General cognitive ability assessment in the German National Cohort (NAKO) - The block-adaptive number series task.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Florian Schmiedek, Ulf Kroehne, Frank Goldhammer, John J Prindle, Ulman Lindenberger, Johanna Klinger-König, Hans J Grabe, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Alexander Pabst, Fabian Streit, Lea Zillich, Luca Kleineidam, Michael Wagner, Marcella Rietschel, Dan Rujescu, Börge Schmidt, Nako Investigators, Klaus Berger
{"title":"General cognitive ability assessment in the German National Cohort (NAKO) - The block-adaptive number series task.","authors":"Florian Schmiedek, Ulf Kroehne, Frank Goldhammer, John J Prindle, Ulman Lindenberger, Johanna Klinger-König, Hans J Grabe, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Alexander Pabst, Fabian Streit, Lea Zillich, Luca Kleineidam, Michael Wagner, Marcella Rietschel, Dan Rujescu, Börge Schmidt, Nako Investigators, Klaus Berger","doi":"10.1080/15622975.2021.2011407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives.</b> Evaluate the block-adaptive number series task of reasoning, as a time-efficient proxy of general cognitive ability in the Level-2 sample of the German National Cohort (NAKO), a population-based mega cohort.<b>Methods.</b> The number series task consisted of two blocks of three items each, administered as part of the touchscreen-based assessment. Based on performance on the first three items, a second block of appropriate difficulty was automatically administered. Scoring of performance was based on the Rasch model. Relations of performance scores to age, sex, education, study centre, language proficiency, and scores on other cognitive tasks were examined.<b>Results.</b> Except for one very difficult item, the data of the remaining 14 items showed sufficient fit to the Rasch model (Infit: 0.89-1.04; Outfit: 0.80-1.08). The resulting performance scores (<i>N</i> = 21,056) had a distribution that was truncated at very high levels of ability. The reliability of the performance estimates was satisfactory. Relations to age, sex, education, and the executive function factor of the other cognitive tasks in the NAKO supported the validity.<b>Conclusions.</b> The number series task provides a valid proxy of general cognitive ability for the Level-2 sample of the NAKO, based on a highly time-efficient assessment procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":49358,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"924-935"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2021.2011407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. Evaluate the block-adaptive number series task of reasoning, as a time-efficient proxy of general cognitive ability in the Level-2 sample of the German National Cohort (NAKO), a population-based mega cohort.Methods. The number series task consisted of two blocks of three items each, administered as part of the touchscreen-based assessment. Based on performance on the first three items, a second block of appropriate difficulty was automatically administered. Scoring of performance was based on the Rasch model. Relations of performance scores to age, sex, education, study centre, language proficiency, and scores on other cognitive tasks were examined.Results. Except for one very difficult item, the data of the remaining 14 items showed sufficient fit to the Rasch model (Infit: 0.89-1.04; Outfit: 0.80-1.08). The resulting performance scores (N = 21,056) had a distribution that was truncated at very high levels of ability. The reliability of the performance estimates was satisfactory. Relations to age, sex, education, and the executive function factor of the other cognitive tasks in the NAKO supported the validity.Conclusions. The number series task provides a valid proxy of general cognitive ability for the Level-2 sample of the NAKO, based on a highly time-efficient assessment procedure.

一般认知能力评估在德国国家队列(NAKO) -块自适应数字序列任务。
目标。评估推理的块自适应数列任务,作为德国国家队列(NAKO)的二级样本中一般认知能力的时间效率代理,这是一个基于人口的大型队列。数字系列任务由两个模块组成,每个模块三个项目,作为基于触摸屏的评估的一部分进行管理。基于前三个项目的表现,第二块适当的难度被自动管理。性能评分基于Rasch模型。考察了表现得分与年龄、性别、教育程度、学习中心、语言能力和其他认知任务得分的关系。除1项难度较大外,其余14项数据均符合Rasch模型(Infit: 0.89-1.04;装:0.80 - -1.08)。结果的表现分数(N = 21,056)的分布在非常高的能力水平上被截断。业绩估计的可靠性令人满意。NAKO中其他认知任务与年龄、性别、教育程度和执行功能因素的关系支持了效度。数字序列任务提供了一个有效的代理一般认知能力的二级样本的NAKO,基于一个高度高效的评估程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is to increase the worldwide communication of knowledge in clinical and basic research on biological psychiatry. Its target audience is thus clinical psychiatrists, educators, scientists and students interested in biological psychiatry. The composition of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry , with its diverse categories that allow communication of a great variety of information, ensures that it is of interest to a wide range of readers. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is a major clinically oriented journal on biological psychiatry. The opportunity to educate (through critical review papers, treatment guidelines and consensus reports), publish original work and observations (original papers and brief reports) and to express personal opinions (Letters to the Editor) makes The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry an extremely important medium in the field of biological psychiatry all over the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信