In vitro evaluation of Kedo-S and RaCe rotary files compared to hand files in preparing the root canals of primary molar teeth.

Maryam Tofangchiha, Anita Ebrahimi, Mamak Adel, Fatemeh Kermani, Navid Mohammadi, Rodolfo Reda, Luca Testarelli
{"title":"<i>In vitro</i> evaluation of Kedo-S and RaCe rotary files compared to hand files in preparing the root canals of primary molar teeth.","authors":"Maryam Tofangchiha,&nbsp;Anita Ebrahimi,&nbsp;Mamak Adel,&nbsp;Fatemeh Kermani,&nbsp;Navid Mohammadi,&nbsp;Rodolfo Reda,&nbsp;Luca Testarelli","doi":"10.31083/j.fbe1402014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Considering the advantages of rotary files in instrumenting the root canals of permanent teeth and a lack of adequate data on the use of these systems in primary teeth, the present study aimed to evaluate two rotary files and compare them with hand files in the cleaning efficacy of the root canals of primary molar teeth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the present study, three groups of teeth were prepared with Kedo-S paediatric rotary file system, RaCe (reamer with alternating cutting edges), and hand files (n = 40). The groups were evaluated under a stereomicroscope concerning the cleaning efficacy of the files after cleaning the teeth in the apical, middle, and coronal thirds. The data were analyzed with SPSS 24 (IBM Corporation, USA, 2016) using Fisher's exact test and chi-squared test; statistical significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the apical and middle thirds between the different study groups. However, there were significant differences in the coronal third between the hand file and Kedo-S (<i>p</i> = 0.016) and RaCe and Kedo-S (<i>p</i> = 0.001) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study showed that Kedo-S files were more effective than RaCe and hand files in the coronal area than the hand and RaCe files.</p>","PeriodicalId":73068,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)","volume":"14 2","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbe1402014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and aims: Considering the advantages of rotary files in instrumenting the root canals of permanent teeth and a lack of adequate data on the use of these systems in primary teeth, the present study aimed to evaluate two rotary files and compare them with hand files in the cleaning efficacy of the root canals of primary molar teeth.

Materials and methods: In the present study, three groups of teeth were prepared with Kedo-S paediatric rotary file system, RaCe (reamer with alternating cutting edges), and hand files (n = 40). The groups were evaluated under a stereomicroscope concerning the cleaning efficacy of the files after cleaning the teeth in the apical, middle, and coronal thirds. The data were analyzed with SPSS 24 (IBM Corporation, USA, 2016) using Fisher's exact test and chi-squared test; statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: There were no significant differences in the apical and middle thirds between the different study groups. However, there were significant differences in the coronal third between the hand file and Kedo-S (p = 0.016) and RaCe and Kedo-S (p = 0.001) groups.

Conclusions: The present study showed that Kedo-S files were more effective than RaCe and hand files in the coronal area than the hand and RaCe files.

Kedo-S和RaCe旋转锉与手锉在预备初级磨牙根管中的比较。
背景与目的:考虑到旋转锉在恒牙根管矫正中的优势,以及旋转锉在乳牙根管矫正中的应用缺乏足够的数据,本研究旨在评估两种旋转锉,并将其与手锉对乳牙根管的清洁效果进行比较。材料与方法:本研究采用Kedo-S型儿科旋转锉系统、RaCe(具有交替切削刃的铰刀)和手锉制备三组牙齿(n = 40)。在体视显微镜下观察两组牙尖、中、冠三分之一牙清洁后锉的清洁效果。数据分析采用SPSS 24 (IBM Corporation, USA, 2016),采用Fisher精确检验和卡方检验;p < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:不同研究组间根尖和中三分之一的差异无统计学意义。然而,手锉组和Kedo-S组以及RaCe组和Kedo-S组的冠状三分之一有显著差异(p = 0.016)。结论:Kedo-S锉在冠状区比RaCe和hand锉更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信