Color Discrimination Provides Insight into the Relationship between Personality Cognition and Brain Morphology in the Western Mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis).

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Brain Behavior and Evolution Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-21 DOI:10.1159/000522483
Mengyu Liu, Yanqiu Liu, He Wang, Jia Jia, Kai Liu
{"title":"Color Discrimination Provides Insight into the Relationship between Personality Cognition and Brain Morphology in the Western Mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis).","authors":"Mengyu Liu,&nbsp;Yanqiu Liu,&nbsp;He Wang,&nbsp;Jia Jia,&nbsp;Kai Liu","doi":"10.1159/000522483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies on the differences in cognitive ability between individuals focused on two aspects: one is whether the individual differences in cognitive ability are related to brain size, the other is whether they pertain to certain personality traits. To explore these two hypotheses, we tested the personality traits, cognitive abilities, and brain volumes of western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). First, a color preference test was conducted to select two unbiased colors for G. affinis for subsequent cognitive tests. The results showed that G. affinis had a great preference for red and green to yellow and blue; therefore, the red-green combination was selected for the study of cognitive abilities. Then, we explored the relationship among cognition, personality, and brain morphology through cognitive abilities tests, personality traits, and brain volume measurements. We found that there was a trade-off among cognition, personality, and brain morphology. For example, more active individuals found food faster, but had also poor memory; Those individuals with larger corpus cerebelli were bolder while they were less likely to find food; The individuals that found food faster were more active and had a smaller inferior lobe. The color preference test provides a reliable way for selecting unbiased colors for behavioral studies in G. affinis. Meanwhile, our study indicates that there exists a balance mechanism among cognition, personality, and brain morphology.</p>","PeriodicalId":56328,"journal":{"name":"Brain Behavior and Evolution","volume":"97 5","pages":"274-283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Behavior and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000522483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recent studies on the differences in cognitive ability between individuals focused on two aspects: one is whether the individual differences in cognitive ability are related to brain size, the other is whether they pertain to certain personality traits. To explore these two hypotheses, we tested the personality traits, cognitive abilities, and brain volumes of western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). First, a color preference test was conducted to select two unbiased colors for G. affinis for subsequent cognitive tests. The results showed that G. affinis had a great preference for red and green to yellow and blue; therefore, the red-green combination was selected for the study of cognitive abilities. Then, we explored the relationship among cognition, personality, and brain morphology through cognitive abilities tests, personality traits, and brain volume measurements. We found that there was a trade-off among cognition, personality, and brain morphology. For example, more active individuals found food faster, but had also poor memory; Those individuals with larger corpus cerebelli were bolder while they were less likely to find food; The individuals that found food faster were more active and had a smaller inferior lobe. The color preference test provides a reliable way for selecting unbiased colors for behavioral studies in G. affinis. Meanwhile, our study indicates that there exists a balance mechanism among cognition, personality, and brain morphology.

色彩辨别为西蚊鱼人格认知与脑形态的关系提供了新的视角。
最近关于个体认知能力差异的研究主要集中在两个方面:一是个体认知能力差异是否与大脑大小有关,二是个体认知能力差异是否与某些人格特质有关。为了探索这两种假设,我们测试了西食蚊鱼(Gambusia affinis)的人格特征、认知能力和脑容量。首先,进行颜色偏好测试,为随后的认知测试选择两种无偏色。结果表明:与黄、蓝相比,黄、蓝对红、绿有较大的偏好;因此,我们选择红绿组合进行认知能力的研究。然后,我们通过认知能力测试、人格特征和脑容量测量来探讨认知、人格和脑形态之间的关系。我们发现认知、个性和大脑形态之间存在着一种权衡关系。例如,更活跃的人找到食物的速度更快,但记忆力也较差;那些小脑体较大的个体更勇敢,但它们不太可能找到食物;更快找到食物的人更活跃,下叶也更小。颜色偏好试验为选择无偏色进行类人猿行为研究提供了一种可靠的方法。同时,我们的研究表明认知、人格和脑形态之间存在着一种平衡机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Behavior and Evolution
Brain Behavior and Evolution 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
23.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Brain, Behavior and Evolution'' is a journal with a loyal following, high standards, and a unique profile as the main outlet for the continuing scientific discourse on nervous system evolution. The journal publishes comparative neurobiological studies that focus on nervous system structure, function, or development in vertebrates as well as invertebrates. Approaches range from the molecular over the anatomical and physiological to the behavioral. Despite this diversity, most papers published in ''Brain, Behavior and Evolution'' include an evolutionary angle, at least in the discussion, and focus on neural mechanisms or phenomena. Some purely behavioral research may be within the journal’s scope, but the suitability of such manuscripts will be assessed on a case-by-case basis. The journal also publishes review articles that provide critical overviews of current topics in evolutionary neurobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信