Development of a job stressor scale for nurses caring for patients with intractable neurological diseases.

Q4 Medicine
Yukako Ando, Tsuyoshi Kataoka, Hitoshi Okamura, Katsutoshi Tanaka, Toshio Kobayashi
{"title":"Development of a job stressor scale for nurses caring for patients with intractable neurological diseases.","authors":"Yukako Ando,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Kataoka,&nbsp;Hitoshi Okamura,&nbsp;Katsutoshi Tanaka,&nbsp;Toshio Kobayashi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this research is to verify the reliability and validity of a job stressor scale for nurses caring for patients with intractable neurological diseases. A mail survey was conducted using a self-report questionnaire. The subjects were 263 nurses and assistant nurses working in wards specializing in intractable neurological diseases. The response rate was 71.9% (valid response rate, 66.2%). With regard to reliability, internal consistency and stability were assessed. Internal consistency was examined via Cronbach's alpha. For stability, the test-retest method was performed and stability was examined via intraclass correlation coefficients. With regard to validity, factor validity, criterion-related validity, and content validity were assessed. Exploratory factor analysis was used for factor validity. For criterion-related validity, an existing scale was used as an external criterion; concurrent validity was examined via Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. As a result of analysis, there were 26 items in the scale created with an eight factor structure. Cronbach's a for the 26 items was 0.90; with the exception of two factors, alpha for all of the individual sub-factors was high at 0.7 or higher. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the 26 items was 0.89 (p < 0.001). With regard to criterion-related validity, concurrent validity was confirmed and the correlation coefficient with an external criterion was 0.73 (p < 0.001). For content validity, subjects who responded that \"The questionnaire represents a stressor well or to a degree\" accounted for 81% of the total responses. Reliability and validity were confirmed, so the scale created in the current research is a usable scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":12860,"journal":{"name":"Hiroshima journal of medical sciences","volume":"62 4","pages":"69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hiroshima journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to verify the reliability and validity of a job stressor scale for nurses caring for patients with intractable neurological diseases. A mail survey was conducted using a self-report questionnaire. The subjects were 263 nurses and assistant nurses working in wards specializing in intractable neurological diseases. The response rate was 71.9% (valid response rate, 66.2%). With regard to reliability, internal consistency and stability were assessed. Internal consistency was examined via Cronbach's alpha. For stability, the test-retest method was performed and stability was examined via intraclass correlation coefficients. With regard to validity, factor validity, criterion-related validity, and content validity were assessed. Exploratory factor analysis was used for factor validity. For criterion-related validity, an existing scale was used as an external criterion; concurrent validity was examined via Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. As a result of analysis, there were 26 items in the scale created with an eight factor structure. Cronbach's a for the 26 items was 0.90; with the exception of two factors, alpha for all of the individual sub-factors was high at 0.7 or higher. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the 26 items was 0.89 (p < 0.001). With regard to criterion-related validity, concurrent validity was confirmed and the correlation coefficient with an external criterion was 0.73 (p < 0.001). For content validity, subjects who responded that "The questionnaire represents a stressor well or to a degree" accounted for 81% of the total responses. Reliability and validity were confirmed, so the scale created in the current research is a usable scale.

难治性神经系统疾病护士工作压力源量表的编制。
本研究的目的是验证工作压力源量表用于护理难治性神经系统疾病患者的信度和效度。邮件调查采用自我报告问卷进行。研究对象为263名在顽固性神经疾病专科病房工作的护士和助理护士。有效率为71.9%(有效有效率为66.2%)。关于可靠性,内部一致性和稳定性进行了评估。内部一致性通过Cronbach’s alpha检验。稳定性采用重测法,通过类内相关系数检验稳定性。效度方面,评估因子效度、标准相关效度和内容效度。因子效度采用探索性因子分析。对于标准相关效度,使用现有量表作为外部标准;并发效度采用Spearman等级相关系数检验。经分析,量表共有26个项目,采用八因子结构。26个条目的Cronbach’s a为0.90;除两个因子外,所有个体子因子的alpha值都很高,为0.7或更高。26项的类内相关系数为0.89 (p < 0.001)。效标相关效度为并发效度,与外部效标的相关系数为0.73 (p < 0.001)。对于内容效度,回答“问卷很好或在一定程度上代表了压力源”的被试占总被试的81%。通过信度和效度的验证,本研究编制的量表是一个可用的量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hiroshima journal of medical sciences
Hiroshima journal of medical sciences Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信