Endovascular treatment of acute M1 occlusions due to underlying intracranial atherosclerotic severe stenosis.

Q2 Medicine
Yazhou Yan, Li Du, Xiliang He, Qinghai Huang, Yuan Pan, Tao Xin
{"title":"Endovascular treatment of acute M1 occlusions due to underlying intracranial atherosclerotic severe stenosis.","authors":"Yazhou Yan,&nbsp;Li Du,&nbsp;Xiliang He,&nbsp;Qinghai Huang,&nbsp;Yuan Pan,&nbsp;Tao Xin","doi":"10.1186/s41016-022-00292-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke with an occlusion of the M1 segment due to intracranial atherosclerotic severe stenosis (ICASS) remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EVT for ICASS-related M1 acute occlusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed all patients with an ICASS-related M1 acute occlusion who underwent EVT at our institution between January 2015 and December 2020. Clinical presentation, baseline characteristics, angiographic and clinical results, technical feasibility, perioperative complications, and follow-up results were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients with ICASS-related M1 acute occlusion were included. Eight patients (36.4%) received bridging therapy, and the other 14 patients (63.6%) directly underwent EVT. Fifteen patients (68.2%) treated with balloon dilations and stenting as rescue treatment. Six patients (27.3%) received single balloon angioplasty, and 5 of these patients were treated with staged stenting. One case (4.5%) failed recanalization at the first EVT, and successful revascularization was achieved a month later. The mean procedure time was 67.2 ± 20.8 min. Successful revascularization (mTICI ≥ 2b) was achieved in 95.5% (21/22) of patients. Perioperative complications developed in two patients (9.1%) including one hemorrhagic event and one thromboembolic event. Angiographic follow-up was available in 20 patients (90.9%) at an average of 8.6 ± 3.0 months. The degree of stenosis was worse (10-30%) in 6 cases (30%) compared with the initial outcomes. The favorable outcomes (mRS ≤ 2) at 3-month follow-up was achieved in 19 patients (86.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICASS-related occlusion in the M1 segment often required a rescue therapy including balloon angioplasty with/without stenting, and this treatment strategy was safe and effective. But single balloon angioplasty at the first EVT generally cannot achieve satisfactory results and often needed staged stenting treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":36700,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Neurosurgical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9434881/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Neurosurgical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-022-00292-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke with an occlusion of the M1 segment due to intracranial atherosclerotic severe stenosis (ICASS) remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EVT for ICASS-related M1 acute occlusion.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with an ICASS-related M1 acute occlusion who underwent EVT at our institution between January 2015 and December 2020. Clinical presentation, baseline characteristics, angiographic and clinical results, technical feasibility, perioperative complications, and follow-up results were evaluated.

Results: Twenty-two patients with ICASS-related M1 acute occlusion were included. Eight patients (36.4%) received bridging therapy, and the other 14 patients (63.6%) directly underwent EVT. Fifteen patients (68.2%) treated with balloon dilations and stenting as rescue treatment. Six patients (27.3%) received single balloon angioplasty, and 5 of these patients were treated with staged stenting. One case (4.5%) failed recanalization at the first EVT, and successful revascularization was achieved a month later. The mean procedure time was 67.2 ± 20.8 min. Successful revascularization (mTICI ≥ 2b) was achieved in 95.5% (21/22) of patients. Perioperative complications developed in two patients (9.1%) including one hemorrhagic event and one thromboembolic event. Angiographic follow-up was available in 20 patients (90.9%) at an average of 8.6 ± 3.0 months. The degree of stenosis was worse (10-30%) in 6 cases (30%) compared with the initial outcomes. The favorable outcomes (mRS ≤ 2) at 3-month follow-up was achieved in 19 patients (86.4%).

Conclusions: ICASS-related occlusion in the M1 segment often required a rescue therapy including balloon angioplasty with/without stenting, and this treatment strategy was safe and effective. But single balloon angioplasty at the first EVT generally cannot achieve satisfactory results and often needed staged stenting treatment.

Abstract Image

颅内粥样硬化性严重狭窄所致急性M1闭塞的血管内治疗。
背景:颅内动脉粥样硬化性严重狭窄(ICASS)导致的急性缺血性卒中M1段闭塞的血管内治疗(EVT)仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在评价EVT治疗icass相关M1急性闭塞的安全性和有效性。方法:我们回顾性分析了2015年1月至2020年12月在我院接受EVT治疗的所有icass相关M1急性闭塞患者。评估临床表现、基线特征、血管造影和临床结果、技术可行性、围手术期并发症和随访结果。结果:纳入22例icass相关M1急性闭塞患者。8例(36.4%)患者接受了桥接治疗,14例(63.6%)患者直接行EVT。15例(68.2%)患者行球囊扩张支架置入术作为抢救治疗。6例患者(27.3%)接受了单球囊血管成形术,其中5例患者接受了分期支架置入术。1例(4.5%)首次EVT再通失败,1个月后再通成功。平均手术时间为67.2±20.8 min。95.5%(21/22)患者血运重建成功(mTICI≥2b)。2例患者(9.1%)出现围手术期并发症,包括1例出血事件和1例血栓栓塞事件。血管造影随访20例(90.9%),平均8.6±3.0个月。6例(30%)狭窄程度较初始结果加重(10-30%)。随访3个月,19例(86.4%)患者的预后良好(mRS≤2)。结论:M1段icass相关闭塞常需要球囊成形术加/不加支架的抢救治疗,该治疗策略安全有效。但首次EVT单球囊成形术一般不能达到满意的效果,往往需要分阶段支架治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
224
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信