Limitations of PET/CT in determining need for neck dissection after primary chemoradiation for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

IF 1.3
Sofia Lyford-Pike, Patrick K Ha, Heather A Jacene, John R Saunders, Ralph P Tufano
{"title":"Limitations of PET/CT in determining need for neck dissection after primary chemoradiation for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Sofia Lyford-Pike,&nbsp;Patrick K Ha,&nbsp;Heather A Jacene,&nbsp;John R Saunders,&nbsp;Ralph P Tufano","doi":"10.1159/000237737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of our study was to evaluate PET/CT in predicting residual nodal disease after primary chemoradiation (CRT) for head and neck cancer (HNSCC) with N2 disease or greater.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted. Thirty-eight patients received primary CRT for HNSCC with N2 or greater disease, PET/CT after treatment and neck dissection from January 2003 to December 2006. PET/CT results were correlated with pathology results from neck dissection specimens for each respective side.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six neck regions were analyzed. Nine were determined to have either PET/CT result reports (n = 5) or pathology reports (n = 4) that were indeterminate. PET/CT demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 57.1 and 73.9%, respectively, an accuracy of 67.5%, a positive predictive value of 57.1% and a negative predictive value of 73.9% when compared to the final pathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PET/CT is neither highly sensitive nor highly specific for identifying residual nodal metastases after CRT for advanced-stage HNSCC. Physicians should not rely solely on PET/CT to determine interventions on the neck after CRT. A standardization of language for reporting findings and risk of residual disease is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":520736,"journal":{"name":"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties","volume":" ","pages":"251-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000237737","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000237737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of our study was to evaluate PET/CT in predicting residual nodal disease after primary chemoradiation (CRT) for head and neck cancer (HNSCC) with N2 disease or greater.

Design: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted. Thirty-eight patients received primary CRT for HNSCC with N2 or greater disease, PET/CT after treatment and neck dissection from January 2003 to December 2006. PET/CT results were correlated with pathology results from neck dissection specimens for each respective side.

Results: Forty-six neck regions were analyzed. Nine were determined to have either PET/CT result reports (n = 5) or pathology reports (n = 4) that were indeterminate. PET/CT demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 57.1 and 73.9%, respectively, an accuracy of 67.5%, a positive predictive value of 57.1% and a negative predictive value of 73.9% when compared to the final pathology.

Conclusion: PET/CT is neither highly sensitive nor highly specific for identifying residual nodal metastases after CRT for advanced-stage HNSCC. Physicians should not rely solely on PET/CT to determine interventions on the neck after CRT. A standardization of language for reporting findings and risk of residual disease is needed.

PET/CT在晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌初次放化疗后确定是否需要颈部清扫的局限性。
目的:本研究的目的是评估PET/CT在原发性放化疗(CRT)后伴有N2或以上疾病的头颈癌(HNSCC)残留淋巴结疾病的预测价值。设计:采用回顾性队列分析。2003年1月至2006年12月,38例伴有N2或N2以上病变的HNSCC患者接受了初始CRT、治疗后PET/CT和颈部清扫。PET/CT结果与各侧颈部解剖标本病理结果相关。结果:对46个颈部区域进行分析。9例确定有PET/CT结果报告(n = 5)或病理报告(n = 4)不确定。PET/CT对最终病理的敏感性和特异性分别为57.1和73.9%,准确率为67.5%,阳性预测值为57.1%,阴性预测值为73.9%。结论:PET/CT对晚期HNSCC CRT后残留淋巴结转移的鉴别既不高敏感性,也不高特异性。医生不应该仅仅依靠PET/CT来确定CRT后颈部的干预措施。报告发现和残留疾病风险的语言需要标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信