{"title":"Technology and French Thought: a Dialogue Between Jean-Luc Nancy and François-David Sebbah.","authors":"François-David Sebbah, Jean-Luc Nancy","doi":"10.1007/s13347-022-00579-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper is not an article in a regular sense. It is a dialogue between François-David Sebbah, one of the two editors of this topical collection, and Jean-Luc Nancy, one of the most eminent representatives of the contemporary French Thought. This dialogue took place in the first half of 2022 in a written form, because of the sanitary restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic and because Nancy was heavily sick. Sebbah sent to Nancy a text, corresponding to Section 2.1, and Nancy responded to it with another text, corresponding to Section 2.2. Unfortunately, Nancy died on August 23, 2022, and could not revise his own text nor pursue the dialogue, as it was originally planned. For this reason, an introductory clarification by Sebbah, corresponding to Section 1, has been added. The purpose of such clarification is to introduce the reader to Nancy's philosophy of technology-although technology never had a central role in Nancy's reflections. In Section 2.1, Sebbah proposes a distinction between \"French Theory,\" \"French Thought,\" and \"French Philosophy.\" He also proposes a list of twelve possible intersections between the French Thought and the philosophy of technology. In Section 2.2, Nancy criticizes the use of expressions such as \"French Thought.\" He also insists, in a Heideggerian vein, on the fact that Technology (with a capital \"T\") does not depend on human ends but has its own ends.</p>","PeriodicalId":513391,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Technology","volume":"35 3","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00579-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper is not an article in a regular sense. It is a dialogue between François-David Sebbah, one of the two editors of this topical collection, and Jean-Luc Nancy, one of the most eminent representatives of the contemporary French Thought. This dialogue took place in the first half of 2022 in a written form, because of the sanitary restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic and because Nancy was heavily sick. Sebbah sent to Nancy a text, corresponding to Section 2.1, and Nancy responded to it with another text, corresponding to Section 2.2. Unfortunately, Nancy died on August 23, 2022, and could not revise his own text nor pursue the dialogue, as it was originally planned. For this reason, an introductory clarification by Sebbah, corresponding to Section 1, has been added. The purpose of such clarification is to introduce the reader to Nancy's philosophy of technology-although technology never had a central role in Nancy's reflections. In Section 2.1, Sebbah proposes a distinction between "French Theory," "French Thought," and "French Philosophy." He also proposes a list of twelve possible intersections between the French Thought and the philosophy of technology. In Section 2.2, Nancy criticizes the use of expressions such as "French Thought." He also insists, in a Heideggerian vein, on the fact that Technology (with a capital "T") does not depend on human ends but has its own ends.
这篇文章不是一般意义上的文章。这是franois - david Sebbah和Jean-Luc Nancy(当代法国思想最杰出的代表之一)之间的对话。这次对话是在2022年上半年以书面形式进行的,因为与COVID-19大流行有关的卫生限制,而且南希病得很重。西巴给南希发了一条短信,对应第2.1节,南希回复了另一条短信,对应第2.2节。不幸的是,南希于2022年8月23日去世,无法修改自己的文本,也无法按照原计划进行对话。因此,在第1节中增加了Sebbah的介绍性澄清。这样澄清的目的是向读者介绍南希的技术哲学——尽管技术在南希的反思中从未扮演过中心角色。在2.1节中,Sebbah提出了“法国理论”、“法国思想”和“法国哲学”之间的区别。他还列出了法国思想和技术哲学之间的12个可能的交叉点。在第2.2节中,南希批评了“法国思想”等表达的使用。他还以海德格尔的风格坚持认为,技术(以大写“T”开头)不依赖于人类的目的,而是有自己的目的。