Pleasure, womanhood and the desire for reconstructive surgery after female genital cutting in Belgium.

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Anthropology & Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-29 DOI:10.1080/13648470.2021.1994332
Sarah O'Neill, Fabienne Richard, Cendrine Vanderhoven, Martin Caillet
{"title":"Pleasure, womanhood and the desire for reconstructive surgery after female genital cutting in Belgium.","authors":"Sarah O'Neill,&nbsp;Fabienne Richard,&nbsp;Cendrine Vanderhoven,&nbsp;Martin Caillet","doi":"10.1080/13648470.2021.1994332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Growing numbers of women are showing interest in clitoral reconstructive surgery after 'Female Genital Mutilation'. The safety and success of reconstructive surgery, however, has not clearly been established and due to lack of evidence the World Health Organization does not recommend it. Based on anthropological research among patients who requested surgery at the Brussels specialist clinic between 2017 and 2020, this paper looks at two cases of women who actually enjoy sex and experience pleasure but request the procedure to become 'whole again' after stigmatising experiences with health-care professionals, sexual partners or gossip among African migrant communities. An ethnographic approach was used including indepth interviews and participant observation during reception appointments, gynecological consultations, sexology and psychotherapy sessions. Despite limited evidence on the safety of the surgical intervention, surgery is often perceived as the ultimate remedy for the 'missing' clitoris. Such beliefs are nourished by predominant discourses of cut women as 'sexually mutilated'. Following Butler, this article elicits how discursive practices on the physiological sex of a woman can shape her gender identity as a complete or incomplete person. We also examine what it was that changed the patients' mind about the surgery in the process of re-building their confidence through sexology therapy and psychotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8240,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology & Medicine","volume":"29 3","pages":"237-254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2021.1994332","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Growing numbers of women are showing interest in clitoral reconstructive surgery after 'Female Genital Mutilation'. The safety and success of reconstructive surgery, however, has not clearly been established and due to lack of evidence the World Health Organization does not recommend it. Based on anthropological research among patients who requested surgery at the Brussels specialist clinic between 2017 and 2020, this paper looks at two cases of women who actually enjoy sex and experience pleasure but request the procedure to become 'whole again' after stigmatising experiences with health-care professionals, sexual partners or gossip among African migrant communities. An ethnographic approach was used including indepth interviews and participant observation during reception appointments, gynecological consultations, sexology and psychotherapy sessions. Despite limited evidence on the safety of the surgical intervention, surgery is often perceived as the ultimate remedy for the 'missing' clitoris. Such beliefs are nourished by predominant discourses of cut women as 'sexually mutilated'. Following Butler, this article elicits how discursive practices on the physiological sex of a woman can shape her gender identity as a complete or incomplete person. We also examine what it was that changed the patients' mind about the surgery in the process of re-building their confidence through sexology therapy and psychotherapy.

比利时女性生殖器切割后的愉悦、女性气质和对重建手术的渴望。
越来越多的妇女在“女性生殖器切割”后对阴蒂重建手术表现出兴趣。然而,重建手术的安全性和成功性尚未明确确定,由于缺乏证据,世界卫生组织不建议这样做。基于对2017年至2020年期间在布鲁塞尔专科诊所要求进行手术的患者的人类学研究,本文研究了两例女性,她们实际上享受性并体验快乐,但在被医疗保健专业人员、性伴侣或非洲移民社区的流言蜚语所污名化的经历后,要求进行手术以“再次完整”。采用人种学方法,包括在接待预约、妇科咨询、性学和心理治疗期间进行深度访谈和参与者观察。尽管关于手术干预安全性的证据有限,但手术通常被认为是“缺失”阴蒂的最终补救措施。这样的信念是由被切割的女性作为“性残障”的主流话语滋养的。这篇文章跟随Butler,引出了关于女性生理性别的话语实践如何塑造她作为一个完整或不完整的人的性别认同。我们还研究了是什么改变了患者对手术的想法,在通过性学治疗和心理治疗重建信心的过程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信