Socioeconomic differences associated with consumption of a plant-based diet: Results from the national health and nutrition examination survey.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrition and health Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-22 DOI:10.1177/02601060221109669
Mia R Gonzalgo, Sirpi Nackeeran, Ali Mouzannar, Ruben Blachman-Braun
{"title":"Socioeconomic differences associated with consumption of a plant-based diet: Results from the national health and nutrition examination survey.","authors":"Mia R Gonzalgo, Sirpi Nackeeran, Ali Mouzannar, Ruben Blachman-Braun","doi":"10.1177/02601060221109669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A plant-based diet (PBD) has been associated with potential health benefits, but factors that may affect access to and consumption of a PBD are not well defined.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the association between socioeconomic status and plant-based dietary consumption among participants enrolled in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study using data obtained from the NHANES database. The following covariates were assessed: age, sex, race/ethnicity, educational level, marital status, smoking status, physical activity, alcohol use, history of diabetes, and hypertension. Socioeconomic status was categorized according to poverty-income ratio (PIR). Food frequency questionnaires were used to calculate previously validated plant-based diet index (PDI) and healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI). Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was performed to determine the association between PIR, clinical, demographic, and plant-based diet indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5037 participants were in the final analytic sample. Median age of participants was 51 ± 18.5 years. Overall PDI and hPDI were 50 [46-54] and 52 [47-57], respectively. Median PDI index was significantly different among PIR groups (PDI, p = 0.018; hPDI, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, participants in the poorest socioeconomic group (PIR ≤ 130%) were more likely to have lower consumption of a healthful PBD (hPDI).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower socioeconomic status (PIR ≤ 130%) was associated with decreased consumption of a healthful plant-based diet. These data suggest that socioeconomic disparities may limit consumption of healthier food and contribute to the high prevalence of adverse health conditions that exist in certain population groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060221109669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A plant-based diet (PBD) has been associated with potential health benefits, but factors that may affect access to and consumption of a PBD are not well defined.

Aim: To determine the association between socioeconomic status and plant-based dietary consumption among participants enrolled in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study using data obtained from the NHANES database. The following covariates were assessed: age, sex, race/ethnicity, educational level, marital status, smoking status, physical activity, alcohol use, history of diabetes, and hypertension. Socioeconomic status was categorized according to poverty-income ratio (PIR). Food frequency questionnaires were used to calculate previously validated plant-based diet index (PDI) and healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI). Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was performed to determine the association between PIR, clinical, demographic, and plant-based diet indices.

Results: A total of 5037 participants were in the final analytic sample. Median age of participants was 51 ± 18.5 years. Overall PDI and hPDI were 50 [46-54] and 52 [47-57], respectively. Median PDI index was significantly different among PIR groups (PDI, p = 0.018; hPDI, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, participants in the poorest socioeconomic group (PIR ≤ 130%) were more likely to have lower consumption of a healthful PBD (hPDI).

Conclusion: Lower socioeconomic status (PIR ≤ 130%) was associated with decreased consumption of a healthful plant-based diet. These data suggest that socioeconomic disparities may limit consumption of healthier food and contribute to the high prevalence of adverse health conditions that exist in certain population groups.

与植物性饮食消费相关的社会经济差异:全国健康与营养状况调查的结果。
背景:植物性膳食(PBD)与潜在的健康益处有关,但可能影响植物性膳食获取和消费的因素尚未明确:这是一项横断面研究,使用的数据来自 NHANES 数据库。对以下协变量进行了评估:年龄、性别、种族/民族、教育程度、婚姻状况、吸烟状况、体力活动、饮酒、糖尿病史和高血压。社会经济状况根据贫困收入比(PIR)进行分类。食物频率调查问卷用于计算之前验证过的植物性饮食指数(PDI)和健康植物性饮食指数(hPDI)。为确定 PIR、临床、人口统计学和植物性饮食指数之间的关系,进行了多变量调整逻辑回归:最终分析样本中共有 5037 名参与者。参与者的中位年龄为 51 ± 18.5 岁。总体 PDI 和 hPDI 分别为 50 [46-54] 和 52 [47-57]。各 PIR 组的 PDI 指数中位数有明显差异(PDI,P = 0.018;hPDI,P = 0.018):较低的社会经济地位(PIR ≤ 130%)与健康植物性饮食消费减少有关。这些数据表明,社会经济差异可能会限制人们消费更健康的食物,并导致某些人群不良健康状况的高发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition and health
Nutrition and health Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信