Mapping the literature: role of trabectedin as a new chemotherapy option in advanced pretreated soft tissue sarcoma.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
A Le Cesne, J Domont, A Cioffi, S Bonvalot, P Terrier, I Ray-Coquard, V Alfaro, C Lebedinsky, P Santabarbara, J Y Blay
{"title":"Mapping the literature: role of trabectedin as a new chemotherapy option in advanced pretreated soft tissue sarcoma.","authors":"A Le Cesne,&nbsp;J Domont,&nbsp;A Cioffi,&nbsp;S Bonvalot,&nbsp;P Terrier,&nbsp;I Ray-Coquard,&nbsp;V Alfaro,&nbsp;C Lebedinsky,&nbsp;P Santabarbara,&nbsp;J Y Blay","doi":"10.1358/dot.2009.45.6.1378934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This bibliographic review evaluated phase II clinical trials aimed at the identification of antitumor activity of single agents in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after failure of standard- of-care therapy including anthracyclines and ifosfamide. A total of 63 articles (on anthracyclines, ifosfamide, trabectedin and 27 investigational agents) were included (data from 1979 to 2008).Trabectedin is the most extensively studied agent in patients with STS after failure of anthracyclines and ifosfamide (457 patients), followed by ifosfamide (412), cisplatin (144), temozolomide (137), docetaxel (114), gemcitabine (112), etoposide (95) and doxorubicin (59). Dacarbazine and the remaining investigational agents have usually been tested in 50 or fewer patients, with vastly negative results not warranting further investigation. Methodological limitations are identified in the majority of the reviewed phase II studies, including small sample size, single-institution studies, lack of independent review of the antitumor responses and inadequate description of previous therapies/agents. However, all trabectedin studies fulfilled these methodological characteristics relevant for a phase II trial. A phase II randomized trial confirmed the results of 3 prior nonrandomized studies and, therefore, trabectedin is currently considered an important new option to control advanced sarcomas in patients with STS following failure of all conventional treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11397,"journal":{"name":"Drugs of today","volume":" ","pages":"403-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs of today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1358/dot.2009.45.6.1378934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

This bibliographic review evaluated phase II clinical trials aimed at the identification of antitumor activity of single agents in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after failure of standard- of-care therapy including anthracyclines and ifosfamide. A total of 63 articles (on anthracyclines, ifosfamide, trabectedin and 27 investigational agents) were included (data from 1979 to 2008).Trabectedin is the most extensively studied agent in patients with STS after failure of anthracyclines and ifosfamide (457 patients), followed by ifosfamide (412), cisplatin (144), temozolomide (137), docetaxel (114), gemcitabine (112), etoposide (95) and doxorubicin (59). Dacarbazine and the remaining investigational agents have usually been tested in 50 or fewer patients, with vastly negative results not warranting further investigation. Methodological limitations are identified in the majority of the reviewed phase II studies, including small sample size, single-institution studies, lack of independent review of the antitumor responses and inadequate description of previous therapies/agents. However, all trabectedin studies fulfilled these methodological characteristics relevant for a phase II trial. A phase II randomized trial confirmed the results of 3 prior nonrandomized studies and, therefore, trabectedin is currently considered an important new option to control advanced sarcomas in patients with STS following failure of all conventional treatments.

绘制文献:trabectedin作为晚期预处理软组织肉瘤的一种新的化疗选择的作用。
这篇文献综述评估了旨在鉴定标准护理治疗(包括蒽环类药物和异环磷酰胺)失败后单一药物在软组织肉瘤(STS)中的抗肿瘤活性的II期临床试验。共纳入63篇文章(关于蒽环类药物、异环磷酰胺、trabectedin和27种研究用药物)(数据从1979年至2008年)。Trabectedin是蒽环类药物和异环磷酰胺治疗失败后STS患者中研究最广泛的药物(457例),其次是异环磷酰胺(412例)、顺铂(144例)、替莫唑胺(137例)、多西他赛(114例)、吉西他滨(112例)、依托泊苷(95例)和阿霉素(59例)。达卡巴嗪和其他试验性药物通常在50例或更少的患者中进行试验,结果非常阴性,不值得进一步研究。在大多数II期研究中发现了方法学上的局限性,包括样本量小、单机构研究、缺乏对抗肿瘤反应的独立评估以及对既往治疗/药物的描述不充分。然而,所有的trabectedin研究都符合与II期试验相关的方法学特征。一项II期随机试验证实了之前3项非随机研究的结果,因此,trabectedin目前被认为是控制所有常规治疗失败的STS患者晚期肉瘤的重要新选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs of today
Drugs of today 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing monographs on new products entering the market and review articles. Since its inception in 1965, Drugs of Today has established a reputation for excellence in providing physicians and other key healthcare professionals with practical, up-to-date monographs on recently approved and launched drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信