Motor speech impairment predicts expressive language in minimally verbal, but not low verbal, individuals with autism spectrum disorder.

IF 3.4 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Karen Chenausky, Amanda Brignell, Angela Morgan, Helen Tager-Flusberg
{"title":"Motor speech impairment predicts expressive language in minimally verbal, but not low verbal, individuals with autism spectrum disorder.","authors":"Karen Chenausky,&nbsp;Amanda Brignell,&nbsp;Angela Morgan,&nbsp;Helen Tager-Flusberg","doi":"10.1177/2396941519856333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Developmental motor speech impairment has been suspected, but rarely systematically examined, in low- and minimally verbal individuals with autism spectrum disorder. We aimed to investigate the extent of motor speech impairment in this population and its relation to number of different words produced during a semi-structured language sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Videos of 54 low-verbal and minimally verbal individuals (ages 4;4-18;10) performing portions of a speech praxis test were coded for signs of motor speech impairment (e.g., childhood apraxia of speech). Age, autism spectrum disorder severity, nonspeech oral-motor ability, speech production ability, nonverbal IQ, and receptive vocabulary were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four groups emerged: (1) speech within normal limits (<i>n</i>=12), (2) non-childhood apraxia of speech impairment (<i>n</i>=16), (3) suspected childhood apraxia of speech (<i>n</i>=13), and (4) insufficient speech to rate (<i>n</i>=13). Groups differed significantly in nonspeech oral-motor ability, speech production ability, nonverbal IQ, and receptive vocabulary. Overall, only speech production ability and receptive vocabulary accounted for significant variance in number of different words. Receptive vocabulary significantly predicted number of different words only in Groups 1 and 2, while speech production ability significantly predicted number of different words only in Groups 3 and 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>If replicated, our findings have important implications for developing much-needed spoken language interventions in minimally verbal individuals with autism spectrum disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":36716,"journal":{"name":"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments","volume":"4 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2396941519856333","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941519856333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Background and aims: Developmental motor speech impairment has been suspected, but rarely systematically examined, in low- and minimally verbal individuals with autism spectrum disorder. We aimed to investigate the extent of motor speech impairment in this population and its relation to number of different words produced during a semi-structured language sample.

Methods: Videos of 54 low-verbal and minimally verbal individuals (ages 4;4-18;10) performing portions of a speech praxis test were coded for signs of motor speech impairment (e.g., childhood apraxia of speech). Age, autism spectrum disorder severity, nonspeech oral-motor ability, speech production ability, nonverbal IQ, and receptive vocabulary were compared between groups.

Results: Four groups emerged: (1) speech within normal limits (n=12), (2) non-childhood apraxia of speech impairment (n=16), (3) suspected childhood apraxia of speech (n=13), and (4) insufficient speech to rate (n=13). Groups differed significantly in nonspeech oral-motor ability, speech production ability, nonverbal IQ, and receptive vocabulary. Overall, only speech production ability and receptive vocabulary accounted for significant variance in number of different words. Receptive vocabulary significantly predicted number of different words only in Groups 1 and 2, while speech production ability significantly predicted number of different words only in Groups 3 and 4.

Conclusions and implications: If replicated, our findings have important implications for developing much-needed spoken language interventions in minimally verbal individuals with autism spectrum disorder.

Abstract Image

运动言语障碍预示着自闭症谱系障碍患者的语言表达能力,而不是低语言表达能力。
背景和目的:在低语言和最低语言的自闭症谱系障碍患者中,发展性运动语言障碍被怀疑,但很少有系统的检查。我们的目的是研究运动语言障碍的程度,以及它与半结构化语言样本中产生的不同单词的数量的关系。方法:54名低语言和最低语言个体(4岁;4-18岁;10岁)进行部分语言实践测试的视频被编码为运动语言障碍的迹象(例如,儿童语言失用症)。年龄、自闭症谱系障碍严重程度、非言语言语运动能力、言语产生能力、非言语智商、接受性词汇量进行比较。结果:(1)言语正常(n=12);(2)非儿童期言语障碍失用(n=16);(3)怀疑儿童期言语失用(n=13);(4)言语不足评定(n=13)。各组在非言语运动能力、言语产生能力、非言语智商和接受性词汇方面存在显著差异。总体而言,只有言语产生能力和接受性词汇量在不同词汇数量上有显著差异。接受性词汇仅在第1组和第2组显著预测不同词汇的数量,而言语产生能力仅在第3组和第4组显著预测不同词汇的数量。结论和意义:如果我们的研究结果被重复,我们的研究结果对开发自闭症谱系障碍患者急需的言语干预具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autism and Developmental Language Impairments
Autism and Developmental Language Impairments Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信