The effect of stimulus number on the stability of responses for an extensive heat pain test.

IF 1.1
Somatosensory & motor research Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-04-23 DOI:10.3109/08990220.2012.671203
Chee-Wee Tan, Shea T Palmer, Denis J Martin
{"title":"The effect of stimulus number on the stability of responses for an extensive heat pain test.","authors":"Chee-Wee Tan,&nbsp;Shea T Palmer,&nbsp;Denis J Martin","doi":"10.3109/08990220.2012.671203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of relatively lower stimulus presentation numbers in quantitative sensory testing may influence the computation accuracy of participants' discriminability. The minimum trial number for obtaining a stabilized participant discrimination ability was determined.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twelve participants' ability to discriminate between noxious heat stimuli pairs (45°C/46°C, 46°C/47°C, and 47°C/48°C) was assessed using a six-category confidence rating scale. Heat stimuli were administered to the forearm. Two conditions with presentation numbers of 17 trials per stimulus (representing the median number of trials in previous studies) and 40 trials per stimulus (used in a previous study with a similar protocol) were used.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Participants' discriminability stabilized at approximately the 20th trial based on the lowest frequency of indeterminate and non-model conforming results under both conditions. A simple linear regression model showed a statistically significant positive relationship between discriminability for the two conditions (slope = 0.65, p < 0.001; constant = 0.33, p = 0.02; r(2 )= 0.51). As a rule of thumb, approximately 20 trials per stimulus intensity could be used to obtain a stabilized discriminability outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":94211,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory & motor research","volume":" ","pages":"62-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/08990220.2012.671203","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory & motor research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/08990220.2012.671203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of relatively lower stimulus presentation numbers in quantitative sensory testing may influence the computation accuracy of participants' discriminability. The minimum trial number for obtaining a stabilized participant discrimination ability was determined.

Materials and methods: Twelve participants' ability to discriminate between noxious heat stimuli pairs (45°C/46°C, 46°C/47°C, and 47°C/48°C) was assessed using a six-category confidence rating scale. Heat stimuli were administered to the forearm. Two conditions with presentation numbers of 17 trials per stimulus (representing the median number of trials in previous studies) and 40 trials per stimulus (used in a previous study with a similar protocol) were used.

Results and discussion: Participants' discriminability stabilized at approximately the 20th trial based on the lowest frequency of indeterminate and non-model conforming results under both conditions. A simple linear regression model showed a statistically significant positive relationship between discriminability for the two conditions (slope = 0.65, p < 0.001; constant = 0.33, p = 0.02; r(2 )= 0.51). As a rule of thumb, approximately 20 trials per stimulus intensity could be used to obtain a stabilized discriminability outcome.

刺激数对大范围热痛试验反应稳定性的影响。
背景:在定量感官测试中使用相对较低的刺激呈现数可能会影响被试辨别能力的计算准确性。确定了稳定被试辨别能力所需的最小试验次数。材料和方法:使用六类置信度量表评估12名参与者区分有害热刺激对(45°C/46°C、46°C/47°C和47°C/48°C)的能力。前臂进行热刺激。使用了两种条件,每种刺激的呈现次数为17次(代表先前研究中试验次数的中位数)和每种刺激的呈现次数为40次(在先前具有类似方案的研究中使用)。结果和讨论:基于两种情况下不确定和不符合模型结果的最低频率,参与者的判别性稳定在大约第20次试验时。一个简单的线性回归模型显示,两种情况的可判别性之间存在统计学上显著的正相关关系(斜率= 0.65,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信