Development of the Mental Health Peer Support Questionnaire in colleges and vocational schools in Singapore.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
QianHui Ma, Joseph J Gallo, Jeanine M Parisi, Jin Hui Joo
{"title":"Development of the Mental Health Peer Support Questionnaire in colleges and vocational schools in Singapore.","authors":"QianHui Ma,&nbsp;Joseph J Gallo,&nbsp;Jeanine M Parisi,&nbsp;Jin Hui Joo","doi":"10.1186/s13033-022-00555-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A nation-wide mental health peer support initiative was established in college and vocational schools in Singapore. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to develop and validate a 20-item self-report instrument, the Mental Health Peer Support Questionnaire (MHPSQ), to assess young adults' perceived knowledge and skills in mental health peer support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered the questionnaire to 102 students who were trained as peer supporters, and 306 students who were not trained as peer supporters (denoted as non-peer supporters), in five college and vocational schools. Exploratory factor analysis and descriptive statistics were conducted. Cronbach's α was used to assess reliability, and independent sample t-tests to assess criterion validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis indicated a three-factor structure with adequate internal reliability (discerning stigma [α = .76], personal mastery [α = .77], skills in handling challenging interpersonal situations [α = .74]; overall scale [α = .74]). Consistent with establishing criterion validity, peer supporters rated themselves as significantly more knowledgeable and skilled than non-peer supporters on all items except two: (1) letting peer support recipients make their own mental health decisions, and (2) young adults' self-awareness of feeling overwhelmed. Peer supporters who had served the role for a longer period of time had significantly higher perceived awareness of stigma affecting mental health help-seeking. Peer supporters who had reached out to more peer support recipients reported significantly higher perceived skills in handling challenging interpersonal situations, particularly in encouraging professional help-seeking and identifying warning signs of suicide.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MHPSQ may be a useful tool for obtaining a baseline assessment of young adults' perceived knowledge and skills in mental health peer support, prior to them being trained as peer supporters. This could facilitate tailoring of training programs based on young adults' initial understanding of mental health peer support. Subsequent to young adults' training and application of skills, the MHPSQ could also be applied to evaluate the effectiveness of peer programs and mental health training.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438123/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-022-00555-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: A nation-wide mental health peer support initiative was established in college and vocational schools in Singapore. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to develop and validate a 20-item self-report instrument, the Mental Health Peer Support Questionnaire (MHPSQ), to assess young adults' perceived knowledge and skills in mental health peer support.

Methods: We administered the questionnaire to 102 students who were trained as peer supporters, and 306 students who were not trained as peer supporters (denoted as non-peer supporters), in five college and vocational schools. Exploratory factor analysis and descriptive statistics were conducted. Cronbach's α was used to assess reliability, and independent sample t-tests to assess criterion validity.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis indicated a three-factor structure with adequate internal reliability (discerning stigma [α = .76], personal mastery [α = .77], skills in handling challenging interpersonal situations [α = .74]; overall scale [α = .74]). Consistent with establishing criterion validity, peer supporters rated themselves as significantly more knowledgeable and skilled than non-peer supporters on all items except two: (1) letting peer support recipients make their own mental health decisions, and (2) young adults' self-awareness of feeling overwhelmed. Peer supporters who had served the role for a longer period of time had significantly higher perceived awareness of stigma affecting mental health help-seeking. Peer supporters who had reached out to more peer support recipients reported significantly higher perceived skills in handling challenging interpersonal situations, particularly in encouraging professional help-seeking and identifying warning signs of suicide.

Conclusions: The MHPSQ may be a useful tool for obtaining a baseline assessment of young adults' perceived knowledge and skills in mental health peer support, prior to them being trained as peer supporters. This could facilitate tailoring of training programs based on young adults' initial understanding of mental health peer support. Subsequent to young adults' training and application of skills, the MHPSQ could also be applied to evaluate the effectiveness of peer programs and mental health training.

新加坡大学和职业学校心理健康同伴支持问卷的编制。
背景:在新加坡的大学和职业学校建立了一项全国性的心理健康同伴支持倡议。本横断面研究的目的是开发和验证一个20个项目的自我报告工具——心理健康同伴支持问卷(MHPSQ),以评估年轻人在心理健康同伴支持方面的感知知识和技能。方法:采用问卷调查的方法,对来自5所大学和职业学校的102名接受同伴支持训练的学生和306名未接受同伴支持训练的学生(记为非同伴支持)进行问卷调查。进行探索性因素分析和描述性统计。采用Cronbach’s α评价信度,采用独立样本t检验评价标准效度。结果:探索性因子分析显示三因子结构具有足够的内部信度(辨别柱头)[α =。[76],个人掌握[α =。77]处理具有挑战性的人际关系的能力[α = .74];总量表[α = .74])。与标准效度的建立一致,同伴支持者认为自己在所有项目上都比非同伴支持者更有知识和技能,除了两个项目:(1)让同伴支持接受者自己做出心理健康决定,以及(2)年轻人感到不知所措的自我意识。担任该角色较长时间的同伴支持者对影响心理健康求助的耻辱感的感知意识明显较高。与更多的同伴支持接受者接触的同伴支持者报告说,他们在处理具有挑战性的人际关系方面的感知技能显著提高,特别是在鼓励专业求助和识别自杀警告信号方面。结论:在年轻人接受同伴支持培训之前,MHPSQ可能是一个有用的工具,可以获得他们在心理健康同伴支持方面的认知知识和技能的基线评估。这可能有助于根据年轻人对心理健康同伴支持的初步理解来定制培训计划。在年轻人的培训和技能应用之后,MHPSQ也可以用于评估同伴项目和心理健康培训的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信