Solar Cycle Prediction

IF 23 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Kristóf Petrovay
{"title":"Solar Cycle Prediction","authors":"Kristóf Petrovay","doi":"10.12942/lrsp-2010-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A review of solar cycle prediction methods and their performance is given, including forecasts for cycle 24. The review focuses on those aspects of the solar cycle prediction problem that have a bearing on dynamo theory. The scope of the review is further restricted to the issue of predicting the amplitude (and optionally the epoch) of an upcoming solar maximum no later than right after the start of the given cycle.</p><p>Prediction methods form three main groups. <i>Precursor methods</i> rely on the value of some measure of solar activity or magnetism at a specified time to predict the amplitude of the following solar maximum. Their implicit assumption is that each numbered solar cycle is a consistent unit in itself, while solar activity seems to consist of a series of much less tightly intercorrelated individual cycles. <i>Extrapolation methods</i>, in contrast, are based on the premise that the physical process giving rise to the sunspot number record is statistically homogeneous, i.e., the mathematical regularities underlying its variations are the same at any point of time and, therefore, it lends itself to analysis and forecasting by time series methods. Finally, instead of an analysis of observational data alone, <i>model based predictions</i> use physically (more or less) consistent dynamo models in their attempts to predict solar activity.</p><p>In their overall performance during the course of the last few solar cycles, precursor methods have clearly been superior to extrapolation methods. Nevertheless, most precursor methods overpredicted cycle 23, while some extrapolation methods may still be worth further study. Model based forecasts have not yet had a chance to prove their skills. One method that has yielded predictions consistently in the right range during the past few solar cycles is that of K. Schatten <i>et al.</i>, whose approach is mainly based on the polar field precursor.</p><p>The incipient cycle 24 will probably mark the end of the Modern Maximum, with the Sun switching to a state of less strong activity. It will therefore be an important testbed for cycle prediction methods and, by inference, for our understanding of the solar dynamo.</p>","PeriodicalId":687,"journal":{"name":"Living Reviews in Solar Physics","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":23.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.12942/lrsp-2010-6","citationCount":"233","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Living Reviews in Solar Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.12942/lrsp-2010-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 233

Abstract

A review of solar cycle prediction methods and their performance is given, including forecasts for cycle 24. The review focuses on those aspects of the solar cycle prediction problem that have a bearing on dynamo theory. The scope of the review is further restricted to the issue of predicting the amplitude (and optionally the epoch) of an upcoming solar maximum no later than right after the start of the given cycle.

Prediction methods form three main groups. Precursor methods rely on the value of some measure of solar activity or magnetism at a specified time to predict the amplitude of the following solar maximum. Their implicit assumption is that each numbered solar cycle is a consistent unit in itself, while solar activity seems to consist of a series of much less tightly intercorrelated individual cycles. Extrapolation methods, in contrast, are based on the premise that the physical process giving rise to the sunspot number record is statistically homogeneous, i.e., the mathematical regularities underlying its variations are the same at any point of time and, therefore, it lends itself to analysis and forecasting by time series methods. Finally, instead of an analysis of observational data alone, model based predictions use physically (more or less) consistent dynamo models in their attempts to predict solar activity.

In their overall performance during the course of the last few solar cycles, precursor methods have clearly been superior to extrapolation methods. Nevertheless, most precursor methods overpredicted cycle 23, while some extrapolation methods may still be worth further study. Model based forecasts have not yet had a chance to prove their skills. One method that has yielded predictions consistently in the right range during the past few solar cycles is that of K. Schatten et al., whose approach is mainly based on the polar field precursor.

The incipient cycle 24 will probably mark the end of the Modern Maximum, with the Sun switching to a state of less strong activity. It will therefore be an important testbed for cycle prediction methods and, by inference, for our understanding of the solar dynamo.

Abstract Image

太阳周期预测
综述了太阳周期预测方法及其性能,包括太阳周期24的预报。本文对太阳周期预测问题中与发电机理论有关的几个方面进行了综述。审查的范围进一步局限于预测不迟于给定周期开始后即将到来的太阳极大期的振幅(以及可选的历元)的问题。预测方法主要分为三类。前兆方法依靠某一特定时间太阳活动或磁力的测量值来预测下一次太阳活动极大期的振幅。他们隐含的假设是,每一个编号的太阳活动周期本身都是一个一致的单位,而太阳活动似乎是由一系列相互关联不那么紧密的单个周期组成的。相反,外推方法的前提是,产生太阳黑子数记录的物理过程在统计上是均匀的,即其变化的数学规律在任何时间点都是相同的,因此,它适合于用时间序列方法进行分析和预测。最后,模型预测不是单独分析观测数据,而是使用物理上(或多或少)一致的发电机模型来试图预测太阳活动。在最近几个太阳活动周期的总体表现中,前体方法明显优于外推方法。然而,大多数前驱方法都高估了23周期,而一些外推方法仍值得进一步研究。基于模型的预测还没有机会证明它们的技能。在过去的几个太阳活动周期中,K. Schatten等人的预测结果始终在正确的范围内,这是一种方法,其方法主要基于极地磁场前体。太阳活动周期的开始很可能标志着现代极大期的结束,太阳活动将转向一种不那么强烈的状态。因此,它将成为周期预测方法的重要试验台,并通过推断,为我们对太阳能发电机的理解提供了一个重要的试验台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Living Reviews in Solar Physics
Living Reviews in Solar Physics Earth and Planetary Sciences-Space and Planetary Science
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
3
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Living Reviews in Solar Physics is a peer-reviewed, full open access, and exclusively online journal, publishing freely available reviews of research in all areas of solar and heliospheric physics. Articles are solicited from leading authorities and are directed towards the scientific community at or above the graduate-student level. The articles in Living Reviews provide critical reviews of the current state of research in the fields they cover. They evaluate existing work, place it in a meaningful context, and suggest areas where more work and new results are needed. Articles also offer annotated insights into the key literature and describe other available resources. Living Reviews is unique in maintaining a suite of high-quality reviews, which are kept up-to-date by the authors. This is the meaning of the word "living" in the journal''s title.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信