Mood, motivation, and misinformation: aging and affective state influences on memory.

Thomas M Hess, Lauren E Popham, Lisa Emery, Tonya Elliott
{"title":"Mood, motivation, and misinformation: aging and affective state influences on memory.","authors":"Thomas M Hess,&nbsp;Lauren E Popham,&nbsp;Lisa Emery,&nbsp;Tonya Elliott","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2011.622740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Normative age differences in memory have typically been attributed to declines in basic cognitive and cortical mechanisms. The present study examined the degree to which dominant everyday affect might also be associated with age-related memory errors using the misinformation paradigm. Younger and older adults viewed a positive and a negative event, and then were exposed to misinformation about each event. Older adults exhibited a higher likelihood than young adults of falsely identifying misinformation as having occurred in the events. Consistent with expectations, strength of the misinformation effect was positively associated with dominant mood, and controlling for mood eliminated any age effects. Also, motivation to engage in complex cognitive activity was negatively associated with susceptibility to misinformation, and susceptibility was stronger for negative than for positive events. We argue that motivational processes underlie all of the observed effects, and that such processes are useful in understanding age differences in memory performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":520721,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition","volume":" ","pages":"13-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13825585.2011.622740","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2011.622740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Normative age differences in memory have typically been attributed to declines in basic cognitive and cortical mechanisms. The present study examined the degree to which dominant everyday affect might also be associated with age-related memory errors using the misinformation paradigm. Younger and older adults viewed a positive and a negative event, and then were exposed to misinformation about each event. Older adults exhibited a higher likelihood than young adults of falsely identifying misinformation as having occurred in the events. Consistent with expectations, strength of the misinformation effect was positively associated with dominant mood, and controlling for mood eliminated any age effects. Also, motivation to engage in complex cognitive activity was negatively associated with susceptibility to misinformation, and susceptibility was stronger for negative than for positive events. We argue that motivational processes underlie all of the observed effects, and that such processes are useful in understanding age differences in memory performance.

情绪、动机和错误信息:年龄和情感状态对记忆的影响。
记忆的标准年龄差异通常归因于基本认知和皮层机制的衰退。目前的研究使用错误信息范式检验了主导日常情绪与年龄相关记忆错误的关联程度。年轻人和老年人分别看到积极和消极的事件,然后接触到关于每个事件的错误信息。老年人比年轻人更有可能错误地识别事件中发生的错误信息。与预期一致,错误信息效应的强度与主导情绪呈正相关,控制情绪消除了任何年龄影响。此外,参与复杂认知活动的动机与对错误信息的易感性呈负相关,对负面事件的易感性强于对积极事件的易感性。我们认为,动机过程是所有观察到的影响的基础,并且这些过程对于理解记忆表现的年龄差异是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信