OSDI Outcomes Based on Patient Demographic and Wear Patterns in Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem.

IF 1.4 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Clinical Optometry Pub Date : 2022-01-10 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTO.S337920
Bita Asghari, Daniel Brocks, Karen G Carrasquillo, Estelle Crowley
{"title":"OSDI Outcomes Based on Patient Demographic and Wear Patterns in Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem.","authors":"Bita Asghari,&nbsp;Daniel Brocks,&nbsp;Karen G Carrasquillo,&nbsp;Estelle Crowley","doi":"10.2147/OPTO.S337920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem (BostonSight PROSE) treatment on symptom outcomes based on the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who initiated PROSE treatment between September 2017 and December 2019 by the same clinician. The primary outcome measure was to compare OSDI survey scores at baseline prior to PROSE treatment and at follow-up, after PROSE treatment. Indication for treatment, sex, age, device diameter, average wear time, preexisting mental illness, duration of PROSE wear, and status of PROSE wear at follow-up were also studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 134 patients underwent PROSE treatment and completed a baseline OSDI survey during the study period. Forty-three patients completed a follow-up OSDI survey and were included in the study analysis. The most common treatment indications were keratoconjunctivitis sicca (n=27) and corneal ectasia (n=16). Baseline average OSDI score was 56.9±23.7 for the 43 subjects who completed a subsequent OSDI survey. The last documented average follow-up OSDI for those 43 subjects was 23.8±15.6, median (IQR) of 22.9 (10.4 to 32.3), and a statistically significant 54.7±27.6% average improvement from baseline (<i>p</i><0.01). All patients, except for two, showed improvement in OSDI score. Statistically significant improvement occurred regardless of underlying diagnosis with no statistically significant difference based on age, sex, mental illness, or device diameter and no statistical correlation with average wear time, or duration of PROSE wear.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PROSE treatment improves visual function and symptom relief as demonstrated by the OSDI survey. Sex, age, preexisting mental illness, device diameter, average wear time, and duration of wear had no statistically significant impact on OSDI outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":43701,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Optometry","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/17/df/opto-14-1.PMC8760101.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S337920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem (BostonSight PROSE) treatment on symptom outcomes based on the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI).

Patients and methods: This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who initiated PROSE treatment between September 2017 and December 2019 by the same clinician. The primary outcome measure was to compare OSDI survey scores at baseline prior to PROSE treatment and at follow-up, after PROSE treatment. Indication for treatment, sex, age, device diameter, average wear time, preexisting mental illness, duration of PROSE wear, and status of PROSE wear at follow-up were also studied.

Results: A total of 134 patients underwent PROSE treatment and completed a baseline OSDI survey during the study period. Forty-three patients completed a follow-up OSDI survey and were included in the study analysis. The most common treatment indications were keratoconjunctivitis sicca (n=27) and corneal ectasia (n=16). Baseline average OSDI score was 56.9±23.7 for the 43 subjects who completed a subsequent OSDI survey. The last documented average follow-up OSDI for those 43 subjects was 23.8±15.6, median (IQR) of 22.9 (10.4 to 32.3), and a statistically significant 54.7±27.6% average improvement from baseline (p<0.01). All patients, except for two, showed improvement in OSDI score. Statistically significant improvement occurred regardless of underlying diagnosis with no statistically significant difference based on age, sex, mental illness, or device diameter and no statistical correlation with average wear time, or duration of PROSE wear.

Conclusion: PROSE treatment improves visual function and symptom relief as demonstrated by the OSDI survey. Sex, age, preexisting mental illness, device diameter, average wear time, and duration of wear had no statistically significant impact on OSDI outcomes.

Abstract Image

眼表生态系统假体置换术中基于患者人口统计学和磨损模式的OSDI结果。
目的:基于眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评价眼表生态系统假体置换术(BostonSight PROSE)治疗对症状结局的影响。患者和方法:这是一项单中心回顾性分析,纳入了2017年9月至2019年12月期间由同一临床医生接受PROSE治疗的连续患者。主要结局指标是比较PROSE治疗前和治疗后随访时的OSDI调查得分。治疗适应证、性别、年龄、器械直径、平均佩戴时间、既往存在的精神疾病、散文佩戴时间、随访时散文佩戴状况也进行了研究。结果:在研究期间,共有134例患者接受了PROSE治疗,并完成了基线OSDI调查。43例患者完成了OSDI随访调查,并纳入研究分析。最常见的治疗指征是干枯性角膜结膜炎(27例)和角膜扩张(16例)。43名完成后续OSDI调查的受试者基线平均OSDI评分为56.9±23.7。最后一次记录的43名受试者的平均随访OSDI为23.8±15.6,中位(IQR)为22.9(10.4至32.3),与基线相比,平均改善了54.7±27.6%,具有统计学意义(p结论:OSDI调查显示,PROSE治疗改善了视觉功能和症状缓解。性别、年龄、先前存在的精神疾病、器械直径、平均佩戴时间和佩戴持续时间对OSDI结果没有统计学上显著的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Optometry
Clinical Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Optometry is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on clinical optometry. All aspects of patient care are addressed within the journal as well as the practice of optometry including economic and business analyses. Basic and clinical research papers are published that cover all aspects of optics, refraction and its application to the theory and practice of optometry. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Theoretical and applied optics, Delivery of patient care in optometry practice, Refraction and correction of errors, Screening and preventative aspects of eye disease, Extended clinical roles for optometrists including shared care and provision of medications, Teaching and training optometrists, International aspects of optometry, Business practice, Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction, Health economic evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信