Ineffectiveness of topiramate and levetiracetam in infantile spasms non-responsive to steroids. Open labeled randomized prospective study.

IF 1.3
Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) Pub Date : 2013-04-01
Adel A Mahmoud, Tamer M Rizk, Ahmed A Mansy, Jaffar A Ali, Mohamad A Al-Tannir
{"title":"Ineffectiveness of topiramate and levetiracetam in infantile spasms non-responsive to steroids. Open labeled randomized prospective study.","authors":"Adel A Mahmoud,&nbsp;Tamer M Rizk,&nbsp;Ahmed A Mansy,&nbsp;Jaffar A Ali,&nbsp;Mohamad A Al-Tannir","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of 2 novel antiepileptic drugs, topiramate and levetiracetam, as a second line treatment for infantile spasm when oral steroids fail.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty infants under 2 years with clinically- and EEG-proven infantile spasms that did not respond to prednisone (2mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses) were recruited and randomized into 2 groups. They were randomly assigned to either topiramate (group 1; 1mg/kg/day for 3 days then increased by 1mg/kg/day every third day up to 6mg/kg/day) or levetiracetam (group 2; 10mg/kg/day for 5 days and then increased by 10mg/kg/day every 5 days up to 60mg/kg/day). The study was conducted in the Pediatric Neurology Department at the National Neuroscience Institute of King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between January 2008 and December 2010.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 20 patients included in the final data analysis, 11 (55%) were administered topiramate and 9 (45%) levetiracetam. Eighteen patients did not respond to the first drug, and subsequently to the other drug when crossed-over. Two patients with infantile spasm responded to either one drug without crossover. Their EEGs improved with time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study demonstrated the ineffectiveness of topiramate and levetiracetam suggesting current treatment modalities are grossly inadequate underscoring the urgent need for more research efforts to overcome current deficiencies. Two patients with cryptogenic infantile spasm responded to treatment suggesting the potential for treatment of such patients with these 2 drugs, and merits further multicenter investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520723,"journal":{"name":"Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)","volume":" ","pages":"143-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of 2 novel antiepileptic drugs, topiramate and levetiracetam, as a second line treatment for infantile spasm when oral steroids fail.

Methods: Forty infants under 2 years with clinically- and EEG-proven infantile spasms that did not respond to prednisone (2mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses) were recruited and randomized into 2 groups. They were randomly assigned to either topiramate (group 1; 1mg/kg/day for 3 days then increased by 1mg/kg/day every third day up to 6mg/kg/day) or levetiracetam (group 2; 10mg/kg/day for 5 days and then increased by 10mg/kg/day every 5 days up to 60mg/kg/day). The study was conducted in the Pediatric Neurology Department at the National Neuroscience Institute of King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between January 2008 and December 2010.

Results: Of the 20 patients included in the final data analysis, 11 (55%) were administered topiramate and 9 (45%) levetiracetam. Eighteen patients did not respond to the first drug, and subsequently to the other drug when crossed-over. Two patients with infantile spasm responded to either one drug without crossover. Their EEGs improved with time.

Conclusion: The present study demonstrated the ineffectiveness of topiramate and levetiracetam suggesting current treatment modalities are grossly inadequate underscoring the urgent need for more research efforts to overcome current deficiencies. Two patients with cryptogenic infantile spasm responded to treatment suggesting the potential for treatment of such patients with these 2 drugs, and merits further multicenter investigation.

托吡酯和左乙拉西坦治疗对类固醇无反应的婴儿痉挛无效。开放标签随机前瞻性研究。
目的:比较两种新型抗癫痫药物托吡酯和左乙拉西坦在口服类固醇治疗无效时作为婴儿痉挛的二线治疗的疗效。方法:招募40名2岁以下经临床和脑电图证实的婴儿痉挛,对强的松(2mg/kg/天,分2次给药)无反应的婴儿,随机分为两组。他们被随机分配使用托吡酯(第一组;1mg/kg/天,连续3天,然后每3天增加1mg/kg/天,直至6mg/kg/天)或左乙拉西坦(2组;10mg/kg/天,连续5天,然后每5天增加10mg/kg/天,直到60mg/kg/天)。该研究于2008年1月至2010年12月在沙特阿拉伯王国利雅得法赫德国王医疗城国家神经科学研究所儿科神经内科进行。结果:在最终数据分析的20例患者中,11例(55%)给予托吡酯,9例(45%)给予左乙拉西坦。18名患者对第一种药物无反应,随后在交叉时对另一种药物无反应。两例婴儿痉挛患者对任何一种药物均有反应,无交叉。他们的脑电图随着时间的推移而改善。结论:目前的研究表明托吡酯和左乙拉西坦无效,表明目前的治疗方式严重不足,迫切需要更多的研究努力来克服目前的不足。两例隐源性婴儿痉挛患者对治疗有反应,提示这两种药物治疗此类患者的潜力,值得进一步的多中心研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信