Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth.

IF 3 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS

International Journal of Biomaterials Pub Date : 2022-02-11 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/6643825

Jusuf Lukarcanin, İsmail Serhat Sadıkoğlu, Bilal Yaşa, Lezize Şebnem Türkün, Murat Türkün

{"title":"Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth.","authors":"Jusuf Lukarcanin, İsmail Serhat Sadıkoğlu, Bilal Yaşa, Lezize Şebnem Türkün, Murat Türkün","doi":"10.1155/2022/6643825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study is to evaluate the physical properties of endodontically treated teeth restored with five different restorative techniques and materials. Hundred and forty extracted human molar teeth were used. In addition to five restoration groups, specimens with no restorations were used as the negative control, and intact molar teeth were used as the positive control. For flexural strength tests, material specimens were made from 5 different materials using a mould according to ISO 4049 standards. One-way ANOVA revealed that the fracture resistance was significantly affected by the restoration type. SFRC group showed the best fracture resistance values, while lowest values were seen in the GWF group. The test results of flexural strength showed values between 140 and 184 MPa and modulus of elasticity between 6.33 and 18.89 GPa (p < 0.05). Under the limits of this study, results showed that SFRC can be used to increase the fracture resistance of ETT.","PeriodicalId":13704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomaterials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8856822/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6643825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the physical properties of endodontically treated teeth restored with five different restorative techniques and materials. Hundred and forty extracted human molar teeth were used. In addition to five restoration groups, specimens with no restorations were used as the negative control, and intact molar teeth were used as the positive control. For flexural strength tests, material specimens were made from 5 different materials using a mould according to ISO 4049 standards. One-way ANOVA revealed that the fracture resistance was significantly affected by the restoration type. SFRC group showed the best fracture resistance values, while lowest values were seen in the GWF group. The test results of flexural strength showed values between 140 and 184 MPa and modulus of elasticity between 6.33 and 18.89 GPa (p < 0.05). Under the limits of this study, results showed that SFRC can be used to increase the fracture resistance of ETT.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

牙髓治疗后不同修复技术的比较。

本研究的目的是评估五种不同的修复技术和材料修复的根管治疗后的牙齿的物理特性。使用了140颗拔除的人类臼齿。除5个修复组外，将未修复标本作为阴性对照，将完整磨牙作为阳性对照。对于抗弯强度测试，材料样品由5种不同的材料根据ISO 4049标准使用模具制作。单因素方差分析显示，骨折阻力受修复类型的影响显著。SFRC组骨折耐受力最佳，GWF组骨折耐受力最低。抗折强度测试结果为140 ~ 184 MPa，弹性模量测试结果为6.33 ~ 18.89 GPa (p < 0.05)。在本研究的限制下，结果表明SFRC可以用来增加ETT的抗断裂能力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Biomaterials MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

3.20%

发文量

审稿时长

21 weeks