Methods to evaluate compliance of patients with removable appliances-survey results.

H Meyer-Gutknecht, U Fritz, T C Schott
{"title":"Methods to evaluate compliance of patients with removable appliances-survey results.","authors":"H Meyer-Gutknecht,&nbsp;U Fritz,&nbsp;T C Schott","doi":"10.1007/s00056-013-0202-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Are removable appliances still being routinely used in orthodontic offices? Which methods do clinicians use to assess compliance with wear requirements, and how effective are these methods considered to be?</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>A questionnaire inquiring about types of treatment, methods of assessing patient compliance with removable appliances, and the perceived effectiveness of these methods was mailed to a sample of 375 members of the German Orthodontic Society (\"Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kieferorthopädie\", DGKFO).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of returned questionnaires was 29%. Almost all respondents (99%) indicated that they used removable appliances and reported having a \"relatively high\" proportion of patients currently undergoing such treatment. The most widely used methods of compliance assessment were questioning patients and parents (96%) and examining clinical parameters associated with the dentition and the appliance's fit (95-100%). While these parameters were considered \"highly effective\", questioning the patients and parents was regarded as \"less effective\" despite its frequent application.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Removable appliances continue to be a standard method of orthodontic treatment. While patient compliance with wear requirements is mainly assessed via indirect clinical methods, the effectiveness of these parameters remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":149550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kieferorthopädie","volume":" ","pages":"144-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00056-013-0202-8","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kieferorthopädie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-013-0202-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objectives: Are removable appliances still being routinely used in orthodontic offices? Which methods do clinicians use to assess compliance with wear requirements, and how effective are these methods considered to be?

Subjects and methods: A questionnaire inquiring about types of treatment, methods of assessing patient compliance with removable appliances, and the perceived effectiveness of these methods was mailed to a sample of 375 members of the German Orthodontic Society ("Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kieferorthopädie", DGKFO).

Results: The rate of returned questionnaires was 29%. Almost all respondents (99%) indicated that they used removable appliances and reported having a "relatively high" proportion of patients currently undergoing such treatment. The most widely used methods of compliance assessment were questioning patients and parents (96%) and examining clinical parameters associated with the dentition and the appliance's fit (95-100%). While these parameters were considered "highly effective", questioning the patients and parents was regarded as "less effective" despite its frequent application.

Conclusion: Removable appliances continue to be a standard method of orthodontic treatment. While patient compliance with wear requirements is mainly assessed via indirect clinical methods, the effectiveness of these parameters remains unclear.

方法:评价可移动器械患者的依从性——调查结果。
目的:可移动矫治器仍在正畸诊所常规使用吗?临床医生使用哪些方法来评估是否符合磨损要求?这些方法的有效性如何?对象和方法:向德国正畸学会(“Deutschen Gesellschaft f Kieferorthopädie”,DGKFO)的375名成员邮寄了一份调查问卷,询问治疗类型、评估患者对可移动矫治器依从性的方法以及这些方法的有效性。结果:问卷回收率为29%。几乎所有答复者(99%)都表示他们使用过可移动器具,并报告目前接受此类治疗的患者比例“相对较高”。最广泛使用的依从性评估方法是询问患者和家长(96%)和检查与牙列和矫治器配合相关的临床参数(95-100%)。虽然这些参数被认为是“高效的”,但询问患者和家长被认为是“低效的”,尽管它经常被使用。结论:可移动矫治器仍然是正畸治疗的标准方法。虽然主要通过间接临床方法评估患者对佩戴要求的依从性,但这些参数的有效性尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书