The North American opioid epidemic: opportunities and challenges for clinical laboratories.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Sarah R Delaney, Danyel H Tacker, Christine L H Snozek
{"title":"The North American opioid epidemic: opportunities and challenges for clinical laboratories.","authors":"Sarah R Delaney,&nbsp;Danyel H Tacker,&nbsp;Christine L H Snozek","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2022.2037122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 1999, the opioid epidemic in North America has resulted in over 1 million deaths, and it continues to escalate despite numerous efforts in various arenas to combat the upward trend. Clinical laboratories provide drug testing to support practices such as emergency medicine, substance use disorder treatment, and pain management; increasingly, these laboratories are collaborating in novel partnerships including drug-checking services (DCS) and multidisciplinary treatment teams. This review examines drug testing related to management of licit and illicit opioid use, new technologies and test strategies employed by clinical laboratories, barriers hindering laboratory response to the opioid epidemic, and areas for improvement and standardization within drug testing. Literature search terms included combinations of \"opioid,\" \"opiate,\" \"fentanyl,\" \"laboratory,\" \"epidemic,\" \"crisis,\" \"mass spectrometry,\" \"immunoassay,\" \"drug screen,\" \"drug test,\" \"guidelines,\" plus review of PubMed \"similar articles\" and references within publications. While immunoassay (IA) and point-of-care (POC) test options for synthetic opioids are increasingly available, mass spectrometry (MS) platforms offer the greatest flexibility and sensitivity for detecting novel, potent opioids. Previously reserved as a second-tier application in most drug test algorithms, MS assays are gaining a larger role in initial screening for specific patients and DCS. However, there are substantial differences among laboratories in terms of updating test menus, algorithms, and technologies to meet changing clinical needs. While some clinical laboratories lack the resources and expertise to implement MS, many are also slow to adopt available IA and POC tests for newer opioids such as fentanyl. MS-based testing also presents challenges, including gaps in available guidance for assay validation and ongoing performance assessment that contribute to a dramatic lack of standardization among laboratories. We identify opportunities for improvement in laboratory operations, reporting, and interpretation of drug test results, including laboratorian and provider education and laboratory-focused guidelines. We also highlight the need for collaboration with providers, assay and instrument manufacturers, and national organizations to increase the effectiveness of clinical laboratory and provider efforts in preventing morbidity and mortality associated with opioid use and misuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":"59 5","pages":"309-331"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2022.2037122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Since 1999, the opioid epidemic in North America has resulted in over 1 million deaths, and it continues to escalate despite numerous efforts in various arenas to combat the upward trend. Clinical laboratories provide drug testing to support practices such as emergency medicine, substance use disorder treatment, and pain management; increasingly, these laboratories are collaborating in novel partnerships including drug-checking services (DCS) and multidisciplinary treatment teams. This review examines drug testing related to management of licit and illicit opioid use, new technologies and test strategies employed by clinical laboratories, barriers hindering laboratory response to the opioid epidemic, and areas for improvement and standardization within drug testing. Literature search terms included combinations of "opioid," "opiate," "fentanyl," "laboratory," "epidemic," "crisis," "mass spectrometry," "immunoassay," "drug screen," "drug test," "guidelines," plus review of PubMed "similar articles" and references within publications. While immunoassay (IA) and point-of-care (POC) test options for synthetic opioids are increasingly available, mass spectrometry (MS) platforms offer the greatest flexibility and sensitivity for detecting novel, potent opioids. Previously reserved as a second-tier application in most drug test algorithms, MS assays are gaining a larger role in initial screening for specific patients and DCS. However, there are substantial differences among laboratories in terms of updating test menus, algorithms, and technologies to meet changing clinical needs. While some clinical laboratories lack the resources and expertise to implement MS, many are also slow to adopt available IA and POC tests for newer opioids such as fentanyl. MS-based testing also presents challenges, including gaps in available guidance for assay validation and ongoing performance assessment that contribute to a dramatic lack of standardization among laboratories. We identify opportunities for improvement in laboratory operations, reporting, and interpretation of drug test results, including laboratorian and provider education and laboratory-focused guidelines. We also highlight the need for collaboration with providers, assay and instrument manufacturers, and national organizations to increase the effectiveness of clinical laboratory and provider efforts in preventing morbidity and mortality associated with opioid use and misuse.

北美阿片类药物流行:临床实验室的机遇和挑战。
自1999年以来,北美的类阿片流行病已造成100多万人死亡,尽管在各个领域为遏制上升趋势作出了许多努力,但这种流行病仍在继续升级。临床实验室提供药物测试,以支持急诊医学、物质使用障碍治疗和疼痛管理等实践;这些实验室越来越多地以新型伙伴关系进行合作,包括药物检查服务和多学科治疗小组。本综述审查了与管理合法和非法阿片类药物使用有关的药物测试、临床实验室采用的新技术和测试策略、阻碍实验室应对阿片类药物流行的障碍,以及药物测试中有待改进和标准化的领域。文献搜索词包括“阿片类药物”、“阿片类药物”、“芬太尼”、“实验室”、“流行病”、“危机”、“质谱分析”、“免疫分析”、“药物筛选”、“药物测试”、“指南”的组合,以及PubMed“类似文章”的评论和出版物中的参考文献。虽然合成阿片类药物的免疫测定(IA)和即时检测(POC)方法越来越多,但质谱(MS)平台为检测新型强效阿片类药物提供了最大的灵活性和灵敏度。在大多数药物测试算法中,质谱分析以前被保留为第二级应用,在特定患者和DCS的初始筛选中,质谱分析正在发挥更大的作用。然而,在更新测试菜单、算法和技术以满足不断变化的临床需求方面,实验室之间存在实质性差异。虽然一些临床实验室缺乏实施MS的资源和专业知识,但许多实验室对芬太尼等新型阿片类药物采用现有的IA和POC测试的速度也很慢。基于质谱的检测也带来了挑战,包括现有的分析验证指南和正在进行的性能评估存在差距,这导致实验室之间严重缺乏标准化。我们确定在实验室操作、报告和药物检测结果解释方面的改进机会,包括实验室人员和提供者教育以及以实验室为重点的指南。我们还强调需要与提供者、测定和仪器制造商以及国家组织合作,以提高临床实验室和提供者在预防与阿片类药物使用和滥用相关的发病率和死亡率方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信