[Prevalence of disability among leprosy patients and effectiveness of leprosy reaction services with standard prednisolone treatment at field level in an endemic country--some data from joint leprosy research collaboration in Myanmar].

Q4 Medicine
Yutaka Ishida
{"title":"[Prevalence of disability among leprosy patients and effectiveness of leprosy reaction services with standard prednisolone treatment at field level in an endemic country--some data from joint leprosy research collaboration in Myanmar].","authors":"Yutaka Ishida","doi":"10.5025/hansen.78.277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prevalence of disability among leprosy patients and effectiveness of standard predonisolone treatment for leprosy reaction at field level in some place of Myanmar are shown in this paper as results of joint leprosy research collaboration. WHO disability grading was measured for all newly registered leprosy patients through 2007 in 5 selected townships of Ayeyarwaddy Division, with the results of G0 = 66.3%, GI = 18.9%, GII = 14.7% (N = 95). The cross-sectional disability survey at selected 9 townships in Mandalay, Sagaing and Magway Division for all registered patients who had completed WHO/MDT done by JICA project in 2003/4 showed G0 = 62.5%, GI = 2.4%, GII = 35.1% (N = 10,528). From these two data, it is supposed that considerable number of patients with G1 at registered time developed worsening of disability from G1 to G2. Proportion of G0 also reduced a little bit in patients who completed WHO/MDT. Early detection and proper treatment of leprosy reaction are one of the main issues of prevention of disability. Effectiveness of leprosy reaction services were evaluated at Mandalay Special Skin Clinic, where WHO fixed regimen of prednisolone were given as routine service. 100 cases were evaluated who developed leprosy reactions from 1st December 2007 to 31st December 2008 and identified severe reaction who needed oral prednisolone treatment. Evaluation criteria of \"effective\" was defined as \"no more signs and symptoms of reactions were present after treatment. And \"less effective\" was defined as \"more than one of signs and symptoms were still remained after treatment\". Over all \"effective\" was 36 (36%) and \"less effective\" was 64 (64%). It was also found that rates of improvement of nerve functions, either in sensory or in motor, were little after the standard treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":35918,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Leprosy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5025/hansen.78.277","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Leprosy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5025/hansen.78.277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Prevalence of disability among leprosy patients and effectiveness of standard predonisolone treatment for leprosy reaction at field level in some place of Myanmar are shown in this paper as results of joint leprosy research collaboration. WHO disability grading was measured for all newly registered leprosy patients through 2007 in 5 selected townships of Ayeyarwaddy Division, with the results of G0 = 66.3%, GI = 18.9%, GII = 14.7% (N = 95). The cross-sectional disability survey at selected 9 townships in Mandalay, Sagaing and Magway Division for all registered patients who had completed WHO/MDT done by JICA project in 2003/4 showed G0 = 62.5%, GI = 2.4%, GII = 35.1% (N = 10,528). From these two data, it is supposed that considerable number of patients with G1 at registered time developed worsening of disability from G1 to G2. Proportion of G0 also reduced a little bit in patients who completed WHO/MDT. Early detection and proper treatment of leprosy reaction are one of the main issues of prevention of disability. Effectiveness of leprosy reaction services were evaluated at Mandalay Special Skin Clinic, where WHO fixed regimen of prednisolone were given as routine service. 100 cases were evaluated who developed leprosy reactions from 1st December 2007 to 31st December 2008 and identified severe reaction who needed oral prednisolone treatment. Evaluation criteria of "effective" was defined as "no more signs and symptoms of reactions were present after treatment. And "less effective" was defined as "more than one of signs and symptoms were still remained after treatment". Over all "effective" was 36 (36%) and "less effective" was 64 (64%). It was also found that rates of improvement of nerve functions, either in sensory or in motor, were little after the standard treatment.

[在一个麻风病流行国家,麻风病患者的致残率和麻风病反应服务中标准泼尼松龙治疗的有效性——部分数据来自缅甸麻风病联合研究合作]。
作为联合麻风病研究合作的结果,本文显示了缅甸一些地方麻风病患者致残率和标准强的松龙治疗麻风病反应的有效性。2007年,在伊洛瓦底省选定的5个乡镇对所有新登记的麻风患者进行了世卫组织残疾分级测量,结果为G0 = 66.3%, GI = 18.9%, GII = 14.7% (N = 95)。在曼德勒、实皆和马格威省选定的9个乡镇对2003/4年JICA项目完成who /MDT的所有登记患者进行的横断面残疾调查显示,G0 = 62.5%, GI = 2.4%, GII = 35.1% (N = 10,528)。从这两个数据可以推测,在登记时有相当数量的G1患者从G1到G2的残疾恶化。在完成who /MDT的患者中,G0的比例也略有下降。麻风病反应的早期发现和适当治疗是预防残疾的主要问题之一。在曼德勒特殊皮肤诊所评估了麻风病反应服务的有效性,世卫组织将强的松龙固定方案作为常规服务提供。对2007年12月1日至2008年12月31日期间出现麻风反应的100例病例进行了评估,并确定了需要口服泼尼松龙治疗的严重反应患者。“有效”的评价标准定义为“治疗后不再出现反应的体征和症状”。“效果较差”被定义为“治疗后仍存在一种以上的体征和症状”。总体而言,“有效”的占36(36%),“不太有效”的占64(64%)。还发现,在标准治疗后,感觉或运动神经功能的改善率很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Leprosy
Japanese Journal of Leprosy Medicine-Dermatology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信