{"title":"Leukocyte Esterase and Nitrite Urine Reagent Strip Utility Under Altered Assay Conditions in Dogs.","authors":"Justin Farris, Melinda S Camus, Paula M Krimer","doi":"10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study evaluated leukocyte esterase (LE) and nitrite reagent pad usefulness in canine urine using multiple time endpoints and decision thresholds. Whole and sedimented urine samples from 116 client-owned dogs were analyzed with reagent strips from four manufacturers. Results for LE and nitrite were recorded every 30 s up to 150 s using \"trace\" and \"+\" positive thresholds and compared to microscopic urine sediment analysis and culture results. Sedimented urine assessed at 150 s with a \"trace\" positive threshold for LE had significantly or trending higher sensitivity (brand dependent) for pyuria detection compared with manufacturer recommendations. Using these parameters, LE sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio were 66.67-89.47%, and 0.13-0.37, respectively. Following manufacturer recommendations, LE specificity and positive likelihood ratio were 96.91-100% and 17.02-30.63, respectively. Nitrite performance for pyuria and bacteriuria detection was poor for all conditions. LE reagent pads are a useful screening test for pyuria detection using sedimented urine and a \"trace\" positive threshold at 150 s, whereas LE use with traditional manufacturer recommendations is a good confirmatory test for pyuria detection. Nitrite reagent pads are not useful for pyuria or bacteriuria detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association","volume":"58 5","pages":"240-248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7233","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The study evaluated leukocyte esterase (LE) and nitrite reagent pad usefulness in canine urine using multiple time endpoints and decision thresholds. Whole and sedimented urine samples from 116 client-owned dogs were analyzed with reagent strips from four manufacturers. Results for LE and nitrite were recorded every 30 s up to 150 s using "trace" and "+" positive thresholds and compared to microscopic urine sediment analysis and culture results. Sedimented urine assessed at 150 s with a "trace" positive threshold for LE had significantly or trending higher sensitivity (brand dependent) for pyuria detection compared with manufacturer recommendations. Using these parameters, LE sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio were 66.67-89.47%, and 0.13-0.37, respectively. Following manufacturer recommendations, LE specificity and positive likelihood ratio were 96.91-100% and 17.02-30.63, respectively. Nitrite performance for pyuria and bacteriuria detection was poor for all conditions. LE reagent pads are a useful screening test for pyuria detection using sedimented urine and a "trace" positive threshold at 150 s, whereas LE use with traditional manufacturer recommendations is a good confirmatory test for pyuria detection. Nitrite reagent pads are not useful for pyuria or bacteriuria detection.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the JAAHA is to publish relevant, original, timely scientific and technical information pertaining to the practice of small animal medicine and surgery.