Multicancer Early Detection Technologies: A Review Informed by Past Cancer Screening Studies.

Sana Raoof, Richard J Lee, Kunal Jajoo, Joseph D Mancias, Timothy R Rebbeck, Steven J Skates
{"title":"Multicancer Early Detection Technologies: A Review Informed by Past Cancer Screening Studies.","authors":"Sana Raoof,&nbsp;Richard J Lee,&nbsp;Kunal Jajoo,&nbsp;Joseph D Mancias,&nbsp;Timothy R Rebbeck,&nbsp;Steven J Skates","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More than 75% of cancer-related deaths occur from cancers for which we do not screen. New screening liquid biopsies may help fill these clinical gaps, although evidence of benefit still needs to be assessed. Which lessons can we learn from previous efforts to guide those of the future? Screening trials for ovarian, prostate, pancreatic, and esophageal cancers are revisited to assess the evidence, which has been limited by small effect sizes, short duration of early-stage disease relative to screening frequency, study design, and confounding factors. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) to show mortality reduction have required millions of screening-years, two-decade durations, and been susceptible to external confounding. Future RCTs with late-stage incidence as a surrogate endpoint could substantially reduce these challenges, and clinical studies demonstrating safety and effectiveness of screening in high-risk populations may enable extrapolation to broader average-risk populations. Multicancer early detection tests provide an opportunity to advance these practical study designs. Conditional approvals based on RCTs with surrogate endpoints, contingent upon real world evidence generation and continuation of trials to definitive endpoints, may lower practical barriers to innovation in cancer screening and enable greater progress.</p>","PeriodicalId":520580,"journal":{"name":"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1139-1145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

More than 75% of cancer-related deaths occur from cancers for which we do not screen. New screening liquid biopsies may help fill these clinical gaps, although evidence of benefit still needs to be assessed. Which lessons can we learn from previous efforts to guide those of the future? Screening trials for ovarian, prostate, pancreatic, and esophageal cancers are revisited to assess the evidence, which has been limited by small effect sizes, short duration of early-stage disease relative to screening frequency, study design, and confounding factors. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) to show mortality reduction have required millions of screening-years, two-decade durations, and been susceptible to external confounding. Future RCTs with late-stage incidence as a surrogate endpoint could substantially reduce these challenges, and clinical studies demonstrating safety and effectiveness of screening in high-risk populations may enable extrapolation to broader average-risk populations. Multicancer early detection tests provide an opportunity to advance these practical study designs. Conditional approvals based on RCTs with surrogate endpoints, contingent upon real world evidence generation and continuation of trials to definitive endpoints, may lower practical barriers to innovation in cancer screening and enable greater progress.

多癌早期检测技术:回顾过去的癌症筛查研究。
超过75%的癌症相关死亡发生在我们没有筛查的癌症上。新的筛选液体活检可能有助于填补这些临床空白,尽管益处的证据仍需要评估。我们可以从以前的努力中吸取哪些教训来指导未来的努力?卵巢癌、前列腺癌、胰腺癌和食管癌的筛查试验被重新审视以评估证据,这些证据受到较小的效应量、相对于筛查频率、研究设计和混杂因素的早期疾病持续时间短的限制。显示死亡率降低的随机对照试验(RCT)需要数百万筛查年,持续时间为20年,并且容易受到外部干扰。未来以晚期发病率为替代终点的随机对照试验可以大大减少这些挑战,临床研究表明,在高风险人群中筛查的安全性和有效性可能会使外推到更广泛的平均风险人群。多癌早期检测测试为推进这些实用的研究设计提供了机会。基于替代终点的随机对照试验的有条件批准,取决于真实世界的证据生成和试验的持续,以确定终点,可能会降低癌症筛查创新的实际障碍,并实现更大的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信