Evaluating the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation in treatment of cervical metastatic lymph nodes of papillary thyroid carcinoma compared to repeat surgery.

IF 3
Wanqing Tang, Wenhai Sun, Xiaoyan Niu, Xufu Wang, Xinya Wang, Mingzhu Zhang, Rongling Wang, Wenbin Jiang, Danni Jiang, Cheng Zhao
{"title":"Evaluating the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation in treatment of cervical metastatic lymph nodes of papillary thyroid carcinoma compared to repeat surgery.","authors":"Wanqing Tang,&nbsp;Wenhai Sun,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Niu,&nbsp;Xufu Wang,&nbsp;Xinya Wang,&nbsp;Mingzhu Zhang,&nbsp;Rongling Wang,&nbsp;Wenbin Jiang,&nbsp;Danni Jiang,&nbsp;Cheng Zhao","doi":"10.1080/02656736.2022.2086713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) versus repeat surgery for treating metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between July 2017 and October 2020, 67 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. 19 and 48 patients underwent MWA and repeat surgery, respectively. The primary and secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival and complication rates, respectively. The largest diameter, volume and volume reduction ratio (VRR) were analyzed before and after MWA. The effects of different ablation powers on the largest diameter, volume and VRR were investigated. Pre and posttreatment variables (e.g., baseline characteristics, serum thyroglobulin [Tg] levels, hospitalization time, treatment costs, recurrence-free survival and complication rates) were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The largest diameter and volume postablation at each follow-up were smaller than the preablation levels (<i>p</i> < 0.05), except at the 1-month follow-up (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The largest diameter, volume, and VRR among the different ablation powers were not significantly different (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The mean serum Tg levels and biochemical remission rates were not significantly different between the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Compared to reoperation, MWA had a shorter hospitalization time and lower treatment cost (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Total and minor complications were higher in the reoperation group (<i>p</i> < 0.05), but major complications were comparable (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The recurrence-free survival rate between groups was not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.401). The 1- and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MWA may be a safe and effective alternative to repeat surgery for treating MLNs of PTC in select patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":520653,"journal":{"name":"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group","volume":" ","pages":"813-821"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2022.2086713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) versus repeat surgery for treating metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).

Methods: Between July 2017 and October 2020, 67 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. 19 and 48 patients underwent MWA and repeat surgery, respectively. The primary and secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival and complication rates, respectively. The largest diameter, volume and volume reduction ratio (VRR) were analyzed before and after MWA. The effects of different ablation powers on the largest diameter, volume and VRR were investigated. Pre and posttreatment variables (e.g., baseline characteristics, serum thyroglobulin [Tg] levels, hospitalization time, treatment costs, recurrence-free survival and complication rates) were compared between groups.

Results: The largest diameter and volume postablation at each follow-up were smaller than the preablation levels (p < 0.05), except at the 1-month follow-up (p > 0.05). The largest diameter, volume, and VRR among the different ablation powers were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The mean serum Tg levels and biochemical remission rates were not significantly different between the groups (p > 0.05). Compared to reoperation, MWA had a shorter hospitalization time and lower treatment cost (p < 0.001). Total and minor complications were higher in the reoperation group (p < 0.05), but major complications were comparable (p > 0.05). The recurrence-free survival rate between groups was not significantly different (p = 0.401). The 1- and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were comparable between the groups.

Conclusions: MWA may be a safe and effective alternative to repeat surgery for treating MLNs of PTC in select patients.

评价微波消融治疗甲状腺乳头状癌颈部转移淋巴结与重复手术的安全性和有效性。
目的:评价微波消融(MWA)与重复手术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)转移性淋巴结的安全性和有效性。方法:2017年7月至2020年10月,67例患者入组回顾性研究。19例和48例分别行MWA和重复手术。主要终点和次要终点分别是无复发生存率和并发症发生率。分析了MWA前后的最大直径、体积和体积缩小比(VRR)。研究了不同烧蚀功率对最大直径、体积和VRR的影响。比较两组患者治疗前后的变量(如基线特征、血清甲状腺球蛋白[Tg]水平、住院时间、治疗费用、无复发生存期和并发症发生率)。结果:每次随访时,消融后的最大直径和体积均小于消融前(p p > 0.05)。不同消融功率下最大直径、体积、VRR差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。各组平均血清Tg水平及生化缓解率差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。与再次手术相比,MWA住院时间短,治疗费用低(p p p > 0.05)。两组无复发生存率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.401)。两组间的1年和3年无复发生存率具有可比性。结论:对于特定的PTC患者,MWA可能是一种安全有效的替代重复手术治疗mln的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信