Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validity of the Brazilian version of the Cognitive Function Instrument.

Q3 Medicine
Adalberto Studart-Neto, Natália Cristina Moraes, Raphael Ribeiro Spera, Silvia Stahl Merlin, Jacy Bezerra Parmera, Omar Jaluul, Mônica SanchesYassuda, Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki, Ricardo Nitrini
{"title":"Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validity of the Brazilian version of the Cognitive Function Instrument.","authors":"Adalberto Studart-Neto,&nbsp;Natália Cristina Moraes,&nbsp;Raphael Ribeiro Spera,&nbsp;Silvia Stahl Merlin,&nbsp;Jacy Bezerra Parmera,&nbsp;Omar Jaluul,&nbsp;Mônica SanchesYassuda,&nbsp;Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki,&nbsp;Ricardo Nitrini","doi":"10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2021-0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is defined as a self-perception of a progressive cognitive impairment, which is not detected objectively through neuropsychological tests. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study developed the Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI) to evaluate individuals with SCD. The CFI consists of two versions, namely, a self-report and a partner report.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to translate CFI into Brazilian Portuguese, perform a cross-cultural adaptation, and validate the Brazilian version.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The translation and transcultural adaptation process consisted of six stages, and the preliminary version was answered by a sample of individuals recruited among the patients' caregivers from a cognitive neurology outpatient clinic. Finally, the final Brazilian version of the CFI was applied to a sample of nondemented older adults to validate the instrument, which was divided into with and without SCD, according to the answer \"<i>yes</i>\" for the question: \"<i>Do you feel like your memory is becoming worse?</i>\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final version of CFI showed a high level of acceptability as an assessment tool in nondemented older adults. Participants with SCD had higher scores in the CFI self-report compared with those without complaints. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve of the CFI self-report was 0.865 (95% confidence interval 0.779-0.951), and the cutoff score of 2.0 was the one that best distinguished the SCD group from the control group, with a sensitivity of 73.3% and a specificity of 81.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CFI proved to be an instrument with good accuracy and easy applicability to identify older adults with SCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":39167,"journal":{"name":"Dementia e Neuropsychologia","volume":" ","pages":"79-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia e Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2021-0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is defined as a self-perception of a progressive cognitive impairment, which is not detected objectively through neuropsychological tests. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study developed the Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI) to evaluate individuals with SCD. The CFI consists of two versions, namely, a self-report and a partner report.

Objective: This study aimed to translate CFI into Brazilian Portuguese, perform a cross-cultural adaptation, and validate the Brazilian version.

Methods: The translation and transcultural adaptation process consisted of six stages, and the preliminary version was answered by a sample of individuals recruited among the patients' caregivers from a cognitive neurology outpatient clinic. Finally, the final Brazilian version of the CFI was applied to a sample of nondemented older adults to validate the instrument, which was divided into with and without SCD, according to the answer "yes" for the question: "Do you feel like your memory is becoming worse?".

Results: The final version of CFI showed a high level of acceptability as an assessment tool in nondemented older adults. Participants with SCD had higher scores in the CFI self-report compared with those without complaints. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve of the CFI self-report was 0.865 (95% confidence interval 0.779-0.951), and the cutoff score of 2.0 was the one that best distinguished the SCD group from the control group, with a sensitivity of 73.3% and a specificity of 81.5%.

Conclusions: CFI proved to be an instrument with good accuracy and easy applicability to identify older adults with SCD.

翻译、跨文化适应和巴西版认知功能工具的有效性。
主观认知衰退(SCD)被定义为一种自我感知的进行性认知障碍,不能通过神经心理学测试客观地检测出来。阿尔茨海默病合作研究开发了认知功能工具(CFI)来评估SCD患者。CFI包括两个版本,即自我报告和伙伴报告。目的:本研究旨在将CFI翻译成巴西葡萄牙语,进行跨文化改编,并验证巴西版本。方法:翻译和跨文化适应过程包括六个阶段,初步版本由从认知神经病学门诊的患者护理人员中招募的个体样本回答。最后,最终的巴西版本的CFI应用于一个非痴呆的老年人样本来验证仪器,根据对问题的回答“是”,将其分为有和没有SCD的两组:“你是否觉得你的记忆力正在变差?”结果:CFI的最终版本显示出高度的可接受性,作为一种评估工具,在无痴呆的老年人中。与没有抱怨的参与者相比,患有SCD的参与者在CFI自我报告中得分更高。在受试者工作特征曲线分析中,CFI自我报告曲线下面积为0.865(95%可信区间0.779 ~ 0.951),截断值为2.0是区分SCD组与对照组的最佳指标,敏感性为73.3%,特异性为81.5%。结论:CFI诊断老年人SCD具有较好的准确性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dementia e Neuropsychologia
Dementia e Neuropsychologia Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dementia top Neuropsychologia the official scientific journal of the Cognitive Neurology and Ageing Department of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology and of the Brazilian Association of Geriatric Neuropsychiatry, is published by the "Associação Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento", a nonprofit Brazilian association. Regularly published on March, June, September, and December since 2007.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信