The effects of sex and gender role on responses to pressure pain.

Psycho-social medicine Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-02-28 DOI:10.3205/psm000079
Birgit Kröner-Herwig, Jennifer Gaßmann, Marie Tromsdorf, Elfi Zahrend
{"title":"The effects of sex and gender role on responses to pressure pain.","authors":"Birgit Kröner-Herwig,&nbsp;Jennifer Gaßmann,&nbsp;Marie Tromsdorf,&nbsp;Elfi Zahrend","doi":"10.3205/psm000079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several studies on experimental mechanical pain suggested a strong influence of sex demonstrating females to be more sensitive. We examined the hypothesis that not only sex but also gender role affects pain responsiveness and looked for mediators of this effect.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>As indicators of pain the threshold the intensity and the unpleasantness of pressure stimuli were measured, as well as sensory and affective quality of pain. The gender role of 74 students was assessed by the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI). Furthermore several psychological variables assumed to be potential mediators (catastrophising, fear of pain, depressive symptoms, pain coping) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ANOVA revealed significant main effects of sex in all pain variables except affective quality of pain. Contrary to our hypothesis gender role had no influence on pain responses, neither was there an interaction of sex and gender. Fear of pain just missed the significance level identifying it as mediator of the sex effect on affective pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, our study corroborated previous findings that women are more responsive to mechanical pain stimuli with effect sizes being medium to large, whereas gender role did not predict any of the assessed pain parameters. No convincing evidence was found that the influence of sex is predominantly mediated by psychological characteristics of the individual.</p>","PeriodicalId":88305,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-social medicine","volume":" ","pages":"Doc01"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/psm000079","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/psm000079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Background: Several studies on experimental mechanical pain suggested a strong influence of sex demonstrating females to be more sensitive. We examined the hypothesis that not only sex but also gender role affects pain responsiveness and looked for mediators of this effect.

Method: As indicators of pain the threshold the intensity and the unpleasantness of pressure stimuli were measured, as well as sensory and affective quality of pain. The gender role of 74 students was assessed by the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI). Furthermore several psychological variables assumed to be potential mediators (catastrophising, fear of pain, depressive symptoms, pain coping) were obtained.

Results: ANOVA revealed significant main effects of sex in all pain variables except affective quality of pain. Contrary to our hypothesis gender role had no influence on pain responses, neither was there an interaction of sex and gender. Fear of pain just missed the significance level identifying it as mediator of the sex effect on affective pain.

Conclusions: In summary, our study corroborated previous findings that women are more responsive to mechanical pain stimuli with effect sizes being medium to large, whereas gender role did not predict any of the assessed pain parameters. No convincing evidence was found that the influence of sex is predominantly mediated by psychological characteristics of the individual.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

性别和性别角色对压痛反应的影响。
背景:几项关于实验性机械性疼痛的研究表明,性别对疼痛有很强的影响,表明女性对疼痛更敏感。我们检验了不仅性别而且性别角色影响疼痛反应的假设,并寻找这种影响的中介。方法:测量压力刺激的阈值、强度和不愉快程度以及疼痛的感觉和情感质量作为疼痛的指标。采用Bem性别角色量表(BSRI)对74名学生进行性别角色评估。此外,还获得了几个被认为是潜在中介的心理变量(灾难化、对疼痛的恐惧、抑郁症状、疼痛应对)。结果:方差分析显示,除疼痛的情感质量外,性别对所有疼痛变量都有显著的主要影响。与我们的假设相反,性别角色对疼痛反应没有影响,也没有性别和性别的相互作用。对疼痛的恐惧刚好没有达到显著性水平,这表明它是性别对情感疼痛影响的中介。结论:总之,我们的研究证实了之前的研究结果,即女性对机械疼痛刺激的反应更灵敏,效应量为中到大,而性别角色并不能预测任何评估的疼痛参数。没有令人信服的证据表明,性别的影响主要是由个体的心理特征介导的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书