Jorge Alberto Cortés, Alejandro Concha M, Luis Eduardo Cediel T, Juan Sebastián Castillo
{"title":"[Diagnostic methods in candidemia: a systematic review of literature with meta-analysis].","authors":"Jorge Alberto Cortés, Alejandro Concha M, Luis Eduardo Cediel T, Juan Sebastián Castillo","doi":"/S0716-10182011000600006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Candidemia is a disease with high morbidity and mortality especially in critical care patients. Early diagnosis enables early treatment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To conduct a systematic review of the literature in order to establish the best laboratory tests for the diagnosis of candidemia in critical patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of available literature in PubMed. Serological studies were subjected to meta-analysis in metadisk-Beta 1.1.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4 studies of 1286 reviewed were included. Three were about serological tests and one about molecular testing (RT-PCR). The sensitivity and specificity for RT-PCR, antibody testing and antigen and antibody tests were 87% and 100%, 47.5% and 82.6%, 96% and 81%, respectively. Diagnostic Odds Ratio of antigenemia was 1.51 (95% CI = 0,032-70,964, p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RT-PCR has better diagnostic performance, measuring antigenemia plus antibodies improves sensitivity, specificity, LR + and LR-- . There is insufficient evidence to support this.</p>","PeriodicalId":520768,"journal":{"name":"Revista chilena de infectologia : organo oficial de la Sociedad Chilena de Infectologia","volume":" ","pages":"423-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista chilena de infectologia : organo oficial de la Sociedad Chilena de Infectologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org//S0716-10182011000600006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Unlabelled: Candidemia is a disease with high morbidity and mortality especially in critical care patients. Early diagnosis enables early treatment.
Objectives: To conduct a systematic review of the literature in order to establish the best laboratory tests for the diagnosis of candidemia in critical patients.
Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic review of available literature in PubMed. Serological studies were subjected to meta-analysis in metadisk-Beta 1.1.1.
Results: 4 studies of 1286 reviewed were included. Three were about serological tests and one about molecular testing (RT-PCR). The sensitivity and specificity for RT-PCR, antibody testing and antigen and antibody tests were 87% and 100%, 47.5% and 82.6%, 96% and 81%, respectively. Diagnostic Odds Ratio of antigenemia was 1.51 (95% CI = 0,032-70,964, p = 0.001).
Conclusions: RT-PCR has better diagnostic performance, measuring antigenemia plus antibodies improves sensitivity, specificity, LR + and LR-- . There is insufficient evidence to support this.
念珠菌病是一种高发病率和死亡率的疾病,特别是在重症监护患者中。早诊断就能早治疗。目的:对文献进行系统回顾,以建立诊断危重患者念珠菌病的最佳实验室检查方法。材料和方法:我们对PubMed上的现有文献进行了系统的综述。血清学研究在metadisk-Beta 1.1.1中进行meta分析。结果:共纳入4项研究,共1286项。其中3例为血清学检测,1例为分子检测(RT-PCR)。RT-PCR检测、抗体检测和抗原抗体检测的敏感性和特异性分别为87%和100%、47.5%和82.6%、96%和81%。抗原血症的诊断优势比为1.51 (95% CI = 0,032-70,964, p = 0.001)。结论:RT-PCR具有较好的诊断性能,检测抗原血症加抗体可提高敏感性、特异性、LR +和LR—。没有足够的证据支持这一点。