The temporal context in bayesian models of interval timing: Recent advances and future directions.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioral neuroscience Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-23 DOI:10.1037/bne0000513
Renata Sadibolova, Devin B Terhune
{"title":"The temporal context in bayesian models of interval timing: Recent advances and future directions.","authors":"Renata Sadibolova, Devin B Terhune","doi":"10.1037/bne0000513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sensory perception, motor control, and cognition necessitate reliable timing in the range of milliseconds to seconds, which implies the existence of a highly accurate timing system. Yet, partly owing to the fact that temporal processing is modulated by contextual factors, perceived time is not isomorphic to physical time. Temporal estimates exhibit regression to the mean of an interval distribution (<i>global context</i>) and are also affected by preceding trials (<i>local context</i>). Recent Bayesian models of interval timing have provided important insights regarding these observations, but questions remain as to how exposure to past intervals shapes perceived time. In this article, we provide a brief overview of Bayesian models of interval timing and their contribution to current understanding of context effects. We then proceed to highlight recent developments in the field concerning precision weighting of Bayesian evidence in both healthy timing and disease and the neurophysiological and neurochemical signatures of timing prediction errors. We further aim to bring attention to current outstanding questions for Bayesian models of interval timing, such as the likelihood conceptualization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":8739,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sensory perception, motor control, and cognition necessitate reliable timing in the range of milliseconds to seconds, which implies the existence of a highly accurate timing system. Yet, partly owing to the fact that temporal processing is modulated by contextual factors, perceived time is not isomorphic to physical time. Temporal estimates exhibit regression to the mean of an interval distribution (global context) and are also affected by preceding trials (local context). Recent Bayesian models of interval timing have provided important insights regarding these observations, but questions remain as to how exposure to past intervals shapes perceived time. In this article, we provide a brief overview of Bayesian models of interval timing and their contribution to current understanding of context effects. We then proceed to highlight recent developments in the field concerning precision weighting of Bayesian evidence in both healthy timing and disease and the neurophysiological and neurochemical signatures of timing prediction errors. We further aim to bring attention to current outstanding questions for Bayesian models of interval timing, such as the likelihood conceptualization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Abstract Image

贝叶斯时间间隔模型中的时间背景:最新进展与未来方向。
感官感知、运动控制和认知都需要毫秒到秒之间的可靠计时,这意味着存在一个高度精确的计时系统。然而,部分由于时间处理受环境因素的影响,感知时间与物理时间并不等同。时间估计值会向间隔分布的平均值回归(全局背景),同时也会受到之前试验的影响(局部背景)。最近的时间间隔贝叶斯模型对这些观察结果提供了重要的启示,但对于过去的时间间隔是如何影响感知时间的问题仍然存在。在本文中,我们将简要概述贝叶斯区间计时模型及其对当前理解情境效应的贡献。然后,我们将着重介绍该领域的最新进展,包括健康计时和疾病中贝叶斯证据的精确加权,以及计时预测错误的神经生理学和神经化学特征。我们还将进一步关注贝叶斯时间间隔模型目前存在的悬而未决的问题,如可能性概念化。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral neuroscience
Behavioral neuroscience 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioral Neuroscience publishes original research articles as well as reviews in the broad field of the neural bases of behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信