Efficacy of prophylactic platelet rich plasma (PRP) following open saphenous vein harvesting in cardiac surgery.

Federica Jiritano, Raffaele Serra, Antonio Nenna, Antonio Curcillo, Francesco Villella, Francesco Nappi, Camilla Chello, Massimo Chello, Pasquale Mastroroberto, Giuseppe Filiberto Serraino
{"title":"Efficacy of prophylactic platelet rich plasma (PRP) following open saphenous vein harvesting in cardiac surgery.","authors":"Federica Jiritano,&nbsp;Raffaele Serra,&nbsp;Antonio Nenna,&nbsp;Antonio Curcillo,&nbsp;Francesco Villella,&nbsp;Francesco Nappi,&nbsp;Camilla Chello,&nbsp;Massimo Chello,&nbsp;Pasquale Mastroroberto,&nbsp;Giuseppe Filiberto Serraino","doi":"10.31083/j.fbe1402012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wound infection represents a frequent trouble following open saphenous vein harvesting in cardiac surgery. Platelets' growth factors are crucial for the healing process. Prophylactic platelet rich plasma (PRP) application on leg wound might reduce the incidence of saphenous vein harvest site infections in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2009 and December 2020, 987 consecutive patients underwent CABG using saphenous vein as conduit graft and were retrospectively divided into two groups. All patients had standard surgical leg wound closure and wound care, but treatment group received adjunctive topical application of PRP (no-PRP and PRP group, respectively). The primary outcome was wound infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Saphenous vein harvest site infection rate was similar between PRP (3.5%) and No-PRP (5.2%) group, <i>p</i> = 0.215. The ASEPSIS score was lower for the PRP group (PRP: 3.6 ± 9.1 vs. No-PRP: 5.3 ± 11.2; <i>p</i> = 0.014). Performing a subgroup analysis, the diabetic patients (PRP-DM) group had a lower rate of infection than control group (No-PRP DM) (2.6% vs. 7.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.026). PRP-DM patients had an inferior ASEPSIS score (PRP-DM: 2.7 ± 8.3 vs. No PRP-DM: 7.5 ± 13.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Topical application of autologous PRP on saphenoug vein harvest site might reduce the rate of surgical site infection, with particular benefit among diabetic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73068,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)","volume":"14 2","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbe1402012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Wound infection represents a frequent trouble following open saphenous vein harvesting in cardiac surgery. Platelets' growth factors are crucial for the healing process. Prophylactic platelet rich plasma (PRP) application on leg wound might reduce the incidence of saphenous vein harvest site infections in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2020, 987 consecutive patients underwent CABG using saphenous vein as conduit graft and were retrospectively divided into two groups. All patients had standard surgical leg wound closure and wound care, but treatment group received adjunctive topical application of PRP (no-PRP and PRP group, respectively). The primary outcome was wound infection.

Results: Saphenous vein harvest site infection rate was similar between PRP (3.5%) and No-PRP (5.2%) group, p = 0.215. The ASEPSIS score was lower for the PRP group (PRP: 3.6 ± 9.1 vs. No-PRP: 5.3 ± 11.2; p = 0.014). Performing a subgroup analysis, the diabetic patients (PRP-DM) group had a lower rate of infection than control group (No-PRP DM) (2.6% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.026). PRP-DM patients had an inferior ASEPSIS score (PRP-DM: 2.7 ± 8.3 vs. No PRP-DM: 7.5 ± 13.2, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Topical application of autologous PRP on saphenoug vein harvest site might reduce the rate of surgical site infection, with particular benefit among diabetic patients.

心脏手术中开放隐静脉采血后预防性富血小板血浆(PRP)的疗效。
背景:伤口感染是心脏手术中开放隐静脉采集后的常见问题。血小板的生长因子对愈合过程至关重要。预防性富血小板血浆(PRP)应用于腿部创面可降低冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)患者隐静脉采收部位感染的发生率。方法:2009年1月至2020年12月,连续987例患者采用隐静脉作为导管移植行冠脉搭桥术,回顾性分为两组。所有患者均进行了标准的手术腿部伤口闭合和伤口护理,治疗组辅助局部应用PRP(分别为无PRP组和PRP组)。主要结局为伤口感染。结果:PRP组和No-PRP组的隐静脉采伐部位感染率无显著差异(p = 0.215),前者为3.5%,后者为5.2%。PRP组的ASEPSIS评分较低(PRP: 3.6±9.1 vs. No-PRP: 5.3±11.2;P = 0.014)。进行亚组分析,糖尿病患者(PRP-DM)组的感染率低于对照组(No-PRP DM) (2.6% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.026)。PRP-DM患者的ASEPSIS评分较低(PRP-DM: 2.7±8.3 vs.无PRP-DM: 7.5±13.2,p < 0.001)。结论:自体PRP局部应用于隐静脉采收部位可降低手术部位的感染率,尤其对糖尿病患者疗效显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信