Validity of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for cranio-maxillofacial anthropometric measurements.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery Pub Date : 2014-09-01 Epub Date: 2013-04-05 DOI:10.1007/s10006-013-0404-7
Philipp Metzler, Yi Sun, Wolfgang Zemann, Alexander Bartella, Marc Lehner, Joachim Anton Obwegeser, Astrid L Kruse-Gujer, Heinz-Theo Lübbers
{"title":"Validity of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for cranio-maxillofacial anthropometric measurements.","authors":"Philipp Metzler,&nbsp;Yi Sun,&nbsp;Wolfgang Zemann,&nbsp;Alexander Bartella,&nbsp;Marc Lehner,&nbsp;Joachim Anton Obwegeser,&nbsp;Astrid L Kruse-Gujer,&nbsp;Heinz-Theo Lübbers","doi":"10.1007/s10006-013-0404-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of three-dimensional (3D) photography for anthropometric measurements is of increasing interest, especially in the cranio-maxillofacial field. Before standard implementation, accurate determination of the precision and accuracy of each system is mandatory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mannequin head was labelled with 52 landmarks, and 28 three-dimensional images were taken using a commercially available five-pod 3D photosystem (3D VECTRA; Canfield, Fairfield, NJ) in different head positions. Distances between the landmarks were measured manually using a conventional calliper and compared with the digitally calculated distances acquired from labelling by two independent observers. The experimental set-up accounted for clinical circumstances by varying the positioning (vertical, horizontal, sagittal) of the phantom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the entire calliper measurement data set (n = 410), a significant difference (p = 0.02) between the directly measured and corresponding virtually calculated distances was found. The mean aberration between both modalities covering all data was 7.96 mm. No differences (p = 0.94) between the two groups were found using a cut-off of 10 % (leaving n = 369 distances) due to considerable errors in direct measurements and the necessary manual data translation. The mean diversity of both measurement modalities after cut-off was 1.33 mm (maximum, 6.70 mm). Inter-observer analysis of all 1,326 distances showed no difference (p = 0.99; maximal difference, 0.58 mm) in the digital measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The precision and accuracy of this five-pod 3D photosystem suggests its suitability for clinical applications, particularly anthropometric studies. Three-hundred-and-sixty degree surface-contour mapping of the craniofacial region within milliseconds is particularly useful in paediatric patients. Proper patient positioning is essential for high-quality imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":520733,"journal":{"name":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":" ","pages":"297-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10006-013-0404-7","citationCount":"85","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-013-0404-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

Abstract

Purpose: The use of three-dimensional (3D) photography for anthropometric measurements is of increasing interest, especially in the cranio-maxillofacial field. Before standard implementation, accurate determination of the precision and accuracy of each system is mandatory.

Methods: A mannequin head was labelled with 52 landmarks, and 28 three-dimensional images were taken using a commercially available five-pod 3D photosystem (3D VECTRA; Canfield, Fairfield, NJ) in different head positions. Distances between the landmarks were measured manually using a conventional calliper and compared with the digitally calculated distances acquired from labelling by two independent observers. The experimental set-up accounted for clinical circumstances by varying the positioning (vertical, horizontal, sagittal) of the phantom.

Results: In the entire calliper measurement data set (n = 410), a significant difference (p = 0.02) between the directly measured and corresponding virtually calculated distances was found. The mean aberration between both modalities covering all data was 7.96 mm. No differences (p = 0.94) between the two groups were found using a cut-off of 10 % (leaving n = 369 distances) due to considerable errors in direct measurements and the necessary manual data translation. The mean diversity of both measurement modalities after cut-off was 1.33 mm (maximum, 6.70 mm). Inter-observer analysis of all 1,326 distances showed no difference (p = 0.99; maximal difference, 0.58 mm) in the digital measurements.

Conclusion: The precision and accuracy of this five-pod 3D photosystem suggests its suitability for clinical applications, particularly anthropometric studies. Three-hundred-and-sixty degree surface-contour mapping of the craniofacial region within milliseconds is particularly useful in paediatric patients. Proper patient positioning is essential for high-quality imaging.

三维VECTRA摄影测量表面成像系统用于颅颌面人体测量的有效性。
目的:使用三维(3D)摄影进行人体测量是越来越感兴趣的,特别是在颅颌面领域。在标准实施前,必须准确测定各系统的精密度和准确度。方法:将人体模型头部标记为52个地标,并使用市售的五舱三维光系统(3D VECTRA;Canfield, Fairfield, NJ)在不同的头部位置。使用传统的卡尺手动测量地标之间的距离,并与两个独立观察者通过标记获得的数字计算距离进行比较。实验设置通过改变幻肢的位置(垂直、水平、矢状)来考虑临床情况。结果:在整个卡钳测量数据集(n = 410)中,直接测量的距离与相应的虚拟计算距离之间存在显著差异(p = 0.02)。两种模式覆盖所有数据的平均像差为7.96 mm。由于直接测量和必要的人工数据翻译存在相当大的误差,使用10%的截止值(n = 369距离),两组之间没有发现差异(p = 0.94)。截止后两种测量方式的平均差异为1.33 mm(最大值为6.70 mm)。所有1,326个距离的观察者间分析显示无差异(p = 0.99;数字测量的最大差值为0.58 mm。结论:该五足体三维光系统的精度和准确性表明其适合临床应用,特别是人体测量学研究。在几毫秒内对颅面区域进行360度的表面轮廓测绘对儿科患者特别有用。正确的患者体位对高质量成像至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信