Association of dietary acid load with metabolic syndrome in overweight and obese women.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Hadith Tangestani, Hadi Emamat, Atefeh Tavakoli, Hamid Ghalandari, Seyed Ali Keshavarz, Mir Saeed Yekaninejad, Khadijeh Mirzaei
{"title":"Association of dietary acid load with metabolic syndrome in overweight and obese women.","authors":"Hadith Tangestani,&nbsp;Hadi Emamat,&nbsp;Atefeh Tavakoli,&nbsp;Hamid Ghalandari,&nbsp;Seyed Ali Keshavarz,&nbsp;Mir Saeed Yekaninejad,&nbsp;Khadijeh Mirzaei","doi":"10.1024/0300-9831/a000748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> There is increasing evidence supporting the association between dietary acid load and metabolic syndrome (MetS) components. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are rare and inconsistent studies to examine the association of dietary acid load and MetS score. The aim of this research was to assess dietary acid loads as measured by potential renal acid load (PRAL) in relation to MetS. <i>Methods:</i> The current study involved 246 overweight or obese women. Dietary assessment was performed using a validated 147-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Remer's equation was used to calculate PRAL score. MetS was defined as the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)/Adult Treatment Panel ΙΙΙ (ATP). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to find the association between PRAL score and MetS. <i>Results:</i> The mean age and BMI of participants were 36.49±8.38 years old and 31.04±4.31 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Overall, 32 percent of participants had MetS. According to the final model, although not statistically significant, there was a trend which suggested that being in the highest quartile of adherence to dietary acid load, evaluated by PRAL score, compared to the lowest quartile was associated with higher odds of MetS [(OR: 2.80; 95% CI: 0.95-8.26), (P=0.06)]. <i>Conclusions:</i> Our study shows a borderline non-significant association between PRAL and odds of MetS in overweight or obese women. However, definitive clarification of this relationship requires future intervention studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13884,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0300-9831/a000748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: There is increasing evidence supporting the association between dietary acid load and metabolic syndrome (MetS) components. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are rare and inconsistent studies to examine the association of dietary acid load and MetS score. The aim of this research was to assess dietary acid loads as measured by potential renal acid load (PRAL) in relation to MetS. Methods: The current study involved 246 overweight or obese women. Dietary assessment was performed using a validated 147-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Remer's equation was used to calculate PRAL score. MetS was defined as the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)/Adult Treatment Panel ΙΙΙ (ATP). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to find the association between PRAL score and MetS. Results: The mean age and BMI of participants were 36.49±8.38 years old and 31.04±4.31 kg/m2, respectively. Overall, 32 percent of participants had MetS. According to the final model, although not statistically significant, there was a trend which suggested that being in the highest quartile of adherence to dietary acid load, evaluated by PRAL score, compared to the lowest quartile was associated with higher odds of MetS [(OR: 2.80; 95% CI: 0.95-8.26), (P=0.06)]. Conclusions: Our study shows a borderline non-significant association between PRAL and odds of MetS in overweight or obese women. However, definitive clarification of this relationship requires future intervention studies.

超重和肥胖妇女饮食酸负荷与代谢综合征的关系。
背景:越来越多的证据支持饮食酸负荷与代谢综合征(MetS)成分之间的相关性。然而,据我们所知,很少有不一致的研究来检验饮食酸负荷和代谢综合征评分之间的关系。本研究的目的是通过潜在肾酸负荷(PRAL)与代谢综合征的关系来评估饮食酸负荷。方法:目前的研究涉及246名超重或肥胖的女性。使用经验证的147项食物频率问卷(FFQ)进行饮食评估。采用Remer方程计算PRAL评分。MetS被定义为国家胆固醇教育计划(NCEP)/成人治疗小组(ATP)。多变量逻辑回归模型用于发现PRAL评分与MetS之间的相关性。结果:参与者的平均年龄和BMI分别为36.49±8.38岁和31.04±4.31 kg/m2。总体而言,32%的参与者患有代谢综合征。根据最终的模型,尽管没有统计学意义,但有一种趋势表明,在PRAL评分评估的饮食酸负荷依从性最高的四分位数中,与最低四分位数相比,患MetS的几率更高[(OR:2.80;95%CI:0.95-8.26),(P=0.06)]。结论:我们的研究表明,超重或肥胖女性的PRAL与患MetS几率之间存在临界非显著关联。然而,这种关系的明确澄清需要未来的干预研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since 1930 this journal has provided an important international forum for scientific advances in the study of nutrition and vitamins. Widely read by academicians as well as scientists working in major governmental and corporate laboratories throughout the world, this publication presents work dealing with basic as well as applied topics in the field of micronutrients, macronutrients, and non-nutrients such as secondary plant compounds. The editorial and advisory boards include many of the leading persons currently working in this area. The journal is of particular interest to: - Nutritionists - Vitaminologists - Biochemists - Physicians - Engineers of human and animal nutrition - Food scientists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信