Validity and reliability of the persian version of the world health organization quality of life disabilities module.

IF 1.5 4区医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1177/17446295221123867

Nasibe Sorkhi, Isa Akbarzade, Saharnaz Nedjat, Mohammad Khosravi, Maryam Nazemipour, Amir-Hossein Memari, Mohammad Ali Mansournia

{"title":"Validity and reliability of the persian version of the world health organization quality of life disabilities module.","authors":"Nasibe Sorkhi, Isa Akbarzade, Saharnaz Nedjat, Mohammad Khosravi, Maryam Nazemipour, Amir-Hossein Memari, Mohammad Ali Mansournia","doi":"10.1177/17446295221123867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the world health organization quality of life questionnaire for people with intellectual disability (WHOQOL-DIS-ID). This was a cross-sectional study of 118 adults with intellectual disability. Internal consistency and temporal reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Construct validity of the structure was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with the quality of life. Cronbach's alpha for all, but not for discrimination area, as well as ICC for all questions except for 23 and 6, were higher than 0.7. The variables such as periodic check-up, number of friends, entertainment outside the home, parental separation, physical activity, unmet needs score, caregiver's mental health status, and available facilities were the predictors of QOL. The Persian version of the WHOQOL-DIS-ID shows acceptable validity and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295221123867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the world health organization quality of life questionnaire for people with intellectual disability (WHOQOL-DIS-ID). This was a cross-sectional study of 118 adults with intellectual disability. Internal consistency and temporal reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Construct validity of the structure was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with the quality of life. Cronbach's alpha for all, but not for discrimination area, as well as ICC for all questions except for 23 and 6, were higher than 0.7. The variables such as periodic check-up, number of friends, entertainment outside the home, parental separation, physical activity, unmet needs score, caregiver's mental health status, and available facilities were the predictors of QOL. The Persian version of the WHOQOL-DIS-ID shows acceptable validity and reliability.

查看原文本刊更多论文

世界卫生组织生活质量残疾模块波斯语版本的有效性和可靠性。

本研究旨在评估世界卫生组织智障人士生活质量问卷（WHOQOL-DIS-ID）的有效性和可靠性。这是一项对 118 名成年智障人士进行的横断面研究。内部一致性和时间可靠性分别采用克朗巴赫α和类内相关系数（ICC）进行评估。采用确证因子分析评估了结构的构效性。为确定与生活质量相关的因素，进行了多元线性回归分析。除第 23 题和第 6 题外，所有问题的 Cronbach's alpha 均高于 0.7，但歧视领域的 Cronbach's alpha 和 ICC 均低于 0.7。定期体检、朋友数量、家庭外娱乐、父母分居、体育活动、未满足需求得分、照顾者的心理健康状况和可用设施等变量是预测生活质量的因素。波斯语版的 WHOQOL-DIS-ID 显示出了可接受的有效性和可靠性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Multiple-

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

13.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The principal aim of the journal is to provide a medium for the exchange of best practice, knowledge and research between academic and professional disciplines from education, social and health settings to bring about advancement of services for people with intellectual disabilities. The idea of a practice-led journal is both exciting and timely. This journal serves as a medium for all those involved with people with intellectual disabilities to submit and publish papers on issues relevant to promoting services for people with intellectual disabilities.