Self-Referred Walk-in (SRW) versus Emergency Medical Services Brought Covid-19 Patients.

Navid Kalani, Naser Hatami, Sajed Ali, Neema John Mehramiz, Fatemeh Rahmanian, Esmaeil Raeyat Doost, Marzieh Haghbeen, Samaneh Abiri, Mahdi Foroughian, Mohsen Ebrahimi
{"title":"Self-Referred Walk-in (SRW) versus Emergency Medical Services Brought Covid-19 Patients.","authors":"Navid Kalani,&nbsp;Naser Hatami,&nbsp;Sajed Ali,&nbsp;Neema John Mehramiz,&nbsp;Fatemeh Rahmanian,&nbsp;Esmaeil Raeyat Doost,&nbsp;Marzieh Haghbeen,&nbsp;Samaneh Abiri,&nbsp;Mahdi Foroughian,&nbsp;Mohsen Ebrahimi","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2021.92229.1299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the characteristics of the emergency medical services (EMS) brought COVID-19 patients versus self-referred walk-in patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a Cross-sectional study of COVID-19 infected cases in Jahrom, south of Iran. Age, sex, the symptoms of beginning days' passing, respiratory distress, PO2 at arrival, admission length and in-hospital death were retrieved for confirming COVID-19 cases in the whole 2020 year. Respiratory distress was considered as the sign that agitates the patient to call EMS care. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the possible difference of the hospitalization outcome in EMS brought or Self-referred walk-in (SRW) patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was 704 (27.1%) registries patients transfer to the hospital by EMS and 1895 (72.9%) cases with SRW referred to the hospital. The survival distributions for the EMS group were statistically significant and lower than SRW group (<i>p</i><0.05). Despite the SRW patients, respiratory distress was associated with lower survival in EMS group (<i>p</i><0.05). Days passing the symptom's beginning was significantly different between EMS group (6.1±5.3 days) and SRW group (6.9±4.6 days). Cox regression showed higher mortality rate in patients higher than 75 years old in both groups (<i>p</i><0.05). Higher PO2 at arrival was associated with lower mortality rate of Hazard Ratio of 0.959 (<i>p</i><0.001) and 0.903 (<i>p</i><0.001) in EMS and SRW groups, respectively. The history of heart disease and hypertension were associated with 1.011 and 1.088 times more than mortality risk in EMS group; while cancer history was associated with 2.74 times more of mortality risk in SRW group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It seems that severe acute respiratory syndrome occurs soon in some patients that lead to the need for an ambulance to transfer the patient to the hospital. Therefore, EMS transfer patients should be considered for more risk of severe COVID-19; considering comorbidities of heart disease and hypertension as red flags.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":"10 1","pages":"21-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818102/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2021.92229.1299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: To compare the characteristics of the emergency medical services (EMS) brought COVID-19 patients versus self-referred walk-in patients.

Methods: This was a Cross-sectional study of COVID-19 infected cases in Jahrom, south of Iran. Age, sex, the symptoms of beginning days' passing, respiratory distress, PO2 at arrival, admission length and in-hospital death were retrieved for confirming COVID-19 cases in the whole 2020 year. Respiratory distress was considered as the sign that agitates the patient to call EMS care. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the possible difference of the hospitalization outcome in EMS brought or Self-referred walk-in (SRW) patients.

Results: There was 704 (27.1%) registries patients transfer to the hospital by EMS and 1895 (72.9%) cases with SRW referred to the hospital. The survival distributions for the EMS group were statistically significant and lower than SRW group (p<0.05). Despite the SRW patients, respiratory distress was associated with lower survival in EMS group (p<0.05). Days passing the symptom's beginning was significantly different between EMS group (6.1±5.3 days) and SRW group (6.9±4.6 days). Cox regression showed higher mortality rate in patients higher than 75 years old in both groups (p<0.05). Higher PO2 at arrival was associated with lower mortality rate of Hazard Ratio of 0.959 (p<0.001) and 0.903 (p<0.001) in EMS and SRW groups, respectively. The history of heart disease and hypertension were associated with 1.011 and 1.088 times more than mortality risk in EMS group; while cancer history was associated with 2.74 times more of mortality risk in SRW group.

Conclusion: It seems that severe acute respiratory syndrome occurs soon in some patients that lead to the need for an ambulance to transfer the patient to the hospital. Therefore, EMS transfer patients should be considered for more risk of severe COVID-19; considering comorbidities of heart disease and hypertension as red flags.

Abstract Image

自行转诊预约(SRW)与紧急医疗服务带来的Covid-19患者。
目的:比较急诊医疗服务(EMS)带来的COVID-19患者与自行转诊的患者的特点。方法:这是一项对伊朗南部Jahrom地区COVID-19感染病例的横断面研究。检索2020年全年COVID-19确诊病例的年龄、性别、初过症状、呼吸窘迫、到达时PO2、住院时间和院内死亡。呼吸窘迫被认为是促使患者呼叫急救的信号。采用生存分析来评估EMS带来的患者和自行转诊的无预约患者的住院结局可能存在的差异。结果:有704例(27.1%)患者通过EMS转诊到医院,有1895例(72.9%)SRW转诊到医院。EMS组的生存分布有统计学意义,且低于SRW组(ppppp)。结论:一些患者似乎很快发生严重急性呼吸综合征,需要救护车将患者转移到医院。因此,应考虑EMS转院患者发生重症COVID-19的风险较大;将心脏病和高血压的合并症视为危险信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信