Commentary regarding recent Million Women Study critique and subsequent publicity.

Nick Panay
{"title":"Commentary regarding recent Million Women Study critique and subsequent publicity.","authors":"Nick Panay","doi":"10.1258/mi.2012.012006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"of critique The Million Women Study (MWS) was one of the major studies that raised concerns over the long-term safety of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Shapiro et al. applied causal criteria, such as biases and biological plausibility, to assess the MWS findings. Their analysis highlighted several design flaws that would potentially have skewed the findings; the key criticisms of the MWS design were as follows:","PeriodicalId":87478,"journal":{"name":"Menopause international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1258/mi.2012.012006","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1258/mi.2012.012006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

of critique The Million Women Study (MWS) was one of the major studies that raised concerns over the long-term safety of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Shapiro et al. applied causal criteria, such as biases and biological plausibility, to assess the MWS findings. Their analysis highlighted several design flaws that would potentially have skewed the findings; the key criticisms of the MWS design were as follows:
关于最近的百万妇女研究的评论和随后的宣传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信