specialized but more diverse than observation networks, with MB detecting many cryptic plant species. Both approaches revealed that alpine pollination networks are very generalized, but we estimated a high spatial turnover of plant species (0.79) and interaction rewiring (0.6) as well as high plant phylogenetic diversity (0.68) driven by habitat differences based on the larger diversity of plant species and species interactions detected with MB. Overall, our findings show that habitat and microclimatic heterogeneity drives diversity and fine-scale spatial turnover of alpine plant–pollinator networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":210,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mec.16682","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Alpine plant–pollinator communities play an important role in the functioning of alpine ecosystems, which are highly threatened by climate change. However, we still have a poor understanding of how environmental factors and spatiotemporal variability shape these communities. Here, we investigate what drives structure and beta diversity in a plant–pollinator metacommunity from the Australian alpine region using two approaches: pollen DNA metabarcoding (MB) and observations. Individual pollinators often carry pollen from multiple plant species, and therefore we expected MB to reveal a more diverse and complex network structure. We used two gene regions (ITS2 and trnL) to identify plant species present in the pollen loads of 154 insect pollinator specimens from three alpine habitats and construct MB networks, and compared them to networks based on observations alone. We compared species and interaction turnover across space for both types of networks, and evaluated their differences for plant phylogenetic diversity and beta diversity. We found significant structural differences between the two types of networks; notably, MB networks were much less specialized but more diverse than observation networks, with MB detecting many cryptic plant species. Both approaches revealed that alpine pollination networks are very generalized, but we estimated a high spatial turnover of plant species (0.79) and interaction rewiring (0.6) as well as high plant phylogenetic diversity (0.68) driven by habitat differences based on the larger diversity of plant species and species interactions detected with MB. Overall, our findings show that habitat and microclimatic heterogeneity drives diversity and fine-scale spatial turnover of alpine plant–pollinator networks.

花粉DNA元条形码揭示了高山植物传粉者网络的隐性多样性和高空间周转。
高寒植物传粉者群落在高寒生态系统的功能中起着重要作用,高寒生态系统受到气候变化的严重威胁。然而,我们对环境因素和时空变化如何塑造这些群落的理解仍然很差。本文采用花粉DNA元条形码(MB)和观测两种方法研究了澳大利亚高寒地区植物-传粉者元群落结构和β多样性的驱动因素。单个传粉者通常携带来自多个植物物种的花粉,因此我们期望MB显示出更多样化和复杂的网络结构。利用ITS2和trnL两个基因区,对来自3个高山生境的154份昆虫传粉媒介花粉中存在的植物种类进行了鉴定,构建了MB网络,并与单纯观测的网络进行了比较。我们比较了两种网络的物种和相互作用在空间上的更替,并评估了它们在植物系统发育多样性和β多样性方面的差异。我们发现两种类型的网络之间存在显著的结构差异;值得注意的是,MB网络的专门化程度较低,但比观测网络更多样化,可以探测到许多隐种植物。两种方法都揭示了高山传粉网络的广泛性,但基于植物物种多样性和物种相互作用,我们估计了由生境差异驱动的高植物物种空间更替(0.79)和互作重连线(0.6),以及高植物系统发育多样性(0.68)。研究结果表明,生境和小气候异质性驱动了高山植物-传粉媒介网络的多样性和精细尺度空间转换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Ecology
Molecular Ecology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.20%
发文量
472
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Ecology publishes papers that utilize molecular genetic techniques to address consequential questions in ecology, evolution, behaviour and conservation. Studies may employ neutral markers for inference about ecological and evolutionary processes or examine ecologically important genes and their products directly. We discourage papers that are primarily descriptive and are relevant only to the taxon being studied. Papers reporting on molecular marker development, molecular diagnostics, barcoding, or DNA taxonomy, or technical methods should be re-directed to our sister journal, Molecular Ecology Resources. Likewise, papers with a strongly applied focus should be submitted to Evolutionary Applications. Research areas of interest to Molecular Ecology include: * population structure and phylogeography * reproductive strategies * relatedness and kin selection * sex allocation * population genetic theory * analytical methods development * conservation genetics * speciation genetics * microbial biodiversity * evolutionary dynamics of QTLs * ecological interactions * molecular adaptation and environmental genomics * impact of genetically modified organisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信